Staredit Network

I was useing it for the people that "Know" that my beliefs contradict eachother.

I find it funny how the majority of retards here believe they know everything that goes on through someones head.

And no. I'm not calling you a retard.

I bet their logic is as "good" as your logic in your chi/ki argument.

And no, I'm not saying your logic is good.

I find it funny how the majority of retards can't argue logically and know what fallacies are, or even admit they are wrong.

And I'm not necessarily calling you a retard.

Like god, you cant prove or disprove anything about levitation.

I believe thats the kind of answer your looking for.

No, the answer is burden of proof.

You cannot prove that god exists, and you cannot prove he doesn't exist.

Just like with most other things that are contravertial throughout the world.

Many people claim that they can prove to anyone that God exists by the things he does in their lives. Listening to them is very amusing.

Then you don't say chi/ki or god exists if you can't prove it.

Because it is impossible to prove it or disprove it.

It's all bassed off of perception and opinions.

How did that even make sense? That was a pointless post.



You cannot prove any of this to be true or not true. And no matter what you think devilesk-A-dur, you do not know everything. and yes, logic dose change with age. But you knew that.

If you fail to see how it makes sense then that is the root of your problem.

OMG ad hoc to the max!!!!1

Im sorry, I have this little thing called A LIFE! I think you should look into it. Might do you some good.

Yea man, that's really relevant. Great argument.

Now here's my argument:
I have a LIFE.

If you had one, you wouldn't have copied his name....

But I don't know you so I can't come up with a plausible argument about your life.

Hey, what happened to durk-A-dur, it seems he got banned. And it also seems Kellimus is doing the same thing durk-a-dur was doing. Hmm...

Anyway, go on Kellimus, keep on dodging.

I'm doing the same thing as Durk was doing? What are you talking about?

Are you talking about the fact that i'm not claiming things against you because I have no evidence against you?

Or are you trying to say that me and Durk are one in the same? Well i'm sorry to burst your bubble, but even Yoshi can prove i'm not the same.

And just because we "Joined" at the same time (Which if you look at the date of Gorotsuki and mine, we are a year apart -_-) doesn't mean that we are one in the same person.

And you say you have logic?

Edit: And there is nothing to dodge because i'm not the one out there inpersonating someone who doesn't even view the forum anymore. I don't need to know this stupid "Ad Hoc" junk because i'm not out there to prove to the world that I can debate good. It's not on my list of agenda's to be "Better" then anyone else.

Here:




... Yea, I specifically said you were one in the same. You're a genius.


Yes, but apparently you don't.



Rofl, ad hoc junk. Yes, keep dodging it.

If you aren't out to prove to the world that you can debate good, then stop arguing. Because you can't.

And this ad hoc "junk" isn't junk if you want to be logical.

I can argue if I wish. It is a free world. Just because I don't know "The uber 1337 skillz" of the Ad Hoc, doesn't mean I can't argue.

It seems to me that you learned the Ad Hoc because you couldn't debate well. So you asked Cheeze (Or even Drunk at that matter. And that is where Cheeze learned it) to help with your pathetic debate tactics so you could, "Strike down" people with your "new" debate tactics.

And now you try to insult me by saying, "I know ad hoc. I'm superior to you. You suck at debating because you don't know the ad hoc"

And you know what? That proves you have no life because you're out to get everyone with your "new" aquired skills.

Ad Hoc is for the pathetic, weak minded fools who need to "prove" that they are better then everyone because they can't debate properly.

And go ahead and whip out another Ad thing or another "Proper" way to debate because it only continues to show that that is the only argument you have against me.

Edit: And good job adding: "And this ad hoc "junk" isn't junk if you want to be logical."

In my eyes, it provides logic if the person using it has logic themselves. Which YOU do not.

All your arguments have either had Ad Hoc in them, or another Ad Hoc word. Where is your logic to prove our arguments wrong?

Just because you know what the word means, doesn't show the logic behind it.

Yes man, ad hoc is l337 uber skillz you don't have. Therefore I own your arguments.

You can argue, but you're always wrong.

You could own my arguments if you put your "Ad Hoc Skillz" to use.

Which you have not done so at all this whole argument.

Edit: Nice sig, too. Does it make you feel special?

Topic needs to be locked.

You aren't even making arguments.

Oh wow! Great job at going back and editing a post PREVIOUS to mine to make me look like an idiot! I aplaude you! You're such a genious!

Thanks, I am a genius.

That's how I changed my edit time to 2 minutes before your post.

It's called BBC Code, my young ignorant friend. Anyone can do it.

This post has been edited by Kellimus: Today, 11:34 AM