Report, edit, etc...Posted by McAfee on 2006-11-07 at 00:35:22
Good points all. I just realy hate people that do that kind of thing. But then, if we were to actualy do that to him, I would have to hate myself, cus its worse than what he did... i think. I realy dotn have all the facts on what he did and all that. Andi dont want a bunch of links or a long desription on what he did, im not going to read it. All I know, is I want him to die in the worst possible way. He is a virus who needs to die before his infection can spread any further.if he is in jail, people WILL try to get hi9m out, causing more deaths. we kill him, its over. noone will try to get him out if hes dead, But also there will be a retaliation from the people. eather way, were gunna get screwd hard
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Mp)7-7 on 2006-11-07 at 06:44:11
The worst possible way for him to die is to stay alive for a long period of time in harsh living conditions in a cell, then when he dies he dies. Just giving him the death penalty is not right.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Oo.Zero.oO on 2006-11-07 at 07:16:47
Send him to a Mexican prison and say for taking care of some immigrants were going to make the Mexicans deal with it.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by EcHo on 2006-11-07 at 11:34:44
This is bull. Saddam Hussein shouldnt be hung. Basically this is America's fault, even though I am pro-Bush. If America didnt raid Iraq, Saddam Hussein wouldnt be hung. Even though Saddam Hussein tortured people, He still led a good economy. In my opinion, the trial is a cover up for the misaction of finding no weapons of mass destruction.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Centreri on 2006-11-07 at 16:58:27
My analogy wasn't the best, but it proves a point - you don't need to be a judge of someone to end their life however you want to.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by McAfee on 2006-11-07 at 18:23:00
QUOTE(Oo.Zero.oO @ Nov 7 2006, 08:16 AM)
Send him to a Mexican prison and say for taking care of some immigrants were going to make the Mexicans deal with it.
[right][snapback]584972[/snapback][/right]
[right][snapback]584972[/snapback][/right]
Ummm..... Why would we send him to Mexico? That would be called pushing the buck. Mexico has nothing to do with the Saddam. We wanted himand the "New and improved" Iraqie government wanted him. What can we possibly accoplish by sending him to Mexico? " Their prisons suck!" Thats great. If hes dead, who cares?
The fact is, we ARE going to hang him. No way around it. I feel he needs to die, but not everyone is me. There are alot of people that are like me though, our government being one of them. When our government says their gunna kill someone, their going to do it. They may lie about alot of stuff, but killing somene is not one of them.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by EcHo on 2006-11-07 at 18:31:39
QUOTE(McAfee @ Nov 7 2006, 06:23 PM)
Ummm..... Why would we send him to Mexico? That would be called pushing the buck. Mexico has nothing to do with the Saddam. We wanted himand the "New and improved" Iraqie government wanted him. What can we possibly accoplish by sending him to Mexico? " Their prisons suck!" Thats great. If hes dead, who cares?
The fact is, we ARE going to hang him. No way around it. I feel he needs to die, but not everyone is me. There are alot of people that are like me though, our government being one of them. When our government says their gunna kill someone, their going to do it. They may lie about alot of stuff, but killing somene is not one of them.
[right][snapback]585276[/snapback][/right]
The fact is, we ARE going to hang him. No way around it. I feel he needs to die, but not everyone is me. There are alot of people that are like me though, our government being one of them. When our government says their gunna kill someone, their going to do it. They may lie about alot of stuff, but killing somene is not one of them.
[right][snapback]585276[/snapback][/right]
People send prisoners to other countries to get tortured. Like when Russia sent outcasts to Siberia.
Why would you want him to die? Did he do something to you personally?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by McAfee on 2006-11-07 at 20:02:17
QUOTE(EcHo @ Nov 7 2006, 07:31 PM)
People send prisoners to other countries to get tortured. Like when Russia sent outcasts to Siberia.
Why would you want him to die? Did he do something to you personally?
[right][snapback]585287[/snapback][/right]
Why would you want him to die? Did he do something to you personally?
[right][snapback]585287[/snapback][/right]
Nothing to me personaly, no. But people that can think of doing the kinds of things that he did (not just thinking about doing it, actualy doing it) should not be on this planet.
