Report, edit, etc...Posted by glytchur on 2005-10-22 at 10:22:39
ppl would actually have to post meaningful stuff and not be complete idiots...
OH NOEZ!!1111
OH NOEZ!!1111
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Staredit.Net Essence on 2005-10-22 at 14:05:15
Who cares if the Null went away?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by MapUnprotector on 2005-10-22 at 14:13:37
Idiots would.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Staredit.Net Essence on 2005-10-22 at 14:52:46
Good point. No wonder I don't care, and only the noobs do.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Hitl1r1 on 2005-10-22 at 15:21:07
Some people here are probably just for the null...
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Ultimo on 2005-10-22 at 23:06:34
You think you'd that that idea from the people who have over 3000 posts in that forum alone. 
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Dr.Shotgun on 2005-10-27 at 18:26:24
A lot of funny things happen in Null, but it is being flooded with spam.
However, this is a bad intervention. I think some of the mods have a huge tolearance for spam and general moronity (That's why certain people *coughYaeXirillioncough* are still here). This is a problem because a lot of idiots, trolls, and spammers exist on site, and they tend to create the spam that goes on in Null.
Not only that, but deleting null would make all the spammers move to Lite Discussion. This is bad because Lite Discussion is a "cash" forum, so spammers would benefit. Consequently, this would result in the "decashifying" or the possible deletion of the Lite forum. This would hinder some of the less moronic memebers and there would be no place for light topics.
I think Null should be permission-locked, only members with a certain number of quality posts should be let in. Why? Because they are likely to be more mature and less spammy. Spammers also need to be more quickly banned.
However, this is a bad intervention. I think some of the mods have a huge tolearance for spam and general moronity (That's why certain people *coughYaeXirillioncough* are still here). This is a problem because a lot of idiots, trolls, and spammers exist on site, and they tend to create the spam that goes on in Null.
Not only that, but deleting null would make all the spammers move to Lite Discussion. This is bad because Lite Discussion is a "cash" forum, so spammers would benefit. Consequently, this would result in the "decashifying" or the possible deletion of the Lite forum. This would hinder some of the less moronic memebers and there would be no place for light topics.
I think Null should be permission-locked, only members with a certain number of quality posts should be let in. Why? Because they are likely to be more mature and less spammy. Spammers also need to be more quickly banned.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Syphon on 2005-10-27 at 19:29:04
QUOTE(Dr.Shotgun @ Oct 27 2005, 04:26 PM)
A lot of funny things happen in Null, but it is being flooded with spam.
However, this is a bad intervention. I think some of the mods have a huge tolearance for spam and general moronity (That's why certain people *coughYaeXirillioncough* are still here). This is a problem because a lot of idiots, trolls, and spammers exist on site, and they tend to create the spam that goes on in Null.
Not only that, but deleting null would make all the spammers move to Lite Discussion. This is bad because Lite Discussion is a "cash" forum, so spammers would benefit. Consequently, this would result in the "decashifying" or the possible deletion of the Lite forum. This would hinder some of the less moronic memebers and there would be no place for light topics.
I think Null should be permission-locked, only members with a certain number of quality posts should be let in. Why? Because they are likely to be more mature and less spammy. Spammers also need to be more quickly banned.
[right][snapback]342686[/snapback][/right]
However, this is a bad intervention. I think some of the mods have a huge tolearance for spam and general moronity (That's why certain people *coughYaeXirillioncough* are still here). This is a problem because a lot of idiots, trolls, and spammers exist on site, and they tend to create the spam that goes on in Null.
Not only that, but deleting null would make all the spammers move to Lite Discussion. This is bad because Lite Discussion is a "cash" forum, so spammers would benefit. Consequently, this would result in the "decashifying" or the possible deletion of the Lite forum. This would hinder some of the less moronic memebers and there would be no place for light topics.
I think Null should be permission-locked, only members with a certain number of quality posts should be let in. Why? Because they are likely to be more mature and less spammy. Spammers also need to be more quickly banned.
[right][snapback]342686[/snapback][/right]
Note to shotgun, yae got banned and hasn't returned since.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by warhammer40000 on 2005-10-27 at 19:33:17
QUOTE(Syphon @ Oct 27 2005, 07:29 PM)
Note to shotgun, yae got banned and hasn't returned since.
[right][snapback]342742[/snapback][/right]
[right][snapback]342742[/snapback][/right]
Yay!!! Anyway, why?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Dr.Shotgun on 2005-10-28 at 17:39:54
Why is his avatar/sig still up? Anyways, he stayed here for too long. The admins should've banned him by his tenth:
post. I mean, he spammed up the fourms a good bit before he left, its people like him who are degrading SEN.
