Report, edit, etc...Posted by Pineapple on 2005-07-20 at 22:37:52
You can hate a game because of the genre it's in, Theres many game's I hate because of the genre.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by MapUnprotector on 2005-07-20 at 23:31:58
You can hate the game, but it doesn't make it suck.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Lithium on 2005-07-21 at 02:27:16
so true O_O
Report, edit, etc...Posted by some_guy on 2005-07-21 at 03:19:14
To get back on topic, I thing Starcraft is best. After all this is a Starcraft Map Making site.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by IceWarrior98 on 2005-07-21 at 20:33:14
It was extremely hard for me to decide cause i like Diablo II: LoD just as much as SC:BW but still SC is great! (Especialy since ive gone back to melee UMS maps starting to get repetitive)
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Staredit.Net Essence on 2005-07-21 at 20:46:30
QUOTE(devilesk @ Jul 20 2005, 06:50 PM)
Okay, I understand being obsessed with the medieval type stuff, but saying SC sucks? Wtf are you smoking... all the ghay maps? Try playing the actual game of Melee. Don't say it sucks if you haven't experienced the true depth of starcraft which I don't think you have if you've made such a comment. It still owns everything.
[right][snapback]266689[/snapback][/right]
[right][snapback]266689[/snapback][/right]
I've been in the SC scene since the beginning.....
I think SC blows now because the maps that are being made don't live up to the uber ones of the past (First through the Fourth years of SC)
Edit: I have experienced the true depth of SC....... I just never play it anymore cause I never have time (I actually have a job unlike half of SEN)
Yeah, it still owns everything.... That's 7 years old!
But yeah. Compared to the past, it blows now.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by MillenniumArmy on 2005-07-22 at 21:45:43
of course starcraft.
I dont like anything with the word warcraft in it. I don't like the time period in which that game takes place in, i prefer high tech and space stuff.
Diablo... that is of a different game style and I dont like that genre
I dont like anything with the word warcraft in it. I don't like the time period in which that game takes place in, i prefer high tech and space stuff.
Diablo... that is of a different game style and I dont like that genre
Report, edit, etc...Posted by i-beat-u on 2005-07-23 at 21:35:05
QUOTE(IceWarrior98 @ Jul 21 2005, 06:33 PM)
It was extremely hard for me to decide cause i like Diablo II: LoD just as much as SC:BW but still SC is great! (Especialy since ive gone back to melee UMS maps starting to get repetitive)
[right][snapback]267399[/snapback][/right]
[right][snapback]267399[/snapback][/right]
lol me too except all o me d2lod characters are expired so i dont like that anymore -_- (until i start a new char that is)
kellimus and tazzy, you should be ashamed...(only a lil bit tho cause its still a part o the blizzard family and all)
Report, edit, etc...Posted by MillenniumArmy on 2005-07-26 at 12:59:34
Starcraft and Warcraft can't really be compared with Diablo because they're different game genres. It's like comparing strategy games to first person shooter games, you cant do that.
But i am sure that we all know that SC owns WC
But i am sure that we all know that SC owns WC
Report, edit, etc...Posted by BeeR_KeG on 2005-07-26 at 13:13:16
I've played and I am a fan of every single game that Blizzard has ever relaesed.
The Diablo series would have to be in 3rd place, once you get to the high levels(in all 3 games) and got all that Ultimate items on your character there isn't much to do, it's the same thing for every character except spells. Diablo is mostly remembered by Diablo I, Diablo II was just way too repetitive once you have very high level characters.
Starcraft would go in 2nd place, mainly because it's only one game and one very old game. I've been playing Starcraft since a few months after it came out, after a lot of years you don't get that surprising feel in which you used to have back in the old days. In meele it's pretty predictable what strategies your enemy will use and UMS doesn't have new concepts like it used to.
