Report, edit, etc...Posted by DF-fourofspades on 2006-02-21 at 17:42:36
warcraft vs starcraft would be fun, but the terrain and stuff would be ****ed up.
it depends on what you mean by "warcraft vs starcraft"
it depends on what you mean by "warcraft vs starcraft"
Report, edit, etc...Posted by olaboy- on 2006-02-21 at 18:19:07
Maybe like Starcraft run in Warcraft engine or vice versa.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by FatalException on 2006-02-21 at 19:33:43
I chose other, because I couldn't decide between Warcraft vs. Starcraft, or problem-free. Problem free would be awesome because there would be no lag, no dropping, and no people being idiots (hey, it's problem free, isn't it? 
). Warcraft vs. Starcraft would be fun though, because then you would be able to beat up those medevil guys with superior technology and underground mutations! I don't think this should have been a poll though...
). Warcraft vs. Starcraft would be fun though, because then you would be able to beat up those medevil guys with superior technology and underground mutations! I don't think this should have been a poll though...Report, edit, etc...Posted by PCFredZ on 2006-02-22 at 09:01:53
WC vs SC would be AWESOME. 
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Voyager7456(MM) on 2006-02-22 at 10:10:34
Mod Support! Yes, I don't care that I'm running 1.13e, connect! 
Umm... yes... it'd be nice to have a Battle.net that didn't check your version when you sign on.
Umm... yes... it'd be nice to have a Battle.net that didn't check your version when you sign on.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by SkuLL on 2006-02-22 at 10:45:50
QUOTE(Voyager7456(MM) @ Feb 22 2006, 10:10 AM)
Mod Support! Yes, I don't care that I'm running 1.13e, connect!
Umm... yes... it'd be nice to have a Battle.net that didn't check your version when you sign on.
[right][snapback]432540[/snapback][/right]
Umm... yes... it'd be nice to have a Battle.net that didn't check your version when you sign on.
[right][snapback]432540[/snapback][/right]
lol then the whole bnet would be messy wouldn't it?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by olaboy- on 2006-02-22 at 11:54:15
Well then b.net wouldn't even work, since two different starcraft clients couldn't communicate.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Deathawk on 2006-02-22 at 12:22:26
What do you mean?
Rome total war supports people using different versions. Games are strictly for certain patches, for instance..
You can't join a 1.5 game with a 1.3 patch, you can only join 1.3 games. It's quite simple.
Rome total war supports people using different versions. Games are strictly for certain patches, for instance..
You can't join a 1.5 game with a 1.3 patch, you can only join 1.3 games. It's quite simple.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Zombie on 2006-02-23 at 23:16:04
Anti-N00B realm 
.
.Report, edit, etc...Posted by smasher25 on 2006-02-24 at 02:01:02
QUOTE(FatalException @ Feb 21 2006, 07:33 PM)
I chose other, because I couldn't decide between Warcraft vs. Starcraft, or problem-free. Problem free would be awesome because there would be no lag, no dropping, and no people being idiots (hey, it's problem free, isn't it? ). Warcraft vs. Starcraft would be fun though, because then you would be able to beat up those medevil guys with superior technology and underground mutations! I don't think this should have been a poll though...
[right][snapback]432297[/snapback][/right]
). Warcraft vs. Starcraft would be fun though, because then you would be able to beat up those medevil guys with superior technology and underground mutations! I don't think this should have been a poll though...[right][snapback]432297[/snapback][/right]
should've voted "cant decide then that way you're saying that you cant decide between two or more options. Other option was meant for something that I didn't include in this poll.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Freedawk on 2006-02-24 at 07:20:34
Nothing to brag about, but why PS3 hook up...That won't do anything good, plus they are two different companies.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Kyuubi. on 2006-02-25 at 15:19:31
If I had to choose one option i'd choose an anti-hack realm.But if I could i'd choose all the choices...Anything that helps get rid of the problems right now would help. Adding more features and fixes would attract more players. Maybe we can add a feature where we can put images in the chat screen?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Falcon_A on 2006-02-26 at 00:33:52
anti-h4x0r1ng I suppose. Though detailed profiles could be fun, like if I could have a signature to display after I own somebody ;P. Language support would be nice too.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Kow on 2006-02-26 at 13:46:37
QUOTE(option)
aviator
I want a flying man in my profile! Learn to freaking spell!
Report, edit, etc...Posted by smasher25 on 2006-02-26 at 23:30:28
QUOTE(SuiCiDal_SoulJa @ Feb 24 2006, 07:20 AM)
Nothing to brag about, but why PS3 hook up...That won't do anything good, plus they are two different companies.
[right][snapback]433649[/snapback][/right]
[right][snapback]433649[/snapback][/right]
Well If they cooperated, or If Blizzard bought the PS3 from them (ok that's not possible but use your imagination) then that might work, regardless of the fact that they are two different companies.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Kow on 2006-02-27 at 03:49:21
QUOTE(smasher25 @ Feb 26 2006, 11:30 PM)
Well If they cooperated, or If Blizzard bought the PS3 from them (ok that's not possible but use your imagination) then that might work, regardless of the fact that they are two different companies.
[right][snapback]435611[/snapback][/right]
[right][snapback]435611[/snapback][/right]
More like Sony would buy Blizzard.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by bipss on 2006-03-02 at 05:59:33
QUOTE(Zycorax @ Feb 15 2006, 10:36 AM)
Anti-hack realm would have been nice and problem free battle.net would be nice aswell :)
I would absolutely NOT add MSN smileys, they sux, SEN smileys ftw :D
[right][snapback]427714[/snapback][/right]
I would absolutely NOT add MSN smileys, they sux, SEN smileys ftw :D
[right][snapback]427714[/snapback][/right]
i can´t agree you more wineer
J:oD