QUOTE(Not an actual quote @ style imitation)
I aM RikkY hiGjh
Is Dat
oS I liek spim noRbs i aM leeT
Is Dat
oS I liek spim noRbs i aM leeT
post. I mean, he spammed up the fourms a good bit before he left, its people like him who are degrading SEN.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Ultimo on 2005-10-28 at 18:01:45
He was suspended since he posted his picture everywhere in Null.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Minority on 2005-10-30 at 01:57:25
QUOTE(Ultimo @ Oct 29 2005, 08:31 AM)
He was suspended since he posted his picture everywhere in Null.
[right][snapback]343210[/snapback][/right]
[right][snapback]343210[/snapback][/right]
Really? I keep killing him in the "How Will the Person Above You Die?" thread (maybe he was only suspended for a for a day or two).
I really don't think baleting the Null forum would be a good idea. As others have already said, all the spammers would move to Lite Discussion, which is a mineral forum, so all the spammers would become Elites in a week and get bajillions of minerals (until IP or Moose balete that forum as well, anyway).
Report, edit, etc...Posted by NerdyTerdy on 2005-10-30 at 01:10:55
I think this topic itself is pretty moronic 
, but whatever people have their own tastes... I think a combination of the two suggestions said would happen I think a lot of the spammers would just go to the other forums and others would just leave, it might be an improvement or a degration (not sure of what word to use...) It would just depend how many did what. warhamma is amazing almost 4000 posts in Null, I love it! :-D 
, but whatever people have their own tastes... I think a combination of the two suggestions said would happen I think a lot of the spammers would just go to the other forums and others would just leave, it might be an improvement or a degration (not sure of what word to use...) It would just depend how many did what. warhamma is amazing almost 4000 posts in Null, I love it! :-D Report, edit, etc...Posted by Deathawk on 2005-10-30 at 09:58:10
I seem to shy away from the null, unless I like the topic.
And thank god Yae is gone, he was such a spammer.
And thank god Yae is gone, he was such a spammer.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Mr.Camo on 2005-10-30 at 12:05:15
All hell would break lose and nuke & I would go on an anarchy spree on the site because my "what are you listening to" thread is in there.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by DT_Battlekruser on 2005-10-30 at 12:39:20
It's funny how it seems hard for most regular members over 500 posts not to have their biggest fraction of posts in Null. Even I do, although MMA is closely vying for it.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Ultimo on 2005-10-30 at 13:24:22
My total post count > My Null Count. Woo, that's a first for me. My posts in Clan Mp) are second I believe. O_O
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Voyager7456(MM) on 2005-10-30 at 13:46:08
Spam would go down. People would (me included) stop posting in Null and actually get some work done on their projects! Warhamma would die! The Mr.Camo thread would be lost forever in the mists of time!
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Mayhem on 2005-10-30 at 21:24:17
Ya I think a lot of ppl would leave
I pesonally dont post on null but then again i an new
I pesonally dont post on null but then again i an new
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Tmac on 2005-10-30 at 21:38:08
All the SPAM would fall into Lite Discussion.
(has this been said before?)
Anyway some people like Null, like me!
(has this been said before?)
Anyway some people like Null, like me!
Report, edit, etc...Posted by MapUnprotector on 2005-10-30 at 22:10:31
QUOTE(DT_Battlekruser @ Oct 30 2005, 01:39 PM)
It's funny how it seems hard for most regular members over 500 posts not to have their biggest fraction of posts in Null. Even I do, although MMA is closely vying for it.
[right][snapback]344284[/snapback][/right]
[right][snapback]344284[/snapback][/right]
Ya, I can't believe most of my posts are in Null too
I think most of my posts are in Serious Discussion or other forums, but I guess it just seems that way because those posts are more meaningful.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Deathawk on 2005-10-30 at 22:13:19
I thought you had a lot in Serious too..
But then again, I don't pay much attention
I try to avoid null, I don't want to start turning into a warhamma... and I don't get cumulative posts in the null
But then again, I don't pay much attention
I try to avoid null, I don't want to start turning into a warhamma... and I don't get cumulative posts in the null
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Mayhem on 2005-10-31 at 09:21:29
ya there would be a big spam problem n a lot of morons on null would post stuff here which would get rrly anoying 
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Demaris on 2005-10-31 at 10:30:32
Maybe i would get post credit for all the times i posted on "kill the person above you"
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Mini Moose 2707 on 2005-10-31 at 11:21:45
QUOTE(DT_Battlekruser @ Oct 30 2005, 01:39 PM)
It's funny how it seems hard for most regular members over 500 posts not to have their biggest fraction of posts in Null.
For the older members, a lot of their posts were relocated to Null somewhere along the way.