QUOTE
Eh? And why not? I don't think anybody is going to go gravedigging to bring backa love one who died in the year 1826. We are talking recent deaths.(i.e. a kid dies on a bike. His family affords the "process" and bring him back) Why can't scientists do that?
The process is pretty much like this, the doctors freeze someone about to die (and they are technically dead because nothing is moving) and then put them in a safer area or a hospital and unfreeze them. You can't freeze a corpse, move it to a hospital, unfreeze it, and suddenly make it come alive.
QUOTE
This sucks. If something is dead it should die. It just means it was it's time to go and Fate is still functioning correctly. (Fate is capitalized on purpose, I'll let you figure out why.)
If we start reviving people, it might help determine the cause of deaths, but people will use this maliciously and constantly revive themselves after premature natural death.
End result? Idiots live longer than they should. This is a good enough reason to stop this. No I'm not gonna pull any "bad morals" bullshit. This was done under good morale not bad.
Well if you don't want that to happen then I suggest
READING the article, trust me, it will stop any of this from happening.