Report, edit, etc...Posted by Vampire on 2005-07-01 at 21:57:04
Still, they're a bit different 
Report, edit, etc...Posted by warhammer40000 on 2005-07-01 at 23:19:15
QUOTE(iamacow @ Jul 1 2005, 09:28 PM)
That only looks a little bit like a desperate attempt at being right after being proven wrong.
[right][snapback]250230[/snapback][/right]
[right][snapback]250230[/snapback][/right]
Si
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Vampire on 2005-07-02 at 08:36:06
Dude, it's true, thefore i'm right, i win 
Report, edit, etc...Posted by EzDay281 on 2005-07-02 at 13:28:31
If it's true, then tell me what the difference is.
And even if you're right, that doesn't necesarily mean that I'm wrong. My original argument was that it shouldn't be "MaxMoose", and you haven't given any reason for that to be untrue.
And even if you're right, that doesn't necesarily mean that I'm wrong. My original argument was that it shouldn't be "MaxMoose", and you haven't given any reason for that to be untrue.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Vampire on 2005-07-02 at 17:24:12
QUOTE
If it's true, then tell me what the difference is.
And even if you're right, that doesn't necesarily mean that I'm wrong. My original argument was that it shouldn't be "MaxMoose", and you haven't given any reason for that to be untrue.
And even if you're right, that doesn't necesarily mean that I'm wrong. My original argument was that it shouldn't be "MaxMoose", and you haven't given any reason for that to be untrue.
Nope, the original argument was that Large isn't the opposite of Mini, nobody was right in thisone if we go by your theory, we both were wrong since I said that the opposite of Mini is Max and you said the opposite of Mini is Large, according to that, we were both wrong.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by EzDay281 on 2005-07-02 at 20:42:20
"Max isn't the opposite of mini" is my reason, not my argument.
Max is not the opposite of mini. It should not be MaxMoose2707.
Both of those are true, both of those are what I stated.
Both of those are what you said are not true.
So, whether my argument was about the opposite of mini or whether it should be max or not, I'm correct, and correct is synonomous with right. Therefore, I am right.
Max is not the opposite of mini. It should not be MaxMoose2707.
Both of those are true, both of those are what I stated.
Both of those are what you said are not true.
So, whether my argument was about the opposite of mini or whether it should be max or not, I'm correct, and correct is synonomous with right. Therefore, I am right.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Vampire on 2005-07-02 at 21:12:25
QUOTE
"Max isn't the opposite of mini" is my reason, not my argument.
Max is not the opposite of mini. It should not be MaxMoose2707.
Both of those are true, both of those are what I stated.
Both of those are what you said are not true.
So, whether my argument was about the opposite of mini or whether it should be max or not, I'm correct, and correct is synonomous with right. Therefore, I am right.
Max is not the opposite of mini. It should not be MaxMoose2707.
Both of those are true, both of those are what I stated.
Both of those are what you said are not true.
So, whether my argument was about the opposite of mini or whether it should be max or not, I'm correct, and correct is synonomous with right. Therefore, I am right.
Stop changing your reasons and your arguments, I proved to you that Large isn't the opposite of Mini and you proved to me that Max isn't the opposite of Mini, therefore, neither of us was right, what you just said didn't make sense.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by warhammer40000 on 2005-07-02 at 21:42:21
It can be either, you retard.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Vampire on 2005-07-02 at 21:53:32
Or that, meaning that we're either both wrong or both right, and mr hipocrite over here (jake) wants to capture the win all for himself :/
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Staredit.Net Essence on 2005-07-02 at 22:03:13
BeeR owned this post too