Staredit Network

Staredit Network -> Lite Discussion -> What is your IQ?

Report, edit, etc...Posted by Staredit.Net Essence on 2005-12-29 at 19:51:12

QUOTE(XxPacmaynExX @ Dec 28 2005, 09:35 AM)

http://tickle.com/ or something i think.
[right][snapback]391459[/snapback][/right]

Report, edit, etc...Posted by Kow on 2005-12-29 at 19:53:14

Sorry, I thought it was mis-linked, since it looked like a matchmaking site...

Report, edit, etc...Posted by Staredit.Net Essence on 2005-12-29 at 19:54:26

http://web.tickle.com/tests/superiq/author...riq%2Findex.jsp

Report, edit, etc...Posted by Cloud on 2005-12-29 at 20:13:11

my iq is -1

Report, edit, etc...Posted by Kow on 2005-12-29 at 20:24:50

125, Creative Theorist

If all Laps are Lops, all Lops are Loops, and all Loops are Lups, then which of the following is not true?
- All Laps are Loops
- All Loops are Laps
- All Laps are Lups
- All Lops are Lups

Wtf, they're all true!

Report, edit, etc...Posted by justin_grant on 2005-12-29 at 21:10:27

I took four online tests... I got 110, 150, 200, and 202... So Im around 150 I guess... It also said I thought artistic... and I think it might be true even though I mainly only paint peoples motorbikes.

Report, edit, etc...Posted by CheeZe on 2005-12-29 at 21:16:50

http://www.highiqsociety.org/iq_tests/

Stop taking the ones that want money.

Report, edit, etc...Posted by Kow on 2005-12-29 at 21:22:44

That one hurts my brain -.-

Report, edit, etc...Posted by Syphon on 2005-12-29 at 21:24:57

193 is an imeasurable IQ, so he's either lieing, or the "psychiatrist" is a quack.

Whoops, didn't see those posts.

Report, edit, etc...Posted by Kow on 2005-12-29 at 21:25:35

It was a mockery of everyone else.

Report, edit, etc...Posted by Syphon on 2005-12-29 at 21:26:23

Do you not like us being smrt?

I AM SO SMRT! s-m-r-t!

Report, edit, etc...Posted by Dr.Shotgun on 2005-12-29 at 21:48:15

QUOTE(Kow @ Dec 29 2005, 08:24 PM)

#2 is false

Report, edit, etc...Posted by Kow on 2005-12-29 at 21:54:31

How?

Report, edit, etc...Posted by M_s4 on 2005-12-29 at 21:56:35

QUOTE

Kow

#2 aint true, because they are getting "more" specific down the line. And all except #2 is where the more specific one comes after the one that is less.

Report, edit, etc...Posted by Kow on 2005-12-29 at 21:58:38

QUOTE(Kow @ Dec 29 2005, 08:24 PM)

Lap = Loop
Loop = lap
lap = lup
lop = lup

Lap = Loop = Lap = Lup

All are equal

Report, edit, etc...Posted by CheeZe on 2005-12-29 at 22:14:40

No, there's no relationship between Loops and Laps.

All Laps => Lops.

All Lops => Loops.

But not All Loops => Laps.

Report, edit, etc...Posted by Kow on 2005-12-29 at 22:41:33

QUOTE(CheeZe @ Dec 29 2005, 10:14 PM)

No, there's no relationship between Loops and Laps.

All Laps => Lops.

All Lops => Loops.

But not All Loops => Laps.
[right][snapback]393322[/snapback][/right]

But if Lap = Lop, Lop = Loops, then Lap = Loops.

Report, edit, etc...Posted by DiscipleOfAdun on 2005-12-29 at 22:47:58

QUOTE(Kow @ Dec 29 2005, 07:24 PM)

125, Creative Theorist

If all Laps are Lops, all Lops are Loops, and all Loops are Lups, then which of the following is not true?
- All Laps are Loops
-    All Loops are Laps
   - All Laps are Lups
-   All Lops are Lups

Wtf, they're all true!
[right][snapback]393175[/snapback][/right]

1. True, because it is a definition of a definition.(if you read 2, then it is: All Squares are parallelograms)
2. False, because it does not say that all loops are lops. Imagine Lups are 4 sided polygons. Then, loops may be parallelograms. Lops are then rectangles, and laps are squares. Now, are all parallelograms squares? No, because both rectangles and rhombii are parallelograms, but neither are squares. It helps to make something abstract into something concrete when solving.
3. True, refer to the 4 sided figure interpretation - All squares are 4 sided polygons.
4. True, refer to the interpretation - All rectangles are 4 sided polygons.

There. That's how it all works.

Report, edit, etc...Posted by Kow on 2005-12-29 at 23:01:14

Oh, I was thinking of it as equalities, not refinations.

Report, edit, etc...Posted by T-MaStAA on 2005-12-29 at 23:09:17

Lol i took the fame and fortune test.

What's Your Fame and Fortune?
T-MaSTAA, you're likely to find fame and fortune in the Scientific World

Talk about inventive! You're one of those people who has a special way of seeing a problem, wrapping your head around it, and squeezing out a solution that's nothing but pure genius. So what if you never won at the science fair (but congrats if you did). The fact is, you have a mind made for experimenting. You enjoy a mental challenge and like creating — whether it's a new invention for the sake of invention or something that solves people's more immediate problems.

Don't have crazy hair like Einstein? Don't know a Bunsen burner from a test tube? No sweat. Maybe you'll discover a cure for cancer. Maybe you'll be the first human to set foot on Mars. Or maybe you'll figure out how to safely make landfills evaporate.

Whatever you do, with a brain like yours, you're bound for scientific greatness. So get going! Fame and fortune await! The world's still waiting for someone to create that triple-chocolate, fudge, ice cream cake with zero calories! Or shoelaces that don't fray at the ends, or headphones that automatically adjust for outside noise factors, or rainproof-breathable fleece, or...

Report, edit, etc...Posted by Staredit.Net Essence on 2005-12-29 at 23:26:34

Kow, I scored 8 higher than you.

Report, edit, etc...Posted by M_s4 on 2005-12-29 at 23:49:09

I remember this test... I got a 138, but I cheated on the verbal parts by using dictionary.com (shame on me

but what the heck, it's an internet test) , so I'd say I'dve really gotten 130 or something.

Wow, SENers are smart

Report, edit, etc...Posted by Ninebreaker on 2005-12-30 at 00:53:33

QUOTE(CheeZe @ Dec 28 2005, 09:58 AM)

Online tests don't reflect anything. But if you want range, take the score you got (online), do +10,-80 on it and that you should give you something.
[right][snapback]391478[/snapback][/right]

Lol So did i. And i got 109

The first time i got bored 1/2 thru so i candom selected em and still got 90...

Report, edit, etc...Posted by Kow on 2005-12-30 at 01:04:09

QUOTE(Mp)Shorty @ Dec 29 2005, 11:26 PM)

Kow, I scored 8 higher than you.

[right][snapback]393427[/snapback][/right]

*glare*

That one floops question we were debating didn't have enough specifications to make any of them false. It would have made more sense if it said like all floops are not flups or somting like that (cant remember what was what)

Report, edit, etc...Posted by Chronophobia on 2005-12-30 at 08:09:30

It's so hard with those hard english words when I am Swedish. I got 117

Next Page (2)