Staredit Network

Staredit Network -> Games -> WoW Expansion, Diablo 3 ans *GASP* Starcraft 2

Report, edit, etc...Posted by Zycorax on 2005-10-29 at 11:40:56

QUOTE(BeeR_KeG @ Oct 28 2005, 11:12 PM)

In my opinion, SC:Ghost is a disaster. With the 360 coming out in a few months and the PS3 coming in early-mid 2006, SC:Ghost will be out for the PS2 and Xbox while the bulk of console players will move to Next-Gen consoles. Problem was that as usual, BLizzard took too long in making the game. The game will have it's share of sales but not as much as if it were released prior to Xbox360's release.
[right][snapback]343175[/snapback][/right]

Are you sure about that? If thats true Im very happy

because Im not going to buy any new console.

QUOTE(DEAD @ Oct 28 2005, 11:13 PM)

I hope that Diablo 3 and Starcraft 2 wont be in 3d, because blizzard totally suck at 3d, even when there are so many amazing 3d games with beautiful 3d blizzard's 3d still look very old and crappy.
[right][snapback]343177[/snapback][/right]

Diablo 3 can be in 3d, but I really hope that the only differences from the good old Starcraft and SC2 will be that it got better graphic and maybe some new units and tilesets.

QUOTE(BeeR_KeG @ Oct 28 2005, 11:18 PM)

Chances are that all games to be made in the future for the PC made by BLizzard will be in 3D. Why is this? Because of marketing issues. If Blizzard releases a 2D game, it won't appeal to players who have never seen the original Starcraft, they will think of it as an old boring game. The first impression that any person has on a game are the graphics. So they will be basically cutting down their potential market to around 7 million (Amount of Starcraft copies sold) and of those 7 million about 2 million are too old or uninterested in Blizzard.
[right][snapback]343180[/snapback][/right]

I never really care about the graphics in games, but I know that lots of other people do. Way too many set the graphic quality higher than the gameplay quality, I find that kinda sad

Like the people in my class, they say SC sucks just because its old and dont have the best graphic in the world, but they have not really ever played it. whatever, they live in a city so I cant really expect anything else

Report, edit, etc...Posted by Syphon on 2005-10-29 at 14:18:51

QUOTE(Zycorax @ Oct 29 2005, 09:40 AM)

I never really care about the graphics in games, but I know that lots of other people do. Way too many set the graphic quality higher than the gameplay quality, I find that kinda sad

[right][snapback]343594[/snapback][/right]

Li\ucky you, people I know say it sucks because it's worse than runescape? I know some big fooles.

Report, edit, etc...Posted by KrAzY on 2005-11-02 at 02:15:37

I saw a RPG that looks exactly like Diablo 2 but with better graphics, but not gothic.

ADDITION:
WoW Expansion? I don't think there would be since they could easily update the main game. Would WoW on xbox live beat Halo 2 or 3? Maybe, and yes.

StarCraft 2 would probably come out 2007 as thought of by everybody, everybody knows it would come out 2007.

Don't forget StarCraft: Ghost is coming out in December 31st, 2005. The makers are now the Swingin' Apes than Blizzard who are the publishes for now on.

Report, edit, etc...Posted by Gigins on 2005-11-02 at 11:16:19

As far as I have seen then graphics even in Half-Life1 are better that SC ghost. Yap Blizzard is far behind all other game-companies in 3d by several years.

Report, edit, etc...Posted by SiLeNT(U) on 2005-11-02 at 19:05:33

QUOTE(KrAzY @ Nov 2 2005, 02:15 AM)

WoW expansion is alread being worked on, goto www.blizzard.com or www.battle.net.

It's called The Burning Crusade

Report, edit, etc...Posted by Deathawk on 2005-11-02 at 20:04:07

QUOTE(Zycorax @ Oct 29 2005, 10:40 AM)

whatever, they live in a city so I cant really expect anything else

[right][snapback]343594[/snapback][/right]

I don't blame you, cities suck.

