Report, edit, etc...Posted by DT_Battlekruser on 2006-04-27 at 22:03:11
I'd say fight to find a solution and neither deny nor announce the existence of it. Don't mention it, and remove any links. We should never under any circumstance support the program or supply a link to it.
If it becomes necessary, we can mention that a flawless unprotector has indeed been made, but make sure it doesn't get linked to.
If it becomes necessary, we can mention that a flawless unprotector has indeed been made, but make sure it doesn't get linked to.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by LegacyWeapon on 2006-04-27 at 22:15:47
QUOTE(DT_Battlekruser @ Apr 27 2006, 09:02 PM)
I'd say fight to find a solution and neither deny nor announce the existence of it. Don't mention it, and remove any links. We should never under any circumstance support the program or supply a link to it.
If it becomes necessary, we can mention that a flawless unprotector has indeed been made, but make sure it doesn't get linked to.
[right][snapback]474235[/snapback][/right]
You do realize that I will not be able to further map protection without extensive research on how this unprotector program works and how SC reads maps (still for more protection methods).If it becomes necessary, we can mention that a flawless unprotector has indeed been made, but make sure it doesn't get linked to.
[right][snapback]474235[/snapback][/right]
I don't know many others who are still working on protection methods. I'm pretty sure none of them are actually making any programs.
I don't know how long we'll be able to censor this program. And I don't know if this will be the end of protection or not.
I don't know if this guy will update his program. I don't know how well he knows protection.
There are many factors in this war and most of them we don't have knowledge of.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by PCFredZ on 2006-05-05 at 19:44:33
A search for "stacraft osmap" on google turned up this, which is apparently the author of the program.
Grab the pitchforks and torches and follow me!
Grab the pitchforks and torches and follow me!
Report, edit, etc...Posted by MillenniumArmy on 2006-05-05 at 23:06:57
Entropy posted OSMAP on pgtour.net. Now it's DEFINATELY going to fall into the wrong hands. Not only into the UMS world, but the bigger melee world as well.
But it's primarily a threat only to the UMS world.
But it's primarily a threat only to the UMS world.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by LegacyWeapon on 2006-05-06 at 00:27:52
QUOTE(MillenniumArmy @ May 5 2006, 11:06 PM)
Entropy posted OSMAP on pgtour.net.
[right][snapback]480403[/snapback][/right]
He did? Where?[right][snapback]480403[/snapback][/right]
Report, edit, etc...Posted by MillenniumArmy on 2006-05-06 at 00:43:00
http://www.pgtour.net/newsportal.view.php?newsid=947
These are portal news so normally people don't comment much, but they do get read quite a bit.
These are portal news so normally people don't comment much, but they do get read quite a bit.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by PCFredZ on 2006-05-07 at 19:04:33
I tried to unprotect my World of Starcraft 2 with the latest version and got a "Run time error '6': overflow" error. I am very sad. 
On the bright side, it was protected simply with PROEdit, so apparently the unprotection is still a hit-and-miss gimick.
On the bright side, it was protected simply with PROEdit, so apparently the unprotection is still a hit-and-miss gimick.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by CheeZe on 2006-05-07 at 21:07:58
To PCFredZ: It worked. .. (Liar!)
I think this program does what Moose thinks it does.
I think this program does what Moose thinks it does.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by MillenniumArmy on 2006-05-07 at 21:47:15
QUOTE(PCFredZ @ May 7 2006, 06:04 PM)
I tried to unprotect my World of Starcraft 2 with the latest version and got a "Run time error '6': overflow" error. I am very sad.
On the bright side, it was protected simply with PROEdit, so apparently the unprotection is still a hit-and-miss gimick.
[right][snapback]481816[/snapback][/right]
On the bright side, it was protected simply with PROEdit, so apparently the unprotection is still a hit-and-miss gimick.
[right][snapback]481816[/snapback][/right]
What version of proedit did u use?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by PCFredZ on 2006-05-08 at 16:48:42
QUOTE(CheeZe @ May 7 2006, 09:07 PM)
To PCFredZ: It worked. .. (Liar!)
I think this program does what Moose thinks it does.
[right][snapback]481909[/snapback][/right]
I think this program does what Moose thinks it does.
[right][snapback]481909[/snapback][/right]
It didn't work for me, don't know why. Can you send me the unprotected version though? I kinda need it lol.
QUOTE(MillenniumArmy @ May 7 2006, 09:46 PM)
What version of proedit did u use?
[right][snapback]481946[/snapback][/right]
[right][snapback]481946[/snapback][/right]
1.3.0.0, maybe. Can't remember, it was a while back. 1.3.0.0 is the version I have right now anyway.