Staredit Network

Staredit Network -> Terrain -> Remember 9/11 Bound
Report, edit, etc...Posted by fritfrat(U) on 2006-09-08 at 17:14:54
This is not a serious discussion forum, this is about his map. Take your rediculous theories elsewhere.

Even though the subject matter is a very painful subject, I think there isn't anything wrong with making a map out of it.. as long as it's made really well. A nub bound would kind of be insulting, lol, but I doubt that's the case here.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Kashmir on 2006-09-08 at 17:49:36
QUOTE
Take your rediculous theories elsewhere.

So your saying that a government proven to have tendancies to harm its own citizens to make way for its own agenda having to do with 9/11 is rediculous...

How can that be more rediculous then 19 men in caves making NORAD stand down for the first time in its 50 years of operation. Or the fact that Andrews Airforce Base, having 2 combat ready squadrons could not fly 10 miles to Washington D.C. within the timespace of an hour and around 30 minutes... ITs ludicrous. But of course, your mind is so warped with propaganda that you can't understand that.

If you can prove everything in that big lie document is false, I will literally paypal $30 bucks over to you. But then again.. you can't.

ABOUT THE MAP:
I think the terrain is good except for the flames at the bottom, they just didn't seem right in that picture for some odd reason.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Dada on 2006-09-08 at 19:52:32
I kinda like the idea Devlin gave! tongue.gif

Chrisp i love this map it looks completly awsome i want you to finish it soon...

QUOTE(Kashmir @ Sep 8 2006, 02:56 PM)
People standing in the very holes where the planes crashed into... Strage how according to you it was a roaring fire that was so hot as to melt the beams... Yet this womens body seems to withstand the heat.
user posted image

For a closer look...
user posted image
[right][snapback]557423[/snapback][/right]


Is it me or does that look like a face in the building... (not the girl but the outside) One eye in the top left corner and the nose below it and mouth is the crash spot...
Report, edit, etc...Posted by TheDaddy0420 on 2006-09-08 at 20:15:52
QUOTE(Tirinity @ Sep 8 2006, 04:24 AM)
This is NOT a dicussion for what happened on 9/11. There's already a serious discussion for that.

The picture's good, but otherwise, you have no advertisement whatsoever. This is not original, since anybody could've thought it up, but I would play it if you told me what was in it! Otherwise, I'm not even going to bother downloading it.

So far, if you want ideas, go to the IDEAS/CONCEPT forums.
[right][snapback]557318[/snapback][/right]


Wait how long have you been here?

QUOTE(Kashmir @ Sep 8 2006, 01:49 PM)
So your saying that a government proven to have tendancies to harm its own citizens to make way for its own agenda having to do with 9/11 is rediculous...

How can that be more rediculous then 19 men in caves making NORAD stand down for the first time in its 50 years of operation. Or the fact that Andrews Airforce Base, having 2 combat ready squadrons could not fly 10 miles to Washington D.C. within the timespace of an hour and around 30 minutes... ITs ludicrous. But of course, your mind is so warped with propaganda that you can't understand that.

If you can prove everything in that big lie document is false, I will literally paypal $30 bucks over to you. But then again.. you can't.

ABOUT THE MAP:
I think the terrain is good except for the flames at the bottom, they just didn't seem right in that picture for some odd reason.
[right][snapback]557464[/snapback][/right]


Ha you didn't address any of the SIMPLE concepts I brought up lol

Operation Northwoods was a declassified document, if the government did 9/11, then why have it declassified? Or why not have it re-classified?

Also just look at the picture, the flames are ABOVE HER, plus have you ever been to a sky scraper before? Its freakin windy at the top, she was in a safe spot where the wind blew the heat either away from her or dispersed the heat enough to be barrable.

I don't think any fighter pilot would take down an air plane cause at that time we still didn't quite know what was happening.

Also here is a really informat video that I think everyone should watch. Good Videos
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Kashmir on 2006-09-09 at 00:28:07
Actually, the fighters/NORAD knew quite well that planes had been hijacked an hour in. It takes literally 1 minute by fighter jet from Andrews Airforce Base to DC. Windy at the top or no, your point is invalid, if the flames were so hot and burning so fiercly, then they would not be blown away, otherwise they would not have melted. You can't take away a fire and hope to have the temperature remain without dropping.

BTW, not sure if you've ever been to a woods party (highly doubt it.) Smoke keeps billowing from a put out fire. So it is very possible that the firefighters (the ones who know what they're talking about) were correct in saying the fires were mostly out and that 2 lines would put out the rest.