WoW on XBox Live would be great.
Too bad it would come out on XBox 360... I wonder how that would work, if you had to pay to play, in addittion to your XBox live account.

Report, edit, etc...Posted by BeeR_KeG on 2005-11-03 at 18:53:11

The thing with the WoW Expansion is that it will ship out in both a CD-Expansion and Patch Expansion. With the CD you will have access to everything including new areas, races and pretty much everything. If you don't buy the expansion you'll still be able to download the Expansion patch with will just let you have the new items, skills, increased level cap and posibly a few areas, but definetly not any dungeon or world.

Blizzard isn't dumb enough to obligate everyone to buy the expansion or make expansion only servers which will split the population.

Report, edit, etc...Posted by Deathawk on 2005-11-03 at 19:25:38

Heck, if the patch is free, I would take it...
But I don't have WoW, so I guess it wouldn't matter to me.

Report, edit, etc...Posted by Shapechanger on 2005-11-03 at 20:00:38

QUOTE

WoW Expansion? I don't think there would be since they could easily update the main game.

QUOTE

It's called The Burning Crusade

How'd you miss that info? It's all over the front pages.

And I really hope they don't go through with this Diablo 3 crap. Blizzard sucks complete and utter ass with 3D texturing. The polygons themselves were actually of good quality.

Starcraft: Ghost, this one cracks me up. The orginal release date was November of 2003.
As Douglas Adam puts it:
Deadlines are great, I love deadlines. But the thing I really, really love about deadlines is that WHOOSH noise they make when they go flying past!

Report, edit, etc...Posted by Zycorax on 2005-11-04 at 17:56:16

I'm really looking forward to the WoW expansion

And maybe I should take Starcraft Ghost of my wish list this christmas, its been there for two or three years now

Report, edit, etc...Posted by Zombie on 2005-11-04 at 22:59:37

QUOTE

Chris Hartgraves, former employee of Blizzard Entertainment, has sent us word that Diablo 3 will be aired at Blizzcon.

From what we've heard Diablo 3 is going to be an MMO, as massive as World of Warcraft, with the concept of Hell invading Heaven. One rumor going around with Diablo 3 is that there will be Guild Housing included. The game is said to be looking brilliant and will be showcased at Blizzcon as their big suprise.

when i see that on the store shelfs i will orgasm three times...

i cant wait for d3... if i half to pay online for it... like wow.... i will be so pist.... just blizzards way to rip peeps off =/.

Report, edit, etc...Posted by Shapechanger on 2005-11-04 at 23:08:20

That's how all professionally made MMO's are!!
OMG so tempted to flame right now...

Report, edit, etc...Posted by Zombie on 2005-11-04 at 23:11:21

QUOTE(Cronus @ Nov 4 2005, 09:08 PM)

That's how all professionally made MMO's are!!
OMG so tempted to flame right now...

[right][snapback]348422[/snapback][/right]

flame me so i can own you in your attempt to flame

professionally? pfft. why pay money every month FOR A GAME! youve already spend 50$ (or more) on the game its self.

Report, edit, etc...Posted by Shapechanger on 2005-11-04 at 23:13:10

Don't buy it then. WoW is so much fun I gladly fork up the 15$ a month.

Report, edit, etc...Posted by Gigins on 2005-11-05 at 04:05:58

lol my pp(personal pirate) made me WoW for 8$. And I can play on our "kenga" server for free.

Yes "kenga" server has much more bugs and stuff, but if you ask me then the lag is way smaller

Report, edit, etc...Posted by Freedawk on 2005-11-05 at 07:51:06

I wanna get the exp...btu my mom said no...

Report, edit, etc...Posted by Voyager7456(MM) on 2005-11-05 at 09:04:02

QUOTE(Cronus @ Nov 4 2005, 10:08 PM)

That's how all professionally made MMO's are!!
OMG so tempted to flame right now...

