QUOTE(Skcusamin @ Feb 13 2006, 01:34 PM)
I'll be like every other "intelligent" person here, and point out that digust is not spelt, discust.
It is not spelt Digust either, its spelt Disgust.
QUOTE(Skcusamin @ Feb 13 2006, 01:34 PM)
And why do you always talk about Kellimus? Is it because you know he is right about everything or something? Or does it iritate you that he shows how hypocritical you really are?
I dont, he normally does. I was just reffering to him because that was the exact point in time when I started chatting in offtopic forums. You seem to enjoy talking about him more, with your paragraphs of writing above.
QUOTE(Skcusamin @ Feb 13 2006, 01:34 PM)
For example, I shall use the arguement that you two were having in the thread about gays, before he got banned, and mix in some of our arguement, too:
Kellimus: Nimadude, you're a hypocrite by saying that it's wrong for gays to have kids. You state that you dont discriminate against gays, yet you also state that gays having kids is just plain wrong, which is a form of discrmination.
Nimadude: I'm not a hypocrite! You need to learn meanings of words lewser!
Thats not what I said at first. I explained to him my reasoning, which he carried on ignoring, being the ignorant person he is. There is a difference between discrimination and betterment for society. Take disabled people, for example. Would it be feasible for them to adopt kids? No, because they cannot raise a child, let alone take care of themselves. Am I discriminating disabled people and hating them? No. Back to my argument against gay adoption, I am not labeling gays as disabled, but am simply providing an analogy for my reasoning. Now, you may argue, "But why cant gays take care of children?". Well, technically, they can. They dont physically lack anything, other than breast milk, to raise a child. However, psychologically, their influence would not be good for the child.
There are people out in society that are against gays, the child would feel uncomfortable having his/her parents insulted upon all the time. If the child becomes gay, there is a 99% chance that it was from the influence of his/her parents. Since the child is adopted and has no genetic relation to his/her parents, it is unlikely for it to genetically become gay naturally. Now, becoming gay due to the influence of others rather than the nature of the brain is an act that is frowned upon in religions and in society. Not necessarily the child to be blamed, but the parents. They should not bias the childs views on life in an abnormal way. (IE- suggesting gay life).
Sure, there are the odd few gay parents that have raised a child completely fine, but the risk that is taken, which could lead to the problems above, is just not worth it. Hence, it is for the betterment of society.
This is a very controversial topic that shouldnt be discussed in this thread, but since you wrote a page, I will too. Even if you still do not agree with me, thats fine, you are entitled to your own opinion.
And by the way, I was not being completely serious in my original post. Sure, my attendance to this site has grown, but it has never interfered with life affairs. I was simply making it appealing for a matter of conversation. Now please, stop biasing your views towards me because I had problems with your friend (kellimus), the lot of you, and humiliating yourselves.