Report, edit, etc...Posted by Cloud on 2006-01-31 at 18:02:25
i think that it was abit harsh how his account was deleted 
RawR
RawR
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Staredit.Net Essence on 2006-01-31 at 18:02:35
I think maybe they would have let you back if you would have waited it out 
.
It may be just a dumbstruck guess, but, i'm new to this site and even I know breaking another rule isn't very persuasive to give you a second chance.
.It may be just a dumbstruck guess, but, i'm new to this site and even I know breaking another rule isn't very persuasive to give you a second chance.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Staredit.Net Essence on 2006-01-31 at 18:03:54
QUOTE(Red2Blue)
You flame, and then you act like you didn't flame so you can cast the blame on others.
Where? Care to point me in the general direction, sir? Or miss..? O.o?
If what you are claiming is to really be true, you are no better off than I. Every post I saw from you in the past, contributes nothing to the thread, and could be considered spam.
In my opinion, spam is worse than flame.
By the way: Not once have I flamed within this thread, so why fabricate lies?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Deathawk on 2006-01-31 at 18:04:27
The reason why you're told that is because you're like
I RLY LYK KESMULS HES CUUL
You don't know him, you're just doing it for attention.
Now then, I'm getting a bit off topic so I'll try and stop arguing.
I RLY LYK KESMULS HES CUUL
You don't know him, you're just doing it for attention.
Now then, I'm getting a bit off topic so I'll try and stop arguing.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Staredit.Net Essence on 2006-01-31 at 18:04:33
Flame is like hateful spam.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Red2Blue on 2006-01-31 at 18:05:45
Want me to find all the flame for you? Fine.
Also,
Read again sir/ma'am:
Provoking someone to flame you is flaming. DTBK said so himself.
Every post you made provoked us to have a say.
Clearly you do not know what flame is (this is flame right here, doesn't sound like it, but it is).
It doesn't matter how long you have been posting, flame is clearly there.
Read your posts again. Doesn't it make someone just want to have a fist fight with you?
That sir/ma'am, is not arguing, that is flaming.
Also,
Read again sir/ma'am:
Provoking someone to flame you is flaming. DTBK said so himself.
Every post you made provoked us to have a say.
Clearly you do not know what flame is (this is flame right here, doesn't sound like it, but it is).
It doesn't matter how long you have been posting, flame is clearly there.
Read your posts again. Doesn't it make someone just want to have a fist fight with you?
That sir/ma'am, is not arguing, that is flaming.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Deathawk on 2006-01-31 at 18:07:48
Okay, I hate doing this(going back on my word)
But Kellimus has said this ~ 1390392923 times.
THERE IS A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN FACTS AND FLAMES!
But Kellimus has said this ~ 1390392923 times.
THERE IS A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN FACTS AND FLAMES!
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Cloud on 2006-01-31 at 18:09:05
QUOTE(Red2Blue @ Jan 31 2006, 11:05 PM)
Want me to find all the flame for you? Fine.
Also,
Read again sir/ma'am:
Provoking someone to flame you is flaming. DTBK said so himself.
Every post you made provoked us to have a say.
Clearly you do not know what flame is (this is flame right here, doesn't sound like it, but it is).
It doesn't matter how long you have been posting, flame is clearly there.
Read your posts again. Doesn't it make someone just want to have a fist fight with you?
That sir/ma'am, is not arguing, that is flaming.
[right][snapback]417653[/snapback][/right]
Also,
Read again sir/ma'am:
Provoking someone to flame you is flaming. DTBK said so himself.
Every post you made provoked us to have a say.
Clearly you do not know what flame is (this is flame right here, doesn't sound like it, but it is).
It doesn't matter how long you have been posting, flame is clearly there.
Read your posts again. Doesn't it make someone just want to have a fist fight with you?
That sir/ma'am, is not arguing, that is flaming.
[right][snapback]417653[/snapback][/right]
two words for everyone that is trying to provoke him right now.
Shut up.(dont bother to reply against me for that cuz i wont bother replying.)
O.o mini he was double accounting? the deletion was still harsh
mini your a meanie!(j/k. dont hurt me )RawR
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Red2Blue on 2006-01-31 at 18:09:11
QUOTE
You are the members I am talking about. You cannot see the difference between a flame and speaking the truth, even if it is right in front of your eyes.
I did not flame anyone in my first post. I clearly pointed out, why they have no reason to tell me to get lost. Why is it that you cannot comprehend such an acute detail?
I did not flame anyone in my first post. I clearly pointed out, why they have no reason to tell me to get lost. Why is it that you cannot comprehend such an acute detail?
Ouch. Flamed.
QUOTE
Yes. I admit that I am breaking a rule (But you spam. 88 posts in one day? Only spammers do that) but EVERYONE here does. I admit that it is probibly not the brightest thing to do, but I came back to APPOLOGIZE. Is that a crime? I doubt that Moose is really going to get supper butt-hurt about it, unless he sees me on the other threads, which I will not participate in, until I am unbanned. Can you not comprehend that? I wish to bring no trouble here. But apparently, you are the only one that thinks I am causing trouble, by defending myself with setting the facts straight on what really happened, and appologizing to the SeN Administration and Moderation.
Again?
QUOTE
*Sighs* Alright.. I guess I must stick here and continue posting (Only within this thread, I promise) since people just do not get it...
Red2Blue.. Thank you for spamming my thread. It was much appreciated [/sarcasm]
Red2Blue.. Thank you for spamming my thread. It was much appreciated [/sarcasm]
Heh. Subtle flaming ftw.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by HolySin on 2006-01-31 at 18:10:46
QUOTE(Dorkhawk @ Jan 31 2006, 05:07 PM)
Okay, I hate doing this(going back on my word)
But Kellimus has said this ~ 1390392923 times.
THERE IS A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN FACTS AND FLAMES!
[right][snapback]417657[/snapback][/right]
But Kellimus has said this ~ 1390392923 times.
THERE IS A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN FACTS AND FLAMES!
[right][snapback]417657[/snapback][/right]
Theres a difference, we understand that, but you can also flame people with facts.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Mini Moose 2707 on 2006-01-31 at 18:11:11
Kellimus, just PM me to acknowledge my terms: 1 month suspension. Once your time is done, you start clean.
ยป Topic Locked
ยป Topic Locked
Report, edit, etc...Posted by DT_Battlekruser on 2006-01-31 at 23:27:05
Let me also get a few things on the record:
Just because Nano and Nimadude did not have their accounts removed did not mean they were not punished. Nimadude was warned and Nano is currently sitting on a 2-week suspension.
Second, I see Kellimus coming here with a sincere apology, and how do you receive him? With flame and negative statements. It was clear to me he was making a concious effort not to cross the line, and in large part he succeeded. When he does come back, please treat him with more respect.
Finally, to Moose: He was at 60% warn after 2 maxing outs, then the double account raised it to 80, and the final flaming warn put it to 100.
Just because Nano and Nimadude did not have their accounts removed did not mean they were not punished. Nimadude was warned and Nano is currently sitting on a 2-week suspension.
Second, I see Kellimus coming here with a sincere apology, and how do you receive him? With flame and negative statements. It was clear to me he was making a concious effort not to cross the line, and in large part he succeeded. When he does come back, please treat him with more respect.
Finally, to Moose: He was at 60% warn after 2 maxing outs, then the double account raised it to 80, and the final flaming warn put it to 100.