Report, edit, etc...Posted by DT_Battlekruser on 2004-11-01 at 23:00:30
QUOTE(TEC_Ghost @ Nov 1 2004, 04:45 PM)
[right][snapback]92963[/snapback][/right]
The picture is sexually suggestive so it breaks rules of SEN.
QUOTE
Say i was do sig just focused on girls tits, that bad content?
=/ or someone head half ripped off wif blood dripping from it animated?
Or just naked chick with the quote,
Do you..
WHORE
want tap this?
=/ or someone head half ripped off wif blood dripping from it animated?
Or just naked chick with the quote,
Do you..
WHORE
want tap this?
1) Yes
2) No, violence I don't care about
3) Obviously bad
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Zero on 2004-11-01 at 23:09:23
DT im sorry but i just dont see how that sig is sexually suggestive....
Could you please explain to me how it is?
Could you please explain to me how it is?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Chill on 2004-11-01 at 23:16:56
1) Yeah, that sig is really very annoying, fierce.
2) Wouldnt yoshi's almost-nude-chick-threads (or whatever they were called) be considered sexualy suggestive? ... meh, mike is god, he can do what he wants...
2) Wouldnt yoshi's almost-nude-chick-threads (or whatever they were called) be considered sexualy suggestive? ... meh, mike is god, he can do what he wants...
Report, edit, etc...Posted by TEC_Ghost on 2004-11-01 at 23:22:29
Ummm, that isnt sexually suggestive at all, Chills is more so then mine. Maybe if mine had nipples showing, or had only nipple tassles. Ive seen girls wearing less then that in disney movies and they are rated G. 
Report, edit, etc...Posted by DT_Battlekruser on 2004-11-02 at 00:21:05
QUOTE(Chill @ Nov 1 2004, 09:16 PM)
1) Yeah, that sig is really very annoying, fierce.
2) Wouldnt yoshi's almost-nude-chick-threads (or whatever they were called) be considered sexualy suggestive? ... meh, mike is god, he can do what he wants...
[right][snapback]93172[/snapback][/right]
2) Wouldnt yoshi's almost-nude-chick-threads (or whatever they were called) be considered sexualy suggestive? ... meh, mike is god, he can do what he wants...
[right][snapback]93172[/snapback][/right]
2) Yes they would but you can't stop Yoshi from doing what he wanted. If IP did soemthing, we can't do much can we? But last time I checked TEC_Ghost wasn't an admin or mod so he is subject to the rules as stated in the official rules of SEN.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Moogle on 2004-11-02 at 00:42:39
QUOTE(DT_Battlekruser @ Nov 1 2004, 11:00 PM)
The picture is sexually suggestive so it breaks rules of SEN.
I dont see how it is, not showing nothing, wow its just bit of her skin, not like we see her tits. =/ Maybe we see things different..
Report, edit, etc...Posted by DT_Battlekruser on 2004-11-02 at 00:44:29
It is sexualkly suggestive. I don't think the aveage 13 or 14 year old's mom would like to see us on a site with this. If we saw her tits it would be porn. Read the rules "scantily-clad girls".
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Moogle on 2004-11-02 at 00:46:17
Mother can get pissed about ladies in swim suit and cout that as sexually and stuff.. =/
Report, edit, etc...Posted by DT_Battlekruser on 2004-11-02 at 00:47:50
If there lady in swimsuit/underwear and she holding liek she gonna take it off, that's sexually suggestive too.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Zero on 2004-11-02 at 00:52:04
Its only a women with arms sticking out with her armor on...
Report, edit, etc...Posted by DT_Battlekruser on 2004-11-02 at 00:54:03
Armor? A strip of leather across here tits is armor? Get real.
Btw, I wrote a description of this rule. Find it here.
Btw, I wrote a description of this rule. Find it here.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by DevliN on 2004-11-02 at 01:00:57
Well he said he would do another one so thre's o use fighting over it. End of story.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Moogle on 2004-11-02 at 01:06:01
DT, you seen the movie, King Arthur the new one? 2 strips of leather across here tits was her armor, yes that is armor.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by TEC_Ghost on 2004-11-02 at 02:00:33
I guess real artwork here is considerd "vulgar" too bad we cant have a mature forum that understands the true artwork of a human body even though this shows NOTHING vulgar. Oh well, I guess Ill start using females in sweaters. Rediculus.
Another act of immaturity by the MODERATOR.
QUOTE
Btw, I wrote a description of this rule. Find it here.
Another act of immaturity by the MODERATOR.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Zero on 2004-11-02 at 02:02:20
If some one could be kind and donte that would be great 
I will also make minerals to donate.
I will also make minerals to donate.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Moogle on 2004-11-02 at 02:31:30
Well going enter second sig and here is..
WARFARE!
WARFARE!
Report, edit, etc...Posted by TEC_Ghost on 2004-11-02 at 02:38:12
Oh and while we're on this topic, if we're trying to get rid of vulgar material, we need to filter ALL maps in the database with sexuall refrences and the such, after all, this is a PG site. We can't have children downloading pleasure kerigan off of our site. That would be blasphamey. So DT, can you organize a team to work that all out? You'll need to play every map completely through submitted to the database and make sure that its G rated so we dont offend our younger viewers, I mean comeone, we dont want to deny the parents of these kids a safe, G rated site now do we?