You also have never answered from previous threads how the 2nd building collapsed before the 1st... Even though the plane hit 1:29 hours (1 hour and 29 minutes) after the 1st and most of the fuel burned up outside the building. The main concrete core was only partially damaged. It is a known fact that once ignited, jet fuel and many other types of fuel burn quickly. It could be consumed in less then 10 minutes, leaving only the building to burn. Scientist Kevin Ryan of Underwriter Laboratory's has stated on record that the WTC fires reached no higher then 250 degrees celcius. (500 F) Imediately after filing the report about that... he was fired. Given no reason for dismissal. Hell, even NYFD Battalion Chief Brian Dixon said it was not very hot, expecially near the gaping holes in the towers because people were standing in the holes... some even jumping to their deaths. Heres his quote:
QUOTE
“I’m looking at the tower, at one (WTC-1), and two (WTC-2) is set back. Obvious-ly the south one is set back farther. I don’t recall a lot of flame from that vantage point, from looking up from the west side of West Street. People were standing out there. A lot of smoke drifting up, a lot of dark black smoke drifting up on tower one from the lowest floor of fire, obscuring the top somewhat. I didn’t see a lot of flame coming out of windows or anything.”


You could also bring up the fact that no other steel high rise building has ever collapsed due to fire before 9/11. Even though a fire burned wilder then in the WTC, on more floors, and for longer. If I recall correctly, Meridian Plaza in Philly burned for 18 hours at higher temperatures and raging over 8 floors. Here is the description:
QUOTE
One Meridian Plaza, Philadelphia, PA. On February 23, 1991 fire gutted eight floors of the 38-story modern steel framed skyscraper.92 The fire burned for 18 hours. The extreme heat caused window glass and frames to melt and concrete floor slabs and steel beams to buckle and sag dramatically. Large shards of window glass fell from the facade, cutting through fire hoses on the ground around the building. The fire would not yield and there were increasing concerns about the stability of the structure. Fire officials called off the attack and allowed the fire to "free burn," concentrating their efforts on containing the fire to this build-ing. The building did not collapse and was event-ually repaired.


You ask why they would declassify something like that? Mainly because just as all the major news firms did with the massacre at Hathida (SP?), massacre in Aghanistan, and numerous other cases, it was never put mainstream. The most any of them got was a mention here and there then swept under the covers... Then here comes Mr. I killed Jon Benet.. I still fail to see how the murder of a little girl is more important then the massacre of an entire family, a rape, and a burning of a body (which is against the Qu'ran.) It boggles my mind how you put all your trust into these news agencies who put ratings about actual journalism. I'm not just stating Fox, I'm talking about all major corporate news.

Please tell me if any of that information is wrong and I will correct it.
BTW, you probably haven't even touched the link, but check out that PDF. Very informational.

P.S. Chris, just so you know, I didn't get Northwoods from loose change (but of course, knowing you, you assumed I did and believed this video would "prove me wrong". Which of course it hasn't.) I came across it on wikipedia. I then looked up and read the entire document. I never once says "no one is to die in these attacks". Speaking of attacks, you still haven't responded about operation gladio... selective reading? It targeted schools, school buses, and children above all else. The US has the most state-sponsored terrorism worldwide. Ranging from the death squads in el salvador (known also as Reagans Freedom Fighters), overthrowing elected governments of Chile, Iran, Guatemala, Niqueraqua (SP?) and I believe there was 2-3 more. Hell, Kermit Roosevelt (theodores grandson) was the agent who personally overthrew the government of Iran. With endless funds he managed it. Our pre-emptive strikes into countries which we don't agree with... hmm thinking of that.. can anyone name the one other country that had the same forigen policy? Ahhh yes... Hitlers Germany. Pre-emptive strike into Poland after "Polish soldiers (actually German convicts) attacked a radio station to spread their messege of hate."
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Marandule1 on 2006-09-09 at 05:16:55
dunno if any of u other guys have seen it but .. i hav a very very intersting conspiricy video about the 9/11 ...
it soo happens the planes them selves would not be enough to destroy enough building to make in colapse.. in this video from an anonimous video people.. had caught a sudden flash just before it hits the building under neath the plane... insinuating that something was fired into the building just before it hit... and also to add to that.. there was a black stucture add to the base of the nose where the flash came from.. missle launcher.

+ this is the freakiest bit. in the salavging of the destruction there were no iranian bodies in the salavage .. there would of atleast been sum evidence to people being on board of it.. it seems there wasnt.

there is alot of stuff saying that this was a very very carefully executed plan.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Shocko on 2006-09-09 at 09:29:31
I think the idea of posting in maps in production is to get comments on maps. If you still want to talk about 9/11 go to serious discussion or something. Debating your opinions about bush, the government and terrorism is a waste of time, the point is A plane flown by somebody did hit the twin towers on 9/11, yes bush is fighting iraq because of it, and yes they do want the oil there as well, but debating who did it will change nothing.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Xx.Doom.xX on 2006-09-09 at 10:32:48
Ugh...^spam^

Well...now on topic.

