You're sarcasm doesn't mask your childishness, it adds to it.
Your posts don't mask the fact that you have no idea what you're talking about.

On what topic?
Plus, that argument of yours wouldn't pass your own obsessive-compulsive logic tests. Try again. Thanks. 
Too bad I'm not obsessed with logic. However, it's useful for sorting out stupid arguments like this one.
No, in every argument (and twice in your signature) you bring up what you think is logic.
However, nine times out of ten, you bring up ridiculous formal debate rules instead (I guess you take after your mentor/idol CheeZe in that respect).
Would you like to enlighten me as to what "real logic" is, and what the "ridiculous" formal debate rules are?
No, because we both know those answers, and I'm not going to answer a question that was asked to waste my time.

Okay, that's fine

You know, even a gradient is full of absolute colors.
That's not even a true gradient.
None of this is true logic. It's fuzzy logic.