Report, edit, etc...Posted by Yenku on 2005-05-23 at 12:57:41
Yea, I guess that would be hard to counter. At least they have a mineral only nat.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Staredit.Net Essence on 2005-05-23 at 14:18:50
Which doesn't really help zerg out because it's hard for them to play off of 1 geyser.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Yenku on 2005-05-23 at 14:40:14
Maybe you should put a geyser in the nat, take out the geyser in the expansions and make them wasier to guard.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Panschk on 2005-05-24 at 10:03:46
The gameplay would become more static if the natural becomes pretty useless, so i would prefer not changing it.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Yenku on 2005-05-26 at 09:45:24
im saying that he should make the naturals more useful, not less.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Panschk on 2005-05-26 at 14:37:28
oh i think we don't have the same definition of natural 
I was talking about the gas natural in front of the base, you were talking about the min only expand behind of the base. Well, perhaps that is what you have to do, I don't know without doing a series of testgames for balance.
I was talking about the gas natural in front of the base, you were talking about the min only expand behind of the base. Well, perhaps that is what you have to do, I don't know without doing a series of testgames for balance.