Staredit Network

Staredit Network -> Games -> Should Starcraft 2 be 2D
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Shmeeps on 2004-09-04 at 13:30:42
QUOTE
Because noone really makes 2d games nomore =(

I do tongue.gif

I really would just be satisfied by haing an uber patch for SC, with new units and builds, a better staredit, and some other stuff anyways, so...
Report, edit, etc...Posted by ZetaDragon on 2004-09-05 at 17:52:38
Ummmmmmmmm... u say 2d or 3d but thats not a choice so ummmmmm...how r we supposed to tell u confused.gif u confused me which aint that hard to do huh.gif

ADDITION: THEY SHOULD MAKE IT 4 X-BOX it would own all
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Cloak(U) on 2004-09-05 at 18:13:15
lmao i don't really care what SC 2 be lookin like... as long as Blizzard makes it
Report, edit, etc...Posted by BeeR_KeG on 2004-09-05 at 18:16:52
WTF you meaning about as Long as blizzard makes it Cloak?
It should be as long as blizzard makes it uberly.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Kow on 2004-09-05 at 18:45:57
2.5d
Elements of both... such as zooming and such, but not total 3d rendering, as that would cause lag for our little pitiful computers. Terrain should be 2d seeings how we would wnat squares and the like...
Report, edit, etc...Posted by ][-][ //-\\ ][_ {()} on 2004-09-06 at 16:59:05
I think it should be 2D
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Chris_ownz on 2004-09-08 at 20:27:12
I have been debating with myself whether Blizzard should even make a sc2 at all, i know ur like BUT SC 2 WOULD BE SO COOL but what i think is that for 1 none would play bw anymore, for 2 since we wouldnt play bw anymore all of our beloved maps and everything would be lost, even if we did still play bw, we prolly wouldnt have any other people to play it with us. But back to the poll, I think 2D since isnt sc : ghost going to be 3D anyways? Why must we need sc2 3D as well, we dont, 1 is enough for me
Report, edit, etc...Posted by DT_Battlekruser on 2004-09-08 at 21:43:31
Yes, it should. If you want 3D, go buy WC. 2D is what makes SC SC.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by .matrix//Merovingian on 2004-09-08 at 23:09:32
QUOTE(DT_Battlekruser @ Sep 8 2004, 06:43 PM)
Yes, it should.  If you want 3D, go buy WC.  2D is what makes SC SC.
[right][snapback]69136[/snapback][/right]

I agree wholeheartedly. SC can't be SC if it's not in 2D.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by TEC_Ghost on 2004-09-09 at 10:56:47
You guys have to realize that WC3 was started back when Diablo2 came out, so the graphics engine is quite old, and from me seeing SC ghost I would LOVE to play SC2 in 3D, If blizzard did make it in 2D it would seem like another expansion pack because you can only make things look so good with sprites and I think Blizzard hit that point with SC.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by MapUnprotector on 2004-09-09 at 19:08:07
i think 2D is best but if its 3D i just dont want the units big and bulky, i want them the same size as they r now
i really like the way the sprites r now though, and its also ezier to make starcraft pics and edit stuff like for avatars cuz of 2d sprites
Report, edit, etc...Posted by KckKryptonite on 2004-09-09 at 19:19:13
3D, but they'd have to do it right.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by MapUnprotector on 2004-09-10 at 00:34:21
hey you're the creator of scrpg right? i play that like everyday happy.gif
Report, edit, etc...Posted by VoidArchon(MC) on 2004-09-10 at 02:01:47
Starcraft 2 must have better Graphics then Warcraft 3 The Frozen Throne!
More races, Like that Protoss/Zerg, and new units, and old units more interactive,
like when you kill a tank a Civilian or a Marine jumps out, our Ultralisks can trample and crush small units like Marines and Medics, etc. And sometimes an Aircraft could fly down and hit the ground, a unit, or a building, or even hit anyther aircraft when killed, SC2 should be advanced, better, more powerful Stareditor, MOD's on bnet like WARIIITFT,
And it should be 3d like Warcraft III, more camera views, 12 Players+ max, And a different unit limit (food limit), more buildings, units, terrain scemes, everything should be updated, now that would make SC2 the best cry.gif w00t.gif
Report, edit, etc...Posted by darthchung02 on 2004-09-10 at 05:16:22
SC2 should be 2d
Just like most people said, WC3 is hard to control and lags.
I bought WC3 thinking it would be really cool. It is but it is extremely hard for me to control. On the otherhand, SC is easier. I think because of that, SC is so popular, and the playing rate always steadily increases rather than decrease like most games.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by FizzleBoink on 2004-09-10 at 07:15:21
QUOTE
StarCraft maps are about as 2D as RTS gets. They're made from 2D tilesets, and thus make for very small files. A game server can disseminate them to all players in a netgame in moments


StarCraft 2 should be made in 2D but would most likely be made in 3D to meet the demands of the modern world... so who am I to argue with billions of people... disgust.gif
Report, edit, etc...Posted by €Hawk€ on 2004-09-11 at 13:58:11
I don't really care...As long as it comes out cursing.gif
Report, edit, etc...Posted by DT_Battlekruser on 2004-09-11 at 14:27:05
As long as it is better than SC1 and comes out I bet you mean. tongue.gif
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Buletbutter on 2004-09-18 at 18:30:24
I think it should be 2d. Making it 3d would only benifit the map makers but either way it would still make the gameplay suck. Keep it 2d!
Next Page (2)