Staredit Network

Staredit Network -> Lite Discussion -> The end of the world?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by green_meklar on 2007-01-10 at 10:46:21
QUOTE
The christian states that no time and says no man can predict the coming of Jesus. Much more logical than numerical apocalypse.

Perhaps, but it still runs into the problem of defying the laws of physics.
QUOTE
Of course but didn't Mars age?

It may have been warmer in the past, but as far as I know it was still always colder than Earth at any given time.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by [SmC]DiNO-X on 2007-01-16 at 14:11:39
Its more probably that the humans will make the end of the world.
Ex: Nuclear Strike and we are over.

The mayan calendar its too old and lots of things have changed since it.
We must have common life for a while more happy.gif
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Gammon on 2007-01-21 at 13:16:20
I don't think it will be the end of the world. At least not until alot more wars occur.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by smasher25 on 2007-01-22 at 02:08:50
The guy who predicted 9/11 and hitler said the world will end at 2011, but really who believes that stuff? It'll be difficult for the world to end within a few years.

But it would suck if the world ended in 2011/2012 I'd be in University by then ohmy.gif
Report, edit, etc...Posted by JaFF on 2007-01-22 at 03:43:11
green_meklar, if something doesen't follow the laws of physics, it can mean two things:
1. If our laws are correct, the statement that doesen't obay them is false
2. Our laws of physics and our theory are wrong.

So don't give "it does not obay the laws of physics" stuff to us, we all know that there is a possibility that they are wrong. Possibility is not a fact.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by green_meklar on 2007-01-22 at 11:54:37
QUOTE
The guy who predicted 9/11 and hitler said the world will end at 2011

Do you mean Nostradamus? Because last I heard, he never predicted 9/11, in fact instead he predicted World War III would happen in 1999 (which it didn't).
QUOTE
green_meklar, if something doesen't follow the laws of physics, it can mean two things:
1. If our laws are correct, the statement that doesen't obay them is false
2. Our laws of physics and our theory are wrong.

So don't give "it does not obay the laws of physics" stuff to us, we all know that there is a possibility that they are wrong.

I understand that. But think about it. Which am I supposed to believe, thousands of modern scientists with the most advanced instruments on Earth, or an ancient book? Doesn't take a genius (or an atheist) to figure this one out.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by JaFF on 2007-01-22 at 12:15:43
QUOTE(green_meklar @ Jan 22 2007, 07:54 PM)
But think about it. Which am I supposed to believe, thousands of modern scientists with the most advanced instruments on Earth, or an ancient book?

Some random man in year 1800 (approx): Which am I supposed to believe, thousands of modern scientists with the most advanced instruments on Earth, or an ancient book?

...

The science will be advancing until humans stop existing. You don't know what instruments or theories will be created in the future, and what wil lthey be able to explain and reveal.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by green_meklar on 2007-01-22 at 19:03:45
QUOTE
Some random man in year 1800 (approx): Which am I supposed to believe, thousands of modern scientists with the most advanced instruments on Earth, or an ancient book?

...

The science will be advancing until humans stop existing. You don't know what instruments or theories will be created in the future, and what wil lthey be able to explain and reveal.

Yes, but think about it, how likely is it that even more advanced instruments on and on and on into the future will someday turn right around and prove that a 2000-year-old book was right after all? Not too likely. We will discover many more things, true, but I think it makes sense to assume a lot more currently likely theories will be proved wrong than currently unlikely theories will be proved right.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by JaFF on 2007-01-23 at 09:01:07
QUOTE(green_meklar @ Jan 23 2007, 03:03 AM)
how likely is it that even more advanced instruments on and on and on into the future will someday turn right around and prove that a 2000-year-old book was right after all?

Let's not argue about probability: the chances are not 0, that's all.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by green_meklar on 2007-01-23 at 19:20:48
The chances of the world ending due to mayan numerology are not zero either. However both are extremely small, about equivalent to winning the lottery a few dozen times in a row, so for standard practical purposes I think we can pretty safely ignore them.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by PwnPirate on 2007-01-28 at 14:55:07
QUOTE
Let's not argue about probability: the chances are not 0, that's all.

Only a very small amount of things (or nothing at all) can have a "0" percent chance. Saying that the chances aren't 0 isn't saying much. Wait in line behind mummies and ewoks roaming the Earth at night.
QUOTE
Many people have made predictions like nustrodomus or Charles Taze Russell. Though predicting the end they did. It never came. If humans could figure out the end of the world then why haven't we. Because its impossible.

I probably shouldn't bother responding to you. Oh wait, too late.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by green_meklar on 2007-01-28 at 19:17:32
QUOTE
Only a very small amount of things (or nothing at all) can have a "0" percent chance. Saying that the chances aren't 0 isn't saying much. Wait in line behind mummies and ewoks roaming the Earth at night.

Exactly. You have to be careful when you talk about zero probability. In fact, it's probably best not to talk about it at all. tongue.gif
Report, edit, etc...Posted by [SmC]DiNO-X on 2007-01-30 at 18:12:17
Now'll be the end of world because the global heating!!

in 2017 we will die!! pinch.gif
Report, edit, etc...Posted by BLISSARD[VdD] on 2007-02-01 at 10:28:23
Okay you all missed an very important fact, that our human race are a very great survivors.

Report, edit, etc...Posted by PwnPirate on 2007-02-01 at 19:36:02
QUOTE
Okay you all missed an very important fact, that our human race are a very great survivors.


Okay you missed "an" very important fact, that what you said isn't a fact.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Shadow-Killa_04 on 2007-02-07 at 03:08:54
QUOTE(Pyro-Fire @ Dec 31 2006, 08:40 AM)
Does the mayan calendar signal the end of the world is near?

http://www.levity.com/eschaton/Why2012.html
[right][snapback]607933[/snapback][/right]

Of course. Who wouldn't trust a couple millenia old and for all I know crack addicted civilization?

Meh, were just going to have to wait and see.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Syphon on 2007-02-07 at 20:06:25
The Mayan calendar didn't even say the world ended that day, just the next cycle of existence begins. I construe it as a new revolution. Agricultural, industrial, technological... What's next?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Mr.Camo on 2007-02-08 at 00:18:32
All around me are familiar faces,
Worn out places,
Worn out faces,
Bright and early for the daily races,
Going nowhere,
Going nowhere,
Their tears are filling up their glasses,
No expression,
No expression,
Hide my head I wanna drown my sorrow,
No tomorrow,
No tomorrow,
And I find it kinda funny,
I find it kinda sad,
The dreams in which I'm dying are the best I've ever had,
I find it hard to tell you,
I find it hard to take,
When people run in circles,
It's a very very,
Mad world,

Mad world,
Children waiting for the day they feel good,
Happy birthday,
Happy birthday,
And I feel the way that every child should,
Sit and listen,
Sit and listen,
Went to school and I was very nervous,
No one knew me,
No one knew me,
Hello teacher tell me what's my lesson,
Look right through me,
Look right through me,
And I find it kinda funny,
I find it kinda sad,
The dreams in which I'm dying are the best I've ever had,
I find it hard to tell you,
I find it hard to take,
When people run in circles,
It's a very very,
Mad world,
Mad world,
Enlarging your world,
Mad world
Next Page (2)