Warcraft would be our winner. It has more games than any other universe and all of them were game of the years, as with all other Blizzard games. Warcraft II is most strategically complex game that I've ever played. Sure both races where mirror images of the other, but you could attack by air, land and sea. Especially the naval aspect is what set it aside from other games. Warcraft III was a melee disaster. Heroes changed the general RTS idea of Starcraft and Warcraft II, it became more of a "My hero is much higher level than yours so I win" type of game. It's UMS was excellent thought, providing very little need for a modification, the World Editor is the best I've seen for it's time, you can make anything.
WoW is a different story than the RTS Warcraft games, it has a feeling of it's own world. Nothing is missing in that game, it feels just like in real life. It's one of the very few games that I've played in which you reach the maximun level and there is still many things to do besides get the best items. There is no "You have finished the game feeling", the PvP is excellent.
In conclusion, all Blizzard games are very good, it's more of a matter of preference of style.
The Diablo series would have to be in 3rd place, once you get to the high levels(in all 3 games) and got all that Ultimate items on your character there isn't much to do, it's the same thing for every character except spells. Diablo is mostly remembered by Diablo I, Diablo II was just way too repetitive once you have very high level characters.
Starcraft would go in 2nd place, mainly because it's only one game and one very old game. I've been playing Starcraft since a few months after it came out, after a lot of years you don't get that surprising feel in which you used to have back in the old days. In meele it's pretty predictable what strategies your enemy will use and UMS doesn't have new concepts like it used to.
Warcraft would be our winner. It has more games than any other universe and all of them were game of the years, as with all other Blizzard games. Warcraft II is most strategically complex game that I've ever played. Sure both races where mirror images of the other, but you could attack by air, land and sea. Especially the naval aspect is what set it aside from other games. Warcraft III was a melee disaster. Heroes changed the general RTS idea of Starcraft and Warcraft II, it became more of a "My hero is much higher level than yours so I win" type of game. It's UMS was excellent thought, providing very little need for a modification, the World Editor is the best I've seen for it's time, you can make anything.
WoW is a different story than the RTS Warcraft games, it has a feeling of it's own world. Nothing is missing in that game, it feels just like in real life. It's one of the very few games that I've played in which you reach the maximun level and there is still many things to do besides get the best items. There is no "You have finished the game feeling", the PvP is excellent.
In conclusion, all Blizzard games are very good, it's more of a matter of preference of style.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by MillenniumArmy on 2005-07-26 at 13:17:29
Yea the hero thing in warcraftIII is one reason why I say wc3 sucks. Because it really defeats the purpose of just a pure RTS game.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by iamandragon on 2005-07-28 at 12:22:09
Pick StarCraft...
That's an order!
That's an order!
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Trigonometry on 2005-07-29 at 00:23:26
I pick none... I fore see crappy sequals for all three. Remember Blizzard isn't the same old Blizzard they use to be, original staff for Starcraft and Diablo/Diablo 2 went bye bye to Guildwars. I think I've said as much here.
And let's face it, with how bound and "loyal" everyone here is to Starcraft, scoffing at the mention of any other Real Time Strategy. I don't think anyone here would take lightly a Starcraft 2. It would be completely different to the very Starcraft you're loyal to. If you hate Warcraft 3... Then you're going to hate Starcraft 2, simple as that.
And let's face it, with how bound and "loyal" everyone here is to Starcraft, scoffing at the mention of any other Real Time Strategy. I don't think anyone here would take lightly a Starcraft 2. It would be completely different to the very Starcraft you're loyal to. If you hate Warcraft 3... Then you're going to hate Starcraft 2, simple as that.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by iamandragon on 2005-07-30 at 02:08:53
QUOTE(devilesk @ Jul 20 2005, 08:50 PM)
Okay, I understand being obsessed with the medieval type stuff, but saying SC sucks? Wtf are you smoking... all the ghay maps? Try playing the actual game of Melee. Don't say it sucks if you haven't experienced the true depth of starcraft which I don't think you have if you've made such a comment. It still owns everything.
[right][snapback]266689[/snapback][/right]
[right][snapback]266689[/snapback][/right]
It's the ums maps that sucked, the melee games are still up big.
WC3 really disappointed their fans...I hope SC2 doesn't.