Report, edit, etc...Posted by KrAzY on 2005-08-15 at 11:20:00
QUOTE(Lt.Fatso @ Aug 14 2005, 01:01 PM)
HL2=almost impossible to play on console. Only XBox can handle it, and on Medium Quality at 640x480, 16-bit color.
Doom3=Similar to HL2.
Ghost=not being ported to PC.
MechWarrior=never became a console game. They created a seperate, crappy subdivision of the series for consoles.
Worms=WTF? When did that happen?
Freelancer=See above.
[right][snapback]287867[/snapback][/right]
Doom3=Similar to HL2.
Ghost=not being ported to PC.
MechWarrior=never became a console game. They created a seperate, crappy subdivision of the series for consoles.
Worms=WTF? When did that happen?
Freelancer=See above.
[right][snapback]287867[/snapback][/right]
MechWarrior is in xbox and PS2. Worms 3 and Worms Fort is on consoles, and Freelancer is also on consoles. (I played them before)
StarCraft: Ghost has a different maker, blizzard is the publisher, so the Swingin' Ape Monkeys can change their mind and put it on PC. (Not Exactly Sure)
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Felagund on 2005-08-15 at 14:15:34
QUOTE
Even all that stuff together can only play old games on crappy settings so you'd have to add a zero to the end of all the numbers you showed for it to play anything good, unless you want to play CS and Starcraft for the next year or so.
It's capable of running games like Jedi Outcast, WarCraft III, and even Call of Duty.
You could upgrade to 256 mb of Ram and run those games pretty darn well, actually.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Simulant on 2005-08-15 at 14:31:39
Xbox 360 owns all. Once Perfect Dark Zero comes out, Halo 3 will look stupid. TS3 also owns. 
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Golden-Fist on 2005-08-16 at 01:14:34
QUOTE
It's capable of running games like Jedi Outcast, WarCraft III, and even Call of Duty.
You could upgrade to 256 mb of Ram and run those games pretty darn well, actually.
You could upgrade to 256 mb of Ram and run those games pretty darn well, actually.
By cabable you mean if I only had that single game icon on my desk with no system files it could run it on normal settings. But anyway those games are all 3 years old (With exception of Call of Duty which is 2 years old! Omfg!!) So you'd be wasting your money, if you bought the same stuff when those games were the hot thing out they'd cost a lot more.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Felagund on 2005-08-16 at 01:35:49
Those games are all still extremely popular.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Golden-Fist on 2005-08-16 at 16:53:19
QUOTE(Sir_Fela_the_Wise @ Aug 16 2005, 12:35 AM)
Those games are all still extremely popular.
[right][snapback]289301[/snapback][/right]
[right][snapback]289301[/snapback][/right]
And they're Sequels, and World of Warcraft are even more popular, which one would I rather play? The old one that some people play, or the new ones that everyone plays, hmmm.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Felagund on 2005-08-16 at 17:48:13
I don't know. Call of Duty easily has an equal amount of players online to BroodWar players at any given time.
I wouldn't call WarCraft III unpopular either, and Jedi Outcast still has a very nice following.
I wouldn't call WarCraft III unpopular either, and Jedi Outcast still has a very nice following.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Cnl.Fatso on 2005-08-20 at 22:46:37
Really? Damn! Wish I still had the CD.