Report, edit, etc...Posted by Sie_Sayoka on 2007-01-05 at 18:29:46
overall good, although the placement of the eye is a little off. You should move it to the left a bit.
for the other 2 did you create the backgrounds?
for the other 2 did you create the backgrounds?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by EdAi on 2007-01-05 at 18:44:49
no those were originally screenshots from the trailers, and i "de-pixelized" them, changed the lighting (moved some shadows around on the second one), added the stars and the blown up halo in the first one, and overall enhanced the look, feel, and atmosphere of them
actually i guess u could call them Photo-enhancements?
actually i guess u could call them Photo-enhancements?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Pie_Sniper on 2007-01-05 at 23:56:28
Random thing I did...
Report, edit, etc...Posted by EdAi on 2007-01-06 at 01:04:00
major pixellation
=/
=/
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Pie_Sniper on 2007-01-06 at 11:00:36
Yes, I made it that way. 
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Red2Blue on 2007-01-07 at 06:53:29
Learn how to optimize your pictures Pie_Sniper.
PNG files are HUGE. Jpg files are small. x_x.
PNG files are HUGE. Jpg files are small. x_x.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Syphon on 2007-01-07 at 11:37:51
QUOTE(Red2Blue @ Jan 7 2007, 06:53 AM)
Learn how to optimize your pictures Pie_Sniper.
PNG files are HUGE. Jpg files are small. x_x.
[right][snapback]610942[/snapback][/right]
PNG files are HUGE. Jpg files are small. x_x.
[right][snapback]610942[/snapback][/right]
PNG files are not huge...
In my images folder I have a few 1280 x 1024 pictures that I made from scratch that don't exceed 600kb. AND there's no artifacts, either.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Red2Blue on 2007-01-09 at 07:49:55
600KB is very huge for a picture.
A jpg picture with around 50% quality at 1280 x 1024 pixel size can get roughly 100kb and still retain it's luster. Compared to a 600kb picture it's almost six-fold. Image size is important when you're making graphics. Nobody needs those 5million shades of red, blue, or green that not even a human eye can distinguish or tell the difference between.
[attachmentid=22364]
This is the optimized version of the file @ 92.0 KB (94,208 bytes) in JPG format.
The file was originally @ 588 KB (602,112 bytes) in PNG-24 format.
The JPG format coming out to 639.13% efficiency compared to the PNG-24.
You can barely tell the difference between the two.
Very nice effect though i'll give you that Pie_Sniper. Filters definitely ftw.
A jpg picture with around 50% quality at 1280 x 1024 pixel size can get roughly 100kb and still retain it's luster. Compared to a 600kb picture it's almost six-fold. Image size is important when you're making graphics. Nobody needs those 5million shades of red, blue, or green that not even a human eye can distinguish or tell the difference between.
[attachmentid=22364]
This is the optimized version of the file @ 92.0 KB (94,208 bytes) in JPG format.
The file was originally @ 588 KB (602,112 bytes) in PNG-24 format.
The JPG format coming out to 639.13% efficiency compared to the PNG-24.
You can barely tell the difference between the two.
Very nice effect though i'll give you that Pie_Sniper. Filters definitely ftw.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Syphon on 2007-01-09 at 08:17:12
QUOTE(Red2Blue @ Jan 9 2007, 07:49 AM)
600KB is very huge for a picture.
A jpg picture with around 50% quality at 1280 x 1024 pixel size can get roughly 100kb and still retain it's luster. Compared to a 600kb picture it's almost six-fold. Image size is important when you're making graphics. Nobody needs those 5million shades of red, blue, or green that not even a human eye can distinguish or tell the difference between.
[attachmentid=22364]
This is the optimized version of the file @ 92.0 KB (94,208 bytes) in JPG format.
The file was originally @ 588 KB (602,112 bytes) in PNG-24 format.
The JPG format coming out to 639.13% efficiency compared to the PNG-24.
You can barely tell the difference between the two.
Very nice effect though i'll give you that Pie_Sniper. Filters definitely ftw.
[right][snapback]611626[/snapback][/right]
A jpg picture with around 50% quality at 1280 x 1024 pixel size can get roughly 100kb and still retain it's luster. Compared to a 600kb picture it's almost six-fold. Image size is important when you're making graphics. Nobody needs those 5million shades of red, blue, or green that not even a human eye can distinguish or tell the difference between.
[attachmentid=22364]
This is the optimized version of the file @ 92.0 KB (94,208 bytes) in JPG format.
The file was originally @ 588 KB (602,112 bytes) in PNG-24 format.
The JPG format coming out to 639.13% efficiency compared to the PNG-24.
You can barely tell the difference between the two.
Very nice effect though i'll give you that Pie_Sniper. Filters definitely ftw.
[right][snapback]611626[/snapback][/right]
I have 2 15000 x 15000 px files here. The JPEG is 9.14 Mb and the PNG is 434 Kb.
It's all relative.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Red2Blue on 2007-01-09 at 10:25:52
Was the PNG file a PNG-8 or a PNG-24? Because a PNG-8 uses a different write format compared to a PNG-24; it also takes up a lot less space.
That JPG must have been 100% quality... lemmie guess... pr0ns?