Think of our planet as a human body. We the people are the blood and everything else is the body. Saddam is a virus that, if left alown, will kill as any "cells" (people) as he can. we need to put an end to it ASAP. In an earler post they said something about not being a juge, even though you want to or not, or something like that. {Sorry for killing the quote} But what would you all have done? I think that he needs to die. There is nothing good that come from him being alive
Report, edit, etc...Posted by EcHo on 2006-11-07 at 20:04:45
Saddam is more like a virus in another body. He doesnt affect us at all because he had no weapons of mass destruction.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by McAfee on 2006-11-07 at 20:29:41
QUOTE(EcHo @ Nov 7 2006, 09:04 PM)
Saddam is more like a virus in another body. He doesnt affect us at all because he had no weapons of mass destruction.
[right][snapback]585380[/snapback][/right]
[right][snapback]585380[/snapback][/right]
WHAT?!?!? He doesn't affect us..... So, seeing as 9/11 was years ago, we should forget that he killed a bunch of people.... Awsome. I want to be in your society if thats how you think. Kill a bunch of people hide for a few years, and its all ok.
Am I alone on this one? I sure hope not.
And the WMD has nothing to do with it. He dose not need them, he has cunning. he use our own planes against us. He knows thats not going to work anymore, so he has changes tactics. He knows that we get our butts kicked in any war that involves gorilla warfare. So that was his plan. Get us on his land, and jack us up hard. it didn't quite go that way, but he are still being killed faster than we would have, had we stayed home. But thats a story for a different topic.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by PoSSeSSeDCoW on 2006-11-07 at 21:00:50
QUOTE
WHAT?!?!? He doesn't affect us..... So, seeing as 9/11 was years ago, we should forget that he killed a bunch of people.... Awsome. I want to be in your society if thats how you think. Kill a bunch of people hide for a few years, and its all ok.
Am I alone on this one? I sure hope not.
Am I alone on this one? I sure hope not.
Saddam had nothing to do with the September 11th terrorist attacks. He is of a different Islamic sect than Osama Bin Laden. Even Bush admitted that there was no link between the September 11th terrorist attacks and Saddam Hussein.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by McAfee on 2006-11-07 at 22:21:01
Hmm.. it seems that I got my people confused. lol. Sorry about that, but the fact remains that he killed ALOT of people.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by EcHo on 2006-11-07 at 22:23:15
QUOTE(McAfee @ Nov 7 2006, 08:29 PM)
WHAT?!?!? He doesn't affect us..... So, seeing as 9/11 was years ago, we should forget that he killed a bunch of people.... Awsome. I want to be in your society if thats how you think. Kill a bunch of people hide for a few years, and its all ok.
Am I alone on this one? I sure hope not.
And the WMD has nothing to do with it. He dose not need them, he has cunning. he use our own planes against us. He knows thats not going to work anymore, so he has changes tactics. He knows that we get our butts kicked in any war that involves gorilla warfare. So that was his plan. Get us on his land, and jack us up hard. it didn't quite go that way, but he are still being killed faster than we would have, had we stayed home. But thats a story for a different topic.
[right][snapback]585400[/snapback][/right]
Am I alone on this one? I sure hope not.
And the WMD has nothing to do with it. He dose not need them, he has cunning. he use our own planes against us. He knows thats not going to work anymore, so he has changes tactics. He knows that we get our butts kicked in any war that involves gorilla warfare. So that was his plan. Get us on his land, and jack us up hard. it didn't quite go that way, but he are still being killed faster than we would have, had we stayed home. But thats a story for a different topic.
[right][snapback]585400[/snapback][/right]
Where have you been?
He didnt have anything to do with 9/11. It will Osama Bin Laden.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by McAfee on 2006-11-07 at 23:20:32
QUOTE(McAfee @ Nov 7 2006, 11:21 PM)
Hmm.. it seems that I got my people confused. lol. Sorry about that, but the fact remains that he killed ALOT of people.
