QUOTE
i belive in creationism, because theres tons of archaeological proof of it, chariots at the bottom of the sea, ramses (pharaoh) was written in the bible before any archaeologists have found his body. Tons of things found in israel.
as to disprove evolution, the theory disproves itself, seeings how, everything tends toward disorganization, so if a human race is crated from a primordial soup, wats keeping it going into the common stages of the human race?
What? No offence, but everything you said makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. Please inform me of how chariots at the bottom of the sea are proof of creationism? And your point that Ramses was written in the bible before any archaeologists found his body, wtf? The bible was written during his (Ramses) time. Archaeologists are much more recent, being that the field is relatively modern (within the last few centuries). So, writing the name of someone, during their time, is no miraculous feat. By your standards, Shakespeare's play "Ceasar" is equally miraculous, given that Shakespeare wrote of Julius Ceasar before archaeologists found his remains. That's not a miracle, buddy.
And we can't forget about "tons of things found in israel". I've found tons of things in my apartment. This old pizza box must also be proof of creationism. Seriously, using the word "things" to back up something is weak. Also, no "thing" found in Israel is proof your god created man and women, as well as the whole earth and everything on it. According to the Bible, the earth was created roughly 7000 years ago. Scientists have found rocks that they've measured at being over 3.5 BILLION years old. Believing in god is one thing. Being

ing stupid is another.
And your statement for how evolution disproves itself, sounds more like an argument FOR evolution. Yes, natural tendency is chaotic, and things tend to become more disorganized. That's how evolution occurs. Chaos and disorganization cause subtle changes to one's genetic code, and, if this subtle change causes the being to thrive, then it will reproduce, and spread, until eventually all creatures of that species have incorporated the change into their own genetic code, hence, EVOLVING.
Evolution has an amazing amount of evidence backing it up, whereas creationism has ABSOLUTELY none. The Bible is not evidence. It's a book. Whether you believe in it's doctrine or not, you can't deny that it is still nothing more than a book. An important book, some would say, but still a book. Books are not hard evidence. If I wanted to prove that the world rests on the back of a turtle, which stands on the back of another turtle, ad infinitum, I could find a number of books proving that as well. Now, obviously, the world does not sit on top of a stack of infinite turtles, so it stands to reason that books are not suitable to use as evidence.
Now, evolution, has concrete evidence. This evidence does not prove it true, since nothing is 100% provable, not even gravity. However, scientists have observed evolutionary reactions in process. This is undeniable. Scientists can constantly observe mutations and evolutions in creatures. Scientists have also recreated the conditions of the earth, before life came into existence. Through the recreation of the earth's atmosphere, etc, they have succeeded in witnessing the spontaneous creation of amino acids, which are the building blocks of life. Stands to reason, that this is pretty good evidence. Much more significant than some book.
Now, don't take any of this as being an insult to anyone's faith, because insult was not intended, just the presentation of factual evidence to support my case. I myself am Buddhist, but I have the utmost respect for people and their religions, whatever they may be.