Edai... are those sperm-lings in the sky?... Where are the originals? I can't tell it's a photo manipulate. x_x. The stars definitely need some work though. What's that thing to the left?
That JPG must have been 100% quality... lemmie guess... pr0ns?
QUOTE
http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/44367213/
Edai... are those sperm-lings in the sky?... Where are the originals? I can't tell it's a photo manipulate. x_x. The stars definitely need some work though. What's that thing to the left?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by EdAi on 2007-01-09 at 18:06:20
blown up halo
and those are plasma blasts from a wraith or something
=/
and those are plasma blasts from a wraith or something
=/
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Syphon on 2007-01-10 at 18:40:05
QUOTE(Red2Blue @ Jan 9 2007, 10:25 AM)
Was the PNG file a PNG-8 or a PNG-24? Because a PNG-8 uses a different write format compared to a PNG-24; it also takes up a lot less space.
That JPG must have been 100% quality... lemmie guess... pr0ns?
Edai... are those sperm-lings in the sky?... Where are the originals? I can't tell it's a photo manipulate. x_x. The stars definitely need some work though. What's that thing to the left?
[right][snapback]611638[/snapback][/right]
That JPG must have been 100% quality... lemmie guess... pr0ns?
Edai... are those sperm-lings in the sky?... Where are the originals? I can't tell it's a photo manipulate. x_x. The stars definitely need some work though. What's that thing to the left?
[right][snapback]611638[/snapback][/right]
24, they're both full quality. It's just a solid red 15000 x 15000 picture.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by HolySin on 2007-01-10 at 21:39:46
Used in a drawing battle for some reason.
[attachmentid=22392]
[attachmentid=22392]
Report, edit, etc...Posted by O)FaRTy1billion on 2007-01-13 at 02:15:51
>
Whee! The first thing I have ever drawn because I felt like it and not in some elementary school art class. People seemed interested in adding to it... so there is a mushroom-headed guy and a guy fishing.
Whee! The first thing I have ever drawn because I felt like it and not in some elementary school art class. People seemed interested in adding to it... so there is a mushroom-headed guy and a guy fishing.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Oo.ZeALoT.oO on 2007-01-16 at 15:53:43
QUOTE(Red2Blue @ Jan 9 2007, 07:49 AM)
600KB is very huge for a picture.
Nobody needs those 5million shades of red, blue, or green that not even a human eye can distinguish or tell the difference between.
[right][snapback]611626[/snapback][/right]
Nobody needs those 5million shades of red, blue, or green that not even a human eye can distinguish or tell the difference between.
[right][snapback]611626[/snapback][/right]
pff, not true, when those shades are removed stuff looks horrible.
dont bother sacrificing quality for size, everyone has fast internet nowadays anyways
Report, edit, etc...Posted by HolySin on 2007-01-23 at 19:31:11
Blah, a tree with a lantern. Laziness to the max!
[attachmentid=22699]
[attachmentid=22699]
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Sie_Sayoka on 2007-01-23 at 19:48:08
8/10
Nice lighting. I especially like the perspective on how the edges curve in.
Nice lighting. I especially like the perspective on how the edges curve in.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Doodan on 2007-01-23 at 19:52:57
QUOTE(HolySin @ Jan 23 2007, 07:31 PM)
Blah, a tree with a lantern. Laziness to the max!
[attachmentid=22699]
[right][snapback]617555[/snapback][/right]
[attachmentid=22699]
[right][snapback]617555[/snapback][/right]
Me like!
9/10
Report, edit, etc...Posted by HolySin on 2007-01-23 at 20:01:27
It's actually a spin-off drawing I did in 15 minutes (kept messing up the damn branches). It's based off my final for my art class, more specifically, the corner part. Maybe I'll dwelve into something different, or maybe I'll drink beer and watch T.V. Yeah, I think I'll go with the alcohol.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Dada on 2007-01-26 at 17:32:57
Rate mine i guess... I got bored one day andsince i cant draw very well. I tried to. 
May seem a little fuzzy but eh.... Camera sucked.
May seem a little fuzzy but eh.... Camera sucked.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by JordanN_3335 on 2007-01-29 at 20:03:46
Stewie picture: 6.5/10
Very good but for some reason his chest seems so wide.
Peter picture: 8/10
Nice but why is there a faded line in his right eye or his that a syndicate?
Very good but for some reason his chest seems so wide.
Peter picture: 8/10
Nice but why is there a faded line in his right eye or his that a syndicate?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Dada on 2007-01-30 at 18:08:17
For peter thats his lower eye-lid...
and for Stewie... well... i tried....
and for Stewie... well... i tried....
Report, edit, etc...Posted by JordanN_3335 on 2007-01-30 at 18:40:29
QUOTE(Dada @ Jan 30 2007, 06:08 PM)
For peter thats his lower eye-lid...
[right][snapback]620860[/snapback][/right]
[right][snapback]620860[/snapback][/right]
Never mind the eyelids were blurred out. You should really focus
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Mp)Blu on 2007-01-30 at 21:14:11
I made this one a while back.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Dada on 2007-01-31 at 18:14:03
Wow blu! 8/10
Your better than me at something!
Your better than me at something!