Is this done yet? If yes then please put the download attachment in the first post. If not can ya post some progress. Its no fun just looking at a stinkin pic to show you what is happening in progress. Put more stuff smile.gif.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by JordanN_3335 on 2006-09-09 at 10:41:36
QUOTE(Mr.Chicken @ Sep 8 2006, 03:56 PM)
Its Remember the people who were lost in the twin towers
[right][snapback]557401[/snapback][/right]


Theres only 2 things about this map that might make people leave.

1.When your bounding, explosions go off, irony anyone?

2.Um we do know many lives were lost but now your becoming the problem when your posting/making a map revisting that timeline. We dont want to see Bnet full of that stuff. As mentioned several times if you wana remember 9/11 then go to the twin towers. and now what makes me angry is the fact that you posted a what I think is finished map in MIP.


Why not post this in ideas,terrain and others. Or did you know this topic would cause an uproar. If you wana have rated terrain post this in terrain.

N'uff said.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Mightybass101 on 2006-09-09 at 15:27:25
I would not play this map.

Because`
How can you honor so many people with a game? Dont do it.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Kashmir on 2006-09-09 at 17:16:26
maran... thats the loose change video. Already been talked over so many times.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by fritfrat(U) on 2006-09-09 at 18:53:44
I would personally never make a map like this, just because it would be so easy to offend someone. I suppose it's just another way to make sure people don't "forget" 9/11... it's a fine idea, don't get me wrong, I just wouldn't do it.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by EcHo on 2006-09-09 at 19:23:58
Who ever believes in "The Government Set up 9/11" is stupid. Why would the US Government destroy one of the most important currency exchange? Also, you guys just believe that because your probably anarchist. If you dont like this country, Then GET OUT
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Mr.Chicken on 2006-09-09 at 20:50:48
for the people who acctually posted somthing about my map thank you for all off you basterds who are talking nonsence about my map or is talking bs go take ur bs elsewhere. and btw im canadian so i care!
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Oo.Insane.oO on 2006-09-09 at 21:03:08
All he is trying to do is honar the people who died not offend anyone... Sure making a map wouldnt be my first idea to honar them but its creative
Report, edit, etc...Posted by TheDaddy0420 on 2006-09-09 at 21:37:04
QUOTE(Kashmir @ Sep 8 2006, 08:27 PM)
Actually, the fighters/NORAD knew quite well that planes had been hijacked an hour in. It takes literally 1 minute by fighter jet from Andrews Airforce Base to DC. Windy at the top or no, your point is invalid, if the flames were so hot and burning so fiercly, then they would not be blown away, otherwise they would not have melted. You can't take away a fire and hope to have the temperature remain without dropping.

BTW, not sure if you've ever been to a woods party (highly doubt it.) Smoke keeps billowing from a put out fire. So it is very possible that the firefighters (the ones who know what they're talking about) were correct in saying the fires were mostly out and that 2 lines would put out the rest.

You also have never answered from previous threads how the 2nd building collapsed before the 1st... Even though the plane hit 1:29 hours (1 hour and 29 minutes) after the 1st and most of the fuel burned up outside the building. The main concrete core was only partially damaged. It is a known fact that once ignited, jet fuel and many other types of fuel burn quickly. It could be consumed in less then 10 minutes, leaving only the building to burn. Scientist Kevin Ryan of Underwriter Laboratory's has stated on record that the WTC fires reached no higher then 250 degrees celcius. (500 F) Imediately after filing the report about that... he was fired. Given no reason for dismissal. Hell, even NYFD Battalion Chief Brian Dixon said it was not very hot, expecially near the gaping holes in the towers because people were standing in the holes... some even jumping to their deaths. Heres his quote:
You could also bring up the fact that no other steel high rise building has ever collapsed due to fire before 9/11. Even though a fire burned wilder then in the WTC, on more floors, and for longer. If I recall correctly, Meridian Plaza in Philly burned for 18 hours at higher temperatures and raging over 8 floors. Here is the description:
You ask why they would declassify something like that? Mainly because just as all the major news firms did with the massacre at Hathida (SP?), massacre in Aghanistan, and numerous other cases, it was never put mainstream. The most any of them got was a mention here and there then swept under the covers... Then here comes Mr. I killed Jon Benet.. I still fail to see how the murder of a little girl is more important then the massacre of an entire family, a rape, and a burning of a body (which is against the Qu'ran.) It boggles my mind how you put all your trust into these news agencies who put ratings about actual journalism. I'm not just stating Fox, I'm talking about all major corporate news.