[right][snapback]585466[/snapback][/right]
[right][snapback]585466[/snapback][/right]
Yeah, like I said, I got my people and places confused.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Kashmir on 2006-11-07 at 23:52:04
Lets get two things straight...
1. He never killed anyone. He ordered people killed.
2. Many countries INCLUDING the USA have had more people killed. We have killed more civilians with "accidental" gunfire then he ever did.
1. He never killed anyone. He ordered people killed.
2. Many countries INCLUDING the USA have had more people killed. We have killed more civilians with "accidental" gunfire then he ever did.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by EcHo on 2006-11-08 at 00:05:12
QUOTE(Kashmir @ Nov 7 2006, 11:52 PM)
Lets get two things straight...
1. He never killed anyone. He ordered people killed.
2. Many countries INCLUDING the USA have had more people killed. We have killed more civilians with "accidental" gunfire then he ever did.
[right][snapback]585502[/snapback][/right]
1. He never killed anyone. He ordered people killed.
2. Many countries INCLUDING the USA have had more people killed. We have killed more civilians with "accidental" gunfire then he ever did.
[right][snapback]585502[/snapback][/right]
He also had people killed for security reasons.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by McAfee on 2006-11-08 at 02:58:44
QUOTE(EcHo @ Nov 8 2006, 01:05 AM)
He also had people killed for security reasons.
[right][snapback]585507[/snapback][/right]
[right][snapback]585507[/snapback][/right]
And that makes it OK? If i was to have someone killed for any reason, i would also get arested. End of story.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by EcHo on 2006-11-08 at 18:10:50
He could do whatever he wanted because he was a dictator of Iraq.
QUOTE
dic‧ta‧tor /ˈdɪkteɪtər, dɪkˈteɪtər/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[dik-tey-ter, dik-tey-ter] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–noun 1. a person exercising absolute power, esp. a ruler who has absolute, unrestricted control in a government without hereditary succession.
2. (in ancient Rome) a person invested with supreme authority during a crisis, the regular magistracy being subordinated to him until the crisis was met.
3. a person who authoritatively prescribes conduct, usage, etc.: a dictator of fashion.
4. a person who dictates, as to a secretary.
–noun 1. a person exercising absolute power, esp. a ruler who has absolute, unrestricted control in a government without hereditary succession.
2. (in ancient Rome) a person invested with supreme authority during a crisis, the regular magistracy being subordinated to him until the crisis was met.
3. a person who authoritatively prescribes conduct, usage, etc.: a dictator of fashion.
4. a person who dictates, as to a secretary.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by McAfee on 2006-11-08 at 18:38:17
And THAT makes it ok..... Gotcha.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Oo.Zero.oO on 2006-11-08 at 18:44:09
Ordering someone killed is as just as bad as killing someone yourself I would say even worse having another person commit your sin.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by EcHo on 2006-11-08 at 18:45:05
QUOTE(McAfee @ Nov 8 2006, 06:38 PM)
And THAT makes it ok..... Gotcha.
[right][snapback]585824[/snapback][/right]
[right][snapback]585824[/snapback][/right]
It's not like its affect you.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by McAfee on 2006-11-08 at 19:05:28
why are you agrguing about this? It's moraly wrong. It's not as bad as killing them yourself, but its purdy close. You know what? I don't care anymore. We're gunna kill him, and we are detestable human beinges for it, but nothing that we can do.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Tango on 2006-11-09 at 18:28:31
Saddam Hussein is responsible for genocide. He is one of the most evil people in this country. I don't believe in the death penalty currently, however I understand why they would sentence him to it.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by CaptainWill on 2006-11-13 at 20:18:12
It's good noose! 
Sorry, I couldn't resist. I'm not for the death penalty but I can see why they would want to be rid of him, figurehead for revolutionary forces that he is.
Sorry, I couldn't resist. I'm not for the death penalty but I can see why they would want to be rid of him, figurehead for revolutionary forces that he is.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Tango on 2006-11-13 at 21:04:15
Too bad it will definately cause more killings in Iraq. They should have got rid of him quietly, then in a few years tell about the court case they had and how fair it was.