QUOTE(DevliN @ Oct 9 2006, 03:03 PM)
Actually this is really doubtful. If you'd notice the turnout for every monthly map contest we have, less than 10 maps are submitted. More contests each month would make that amount drop even further.
Who used the word "monthly"? Or even the word "mapping"?
QUOTE
And I like the idea of spontanteous tournaments. I was all up for the Binary D Tournament, and the only reason it failed was because one team never responded. So if we were to do that again, I'm sure it would work as long as each team really is willing to participate.
Yeah, UMS playing tournaments would be awesome.
QUOTE(Tuxedo Templar @ Oct 9 2006, 04:28 PM)
I was just saying let users review DLDB entries freely and give them rewards for doing so (based on quality/depth of review). To keep out abusive reviews, just have the DLDB keepers apply the same process for reviews that moderators use for moderating posts.
Exactly.
QUOTE(Cloud @ Oct 9 2006, 07:39 PM)
Didnt I ask you awhile back if I could help you out with this and start reviewing?

Could I still do that if you'd let me?
Everyone will get to review under the v5 system.
QUOTE(DevliN @ Oct 10 2006, 04:28 AM)
So is the issue that Legacy and Devilesk don't want to give up ops or something? The last I remember, CheeZe had something to do with the ops. But that was a loooooooong time ago. I haven't been in an active Op SEN in a while, so I wouldn't know.
I have control of the bot as of now... CheeZe has the password as a backup as well.
QUOTE(DeCoup @ Oct 10 2006, 10:20 AM)
You may not need this system in all areas of the DLDB but in UMS its a must. Tho personally I would add it everywhere. Knowing how many players max in a melee, min & max in UMS etc.
I agree. I'll tell IP to make sure to include this.