[EDIT] No its not, just a statement, im working on my second one now.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Zero on 2004-11-02 at 02:45:45
Tec is that your second siggy being entered into the contest if so you got to send 10 more minerals.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by (U)Bolt_Head on 2004-11-02 at 02:51:06
So no one bothered to actually quote the rules.
The sig of the girl in armor and the earthworm jim sig both are against the rules because there both too tall.
And the basic rules regarding this.
It is up to the moderators to decide what is "very scantily-clad" or not, If the moderator says it is against the rules or a complaint is filed about inappropriateness then you MUST remove it.
Threads such as the Chick thread feature a warning stating the thread is 13+.
The sig of the girl in armor and the earthworm jim sig both are against the rules because there both too tall.
QUOTE(signature rules)
• Your ENTIRE signature must remain UNDER a width of 600 pixels and a height of 200 pixels. The Administrators are checking!
• When you click "update my signature", be sure to check the signature preview! It has rulers to show you how large your signature currently is. If the signature stretches beyond the rulers, change it RIGHT AWAY.
• Images with external hosts MUST be under 100kb.
• When you click "update my signature", be sure to check the signature preview! It has rulers to show you how large your signature currently is. If the signature stretches beyond the rulers, change it RIGHT AWAY.
• Images with external hosts MUST be under 100kb.
And the basic rules regarding this.
QUOTE(basic rules)
Also, these forums are rated the same as the game starcraft, which is TEEN (13+). This does not allow sexually suggestive material such has very scantily-clad girls etc.
It is up to the moderators to decide what is "very scantily-clad" or not, If the moderator says it is against the rules or a complaint is filed about inappropriateness then you MUST remove it.
Threads such as the Chick thread feature a warning stating the thread is 13+.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by TEC_Ghost on 2004-11-02 at 02:59:36
QUOTE
It is up to the moderators to decide what is "very scantily-clad" or not, If the moderator says it is against the rules or a complaint is filed about inappropriateness then you MUST remove it.
DT isnt a moderator of this forum, he is a moderator of anything goes.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Moogle on 2004-11-02 at 03:16:45
Last Sig im going enter..
Lust..
Lust..
Report, edit, etc...Posted by TEC_Ghost on 2004-11-02 at 03:53:25
Last submission by me. To disgusted to go on.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by DT_Battlekruser on 2004-11-02 at 10:25:21
QUOTE(Moogle @ Nov 1 2004, 10:06 PM)
DT, you seen the movie, King Arthur the new one? 2 strips of leather across here tits was her armor, yes that is armor.
[right][snapback]93219[/snapback][/right]
[right][snapback]93219[/snapback][/right]
What's it rated?
QUOTE(TEC_Ghost @ Nov 1 2004, 11:38 PM)
Oh and while we're on this topic, if we're trying to get rid of vulgar material, we need to filter ALL maps in the database with sexuall refrences and the such, after all, this is a PG site. We can't have children downloading pleasure kerigan off of our site. That would be blasphamey. So DT, can you organize a team to work that all out? You'll need to play every map completely through submitted to the database and make sure that its G rated so we dont offend our younger viewers, I mean comeone, we dont want to deny the parents of these kids a safe, G rated site now do we?
[EDIT] No its not, just a statement, im working on my second one now.
[right][snapback]93242[/snapback][/right]
Sorry, I can't
QUOTE(TEC_Ghost @ Nov 1 2004, 11:59 PM)
DT isnt a moderator of this forum, he is a moderator of anything goes.
[right][snapback]93247[/snapback][/right]
[right][snapback]93247[/snapback][/right]
That won't stop me from warning you if you commit offenses.
All-in-all:
TEC_GHost's second sig I'll let go, it's okay, but Moogle, come on. YOu can see through those clothes.
To generalize, if the image was put there for the purpose of sexual stimulation, it probablly shouldn't be there.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by NeoNightmareX on 2004-11-02 at 14:26:39
QUOTE(FierceMapMaker @ Nov 1 2004, 03:41 PM)
here is a sig! if you get it right your in but if you dont then no one does. cuz there is alot of judges like moogle said
ADDITION: also neo its supposed to be blurry
[right][snapback]92848[/snapback][/right]
ADDITION: also neo its supposed to be blurry
[right][snapback]92848[/snapback][/right]
i already did judge it am i accepted?
i hope i is Report, edit, etc...Posted by DevliN on 2004-11-02 at 14:48:46
DT, I doubt that putting a CG female from some sort of RPG is meant to be sexually stimulating. If it was a picture of an actual female, not a computer generated one, then we'd have a different response entirely.
Given that women didn't even fight back in the middle ages, nor were they even allowed to wear anything other than a dress, it is hard to believe that this particular image could be of a fighter. But alas, it is for fun and has nothing to do with historical facts. So, leave it be.
EDIT:
Moogle's "lust" signature is implying sexuality. Not to mention the thing is even called "lust"...
Given that women didn't even fight back in the middle ages, nor were they even allowed to wear anything other than a dress, it is hard to believe that this particular image could be of a fighter. But alas, it is for fun and has nothing to do with historical facts. So, leave it be.
EDIT:
Moogle's "lust" signature is implying sexuality. Not to mention the thing is even called "lust"...