[right][snapback]348422[/snapback][/right]

What about Guild Wars?

Report, edit, etc...Posted by Syphon on 2005-11-10 at 17:03:15

QUOTE(DEAD @ Nov 2 2005, 10:16 AM)

As far as I have seen then graphics even in Half-Life1 are better that SC ghost. Yap Blizzard is far behind all other game-companies in 3d by several years.
[right][snapback]346792[/snapback][/right]

Except in the cinimatics, the cinimatics for starcraft were about 5 years ahead of their time.

Report, edit, etc...Posted by Cnl.Fatso on 2005-11-11 at 15:42:43

Yes, beautifully-animated cinematics...

...Yeah.

Report, edit, etc...Posted by Tmac on 2005-11-11 at 16:20:47

The cinematics were awesome.

Report, edit, etc...Posted by Staredit.Net Essence on 2005-11-11 at 22:01:36

Have any of you actually seen wc3 on max settings. It's awsome for 2003. They didnt want to overload the computer tech average at the time which is what I have now. They work with the main public that is why consoles are so much easier to work with because there is a set limit. WoW has to look the way it does its way better than EQ:2 and on full settings it looks like a Halo 2. And wc3 is an awsome game people from starcraft just arent used to it. They could make perfect graphics as any artist could but no computer could run it. And the cinimatics for sc were only 5 years ahead of its time because people werent used to the new high poly modeling. you guys do know that those so called "bad 3d graphics" were part of those cinimatics. I want to flame alot more but w/e. As blizzcon has passed we all know this isnt true so w/e.

Report, edit, etc...Posted by D)s-202 on 2005-11-19 at 16:45:32

starcraft cinematics do look cool but.. kept is right if any of yu looked at high setting at warcraft 3. I think the orcs don't look like tehy want to be cuddled..

Report, edit, etc...Posted by Joshgt2 on 2005-11-19 at 22:18:25

First I am getting Diablo 3 but then StarCraft 2 will be right there as well. I think that Diablo will come out on top due to its major role playing type of genre but on the same token StarCraft has the best ability for tactical warfare.

Report, edit, etc...Posted by Voyager7456(MM) on 2005-11-20 at 09:20:23

There was a news article somewhere that said the Diablo 3 and SC2 thing was a hoax... can't find the link right now though.

Report, edit, etc...Posted by Freedawk on 2005-11-20 at 09:42:42

QUOTE

Blizzard will also use the BlizzCon event to introduce Diablo 3 to gamers and if the excitement of Blizzard employees is anything to go by, the game will be a big deal. According to a message sent by former Blizzard employee Chris Hartgraves, Diablo 3 takes place in heaven. Hell is trying to take it over and it is AWESOME looking ... Imagine the brightness of heaven being taken over by the darkness of hell ... Imagine WoW but in a Diablo world in amount of size and playability ... Also, guild housing is available in this game for those of you who know about it. They should have a gameplay demo to show at BlizzCon.

This bit of "news" was taken from a forum post on a WoW fansite which features long quotes from an email allegedly sent by alleged ex-Bliz employee Chris Hartgraves.

While the "D3 at Blizzcon" info was obviously wrong (good for cheap hits though), most of the WoW-X predictions made in the post seem to be pretty accurate, so take that for what you will as you sift through the D3 content rumors. And wonder what happened to the NDA ex-gaming company employees are routinely required to sign...

Incidentally, with the title of the WoW expansion now officially The Burning Crusade, go back and check out our news items about that title from May 25th and 26th of this year, when a reader discovered that Blizzard had registered that trademark name for computer software. Speculation ensued, though another reader soon pointed us to a page from Bliz's WoW site that made pretty clear that game's relationship to the title.

Well here is proof that there is a Diablo 3...They said that there is a demo in the WoW Expansion...

Next Page (2)