Why does everybody like Zerg? True they do have a very good advantage over everything for speed and they do produce those little zerglings. But come on... theres no fun in killing some one by rushing them. It's just not as fun.
I choose Terran because I can run if my base gets destroyed. /sigh/
Advantages:- For Protoss, you can easily spread your base.
- For Zerg, you can easily rush your enemies.
- For Terran, you have the best technology.
Disadvantages:- Terran: Zerg (Rushed)
- Zerg: Protoss (Protoss > Zerg, based on damage and Health)
- Protoss: Terran (Science Vessel + Massing/Explosive Units)
The three races are more likely rock, paper and scissor, rock is the protoss based on shields and have an advantage over scissor based on health. Paper is based on Terran because it uses technology that can surround or stop the rock. Scissor is based on the Zerg because it can spread attack against paper and cut through the buildings.
QUOTE(KrAzY @ Feb 4 2006, 02:21 AM)
Advantages:
- For Protoss, you can easily spread your base.
- For Zerg, you can easily rush your enemies.
- For Terran, you have the best technology.
Disadvantages:
- Terran: Zerg (Rushed)
- Zerg: Protoss (Protoss > Zerg, based on damage and Health)
- Protoss: Terran (Science Vessel + Massing/Explosive Units)
The three races are more likely rock, paper and scissor, rock is the protoss based on shields and have an advantage over scissor based on health. Paper is based on Terran because it uses technology that can surround or stop the rock. Scissor is based on the Zerg because it can spread attack against paper and cut through the buildings.
[right][snapback]420189[/snapback][/right]
That is so not true.

Do any of you play melee at all?
Every race is balanced (somehow), and the best player of their race can always defeat the other races.
And Protoss has the best technology, not Terran, but Terran has everything they'll need to defeat the other races.
Zerg is pretty hard for me to operate with as they require skill to make their weaker units able to rush a Terran choke or to kill a huge amount of toss units
But T...T can do ANYTHING because they have a SIEGE TANK.
T FTW!!
QUOTE(PCFredZ @ Feb 4 2006, 05:34 AM)
QUOTE(KrAzY @ Feb 3 2006, 11:21 PM)
Advantages:
- For Protoss, you can easily spread your base.
- For Zerg, you can easily rush your enemies.
- For Terran, you have the best technology.
Disadvantages:
- Terran: Zerg (Rushed)
- Zerg: Protoss (Protoss > Zerg, based on damage and Health)
- Protoss: Terran (Science Vessel + Massing/Explosive Units)
The three races are more likely rock, paper and scissor, rock is the protoss based on shields and have an advantage over scissor based on health. Paper is based on Terran because it uses technology that can surround or stop the rock. Scissor is based on the Zerg because it can spread attack against paper and cut through the buildings.
[right][snapback]420189[/snapback][/right]
That is so not true.

[right][snapback]420223[/snapback][/right]
Protoss can spread bases, because they don't morph or construct it but can easily be nuked by Terrans. Terran has EMP to take out protoss, and Tanks or any other explosive units will be destructive against the Protoss. Zerg can be beaten by the Protoss based on damage and health, also Zerg has an advantage over the Terran because they can overrun the base.Zerg
I like them best because I feel as though they're the simplest race to use. Although I am pretty bad at melee, I play much better with zerg than would I with terran or protoss
I use Zergs against noobs, I use Protoss against people around my skill. And I use Terran for games against pros. But I use Terran the best although I am good at Protoss as well...
I like the terran because I'm good at dropping M&M's onto Zerg expos with 2 tanks as support and pissing them off. 
If I play Melee I'd choose Zerg because thats the only race I'm good with. But if I'm to make a defense and choose a primary race to be the defenders then I'd choose Terran. No reason.
COol thing about every race is that no 1 is best. Zerg- easy fast killing. Protoss-Strong against zerg and terran, also can be used to kill fast. terran only good for ghost and nukes..
you guys are forgetting the powerful randomians. with thier ability to use all 3 races to thier will.
Every race is balanced for melee. As for defense, each race has their good units. For bounds... zergling.

As for my favorite unit... MARINE + ZERGLING!
Zerg. 400 Adrenalingsā¢. Gotta love that strategy. Just ask Exobyte or look at my backstab replays.
Zerg 4 Lyfe. There's nothing like the thrill of building 40 hatcheries and making enough units that they take up all your psi in less than a minute. Or the living heck of setting Rally Points. X.X
Well... this is all based on opinions isn't it? And it is also based on the circumstances.
Protoss. T3h goons/lots/sairs pwnz you!
funny... we all hate humans..
maybe its a sign...
QUOTE(olaboy- @ Feb 16 2006, 05:44 PM)
Terran for melee games.
[right][snapback]428615[/snapback][/right]
Terran for melee games? That race is hard to play...

Yeah I'll have to wit teh Zerg because the Build fast and there creep looks like it will devourer anthing in its path if its not a zerg. LET THE CREEP CONSUME YOU.
Toss! If you can play them fast they outpower anything. 1 Zealot=3 lings or 2 marines. I think their defenses are easy to mass as well. Cheap and efficient.
Na, most maps give terran an unfair advantage to start off with.
Protoss. Can't beat Arbiters, High Templar, Dragoons--and especially Reavers. Reaver Drops>you. Maelstrom OWNS Zerg, and Arbiters can really mess up Terran if used properly. Or just Psi Storm their workers. Completely pointless, but extremely funny.
Also, on money maps, you can steal their workers if they aren't paying attention. Oh boy. I'll never forget oa few times when I did that. My opponent's shout when I dropped Hydras in the middle of his base was SO satisfying...