Staredit Network

The channel and the forums are two different things. Report flames to moderators using the report buttons on the forums. Tell Cheeze to look at his logs for him.

I didn't say he was a good debater. In fact, I think he's not very good at all.
I only liked how brave he was and how much he didn't care about what happened to him. He had some amount of logic, at any rate.

Brave? Maybe, but not very intelligent. There are better ways to get your message through than those that he uses. And they usually don't end up in getting banned either.

well for one thing usually people suck up to the moderators becauce well they dont want to be banned or hated...
well i respect everyone the same whether there there popular to the best that there is to normal posters.
but one thing i hate is angry debaters and annoying people.
i didnt care about him in the start but now OMFG hes a rotten apple.

Him getting banned really only proves his point. o_O

Same thing as far as I'm concerned. Anything not a ban is a suspension to me.


Puni was stealing maps and spamming all over the place, and all you did was ban him from certain forums. Why not ban ihatett from posting in certain forums? Because he didn't donate money?


Hah, that explains why when I was banned from the shout box it was explained to me that it was in part because I had a flaming history. I'm pretty a certain someone who is responsible for 60 or so percent of my warn remember who I am.


Did you not say last night that you ignore half your PMs? Seems rather futile to me to contact you, why should I waste my time?


Especially considering they were all in one or two topics... oh wait.


Maybe that's because people kept bringing up points he'd already argued on.


LMWO, that's a good one.

ADDITION:
PS: I'm happy with your answer to my original question, I was just pointing out a little hypocrisy.

Yeah, and I had to do it myself no thanks to your sorry ass.

Sorry for the spam but:
ROFLGG

ok yall shouldnt really fight over this...

Ihatett got gg no rm'd, no point ing about it.

First off, of course older members will get a little extra, because truth be told, they've been here longer and there ways of acting have been noted so that a rare outburst can be ignored as one-offs, how are people to understand newer and less known members when they begin to Flame and such.

This issue was in light of his ways of attacking DK more than anything else, personally I felt it could of been kept to PM's, but it wasn't and problems came through.

First thing to note about these forums, is that the general population is young. I'm actually in the older side of the forums and I'm not even 20 yet, this creates a problem for strong discussions, because, sad to say, younger people tend to find it harder to accept reproch on their subjects.

I think this is best to be left, because ihatett created a bad topic trend, and yes, it wasn't what the Moderators/Administrators thought appropiate. Remember this place isn't fair, if it was you'd all be paying a piece to view every document and feature, because someone PAYS FOR YOUR VIEWING PLEASURE! So at no point does this need to be fair for the user.

I've been here a LONG time, and I know TD/Yoshi/Mike is a good person, and fair, generally giving people the benefit of the doubt, looking for the less severe approach to situations to help everyone involved, and if he took this action, or was aware of others taking it, he wouldn't of done so without proper reasons and full thought.

ihatett was cool, I liked his radical views.


Lol, I think that's funny yet very wrong, mostly about the recently part.

Maybe you are referring to bnet

I believe some evidence is neccessary to back up such claims.

I'm most active in serius discussion, it's where I like to state my views, but Ihatett's startegy was if he knew the other person had knocked his idea out of the sky like king Kong and a fighter plane, then all he'd do was flame, avoid questions, and generaly cause trouble.


Good riddance!



Sure, older members get cut slack, because to become older members you had to behave to stay on th site that long.

Hey, u agreed to follow these rules on the site, freedom of speech remains only as long as the admins allow it. They rule, we all signed that agreement thing when we registered, so they own us all. But, because they are perfect humans (Or are the cylons? ? Man, I gotta stop watching Battlestar Galatica...) they try to be fair, big whoop, so they might have banned a guy unfairly, it was his fault for getting on the admin's nerves.

Ihatett deserved the deletion, when he got banned for, what, a week maybe? My topic in serius discussion had hardly any flames, personal squabbles, mudslinging, profanity, or off topic posts. (Some, but not a page of off topic stuff.) Ihatett caused problems, and SEN got rid of him.

Deal with it, because we agreed to follow their lead.


Oh, about Devilisk, online he's okay, when on B.net, watch out, he has quite the temper.

Tazzy is scary when drunk.

It's not a temper.

okay, nooberism.


(Condition where one can't refrain from saying noob, nub, newb, or any other word remotely sounding like the aforementioned words in every other sentance. Also pertains to one who cannot control his temper. Often flames people while using capital words. Often gets kicked off b.net for flooding.)

... it's not a temper. It's loud outbursts meant to create havoc on bnet. I don't do it because I'm mad at all.

Disturbing Trend!

The people who support ihatett are the people who posts very little in serious discussion!

I support ihatett until he is proven wrong by CheeZe

The way I see it, is that forums don't like controversial people because they provoke flames.

Actually, it's the people who play melee.

I don't support him. Don't include me in that, Ultimo.

*people that play melee 4 real.

I don't support him. Don't include me in that, Ultimo.