Please tell me if any of that information is wrong and I will correct it.
BTW, you probably haven't even touched the link, but check out that PDF. Very informational.

P.S. Chris, just so you know, I didn't get Northwoods from loose change (but of course, knowing you, you assumed I did and believed this video would "prove me wrong". Which of course it hasn't.) I came across it on wikipedia. I then looked up and read the entire document. I never once says "no one is to die in these attacks". Speaking of attacks, you still haven't responded about operation gladio... selective reading? It targeted schools, school buses, and children above all else. The US has the most state-sponsored terrorism worldwide. Ranging from the death squads in el salvador (known also as Reagans Freedom Fighters), overthrowing elected governments of Chile, Iran, Guatemala, Niqueraqua (SP?) and I believe there was 2-3 more. Hell, Kermit Roosevelt (theodores grandson) was the agent who personally overthrew the government of Iran. With endless funds he managed it. Our pre-emptive strikes into countries which we don't agree with... hmm thinking of that.. can anyone name the one other country that had the same forigen policy? Ahhh yes... Hitlers Germany. Pre-emptive strike into Poland after "Polish soldiers (actually German convicts) attacked a radio station to spread their messege of hate."
[right][snapback]557654[/snapback][/right]


Ha, I never said flames, I said heat. Selective answering?

No other builings? No other buildings were hit by an airplane traveling hundreds of miles an hour. 2nd tower fell first? The plane was traveling faster and hit at an angle, knocking out the beems on one side of the building, which anyone who knows engineering would know that hitting one side is more effective then a dead on hit becuase the building can't distribute the wait as effectivally. Did you even watch the VIDEOS on that website? Yes they are long but they cover alot, I will let them destroy your theories...

And I haven't put any trust in news companies, I watch, take in and become sceptical. Oh god this liberal maturity check is tiring...
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Marandule1 on 2006-09-10 at 04:22:57
lol fine fine tongue.gif
i did say just before... in the reply
i dunno if any of you hav seen it or not -.-*
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Dragoon-elf on 2006-09-10 at 04:31:25
Okay quit arguing over 9/11 it is senseless since a lot of people have different opinions on every aspect of it....we will be here forever arguing about it and you can go anywhere and talk about it and always get an argument over the dumbest part...I went into a chatroom and they started arguing about the speed of the 2 airplanes...it is retarded. He wants you to comment on his map anyways...

A very nice job...I like the picture...and I hope it turns out well!!!!
Report, edit, etc...Posted by JordanN_3335 on 2006-09-10 at 07:55:48
What on earth is this still doing here. He is not even working on it but wants his Terrain to be rated and commented. Now we know this doesnt belong here someone move it to the Terrain section.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Mr.Chicken on 2006-09-10 at 11:40:20
Yes Goose that is true i want my terrian to be judged. And btw the flames at the bottom symbolized pain instead of putting them with the tower i wanted to show more depth of the towers and i wanted you to feel pain when you enter that game so that you understand that it was real and not something the government set up.

Thank you Dragoon
Thank you Lakai
Thank you all who are supporting me!
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Red2Blue on 2006-09-13 at 11:48:37
QUOTE
Yes Goose that is true i want my terrian to be judged. And btw the flames at the bottom symbolized pain instead of putting them with the tower i wanted to show more depth of the towers and i wanted you to feel pain when you enter that game so that you understand that it was real and not something the government set up.


-_-

Flames = pain?

I guess symbols can be anything these days. *cough*

Nobody can prove if it was a government planned thing or not.

Can anyone prove the valid-ness of the photo with the woman?
Could it have been photoshopp-ed?

Over hundreds of photoshopp-ed pictures were released. Anyone recall the photo of the man standing on the balcony seconds before the plane hit?



EDIT: R2B2 made a spelling error. sad.gif
Report, edit, etc...Posted by EcHo on 2006-09-13 at 23:20:32
:/
Woulda been cooler if it was released in 9/11
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Rantent on 2006-09-14 at 01:00:16
Moved to terrain, I guess.

Anything you may read now would only be what others want you to believe. I doubt any of us here are capable of finding out whether or not the government was behind the attack, but we do know the way government reacted, by immediately making itself more powerful and invading a country that had nothing to do with the attack. (Great defence plan there... ermm.gif )

So please stop discussing the 9/11 attack and just discuss the map.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Gigins on 2006-09-14 at 08:05:05
WTF Rantent? Why did you move this to terrain. It's no map either. He isn't making a map. He just took picture mapper and started a damn flame war out of it.

So in here and maps in production this is nothing but plain spam. Plus it's flaming initiating.

I guess you moved it here so it's in my territory lol. tongue.gif Anyway chicken is getting it.

Bye spam topic. bye.gif

» Locked, warned chicken for flaming.
Next Page (2)