Russia. Decently strong military and a long history of not caring about life. The perfect communists [/sarcasm]
Well, Russia still, but I can't think of a reason beyond that it's the largest on earth and has many resources (oil, water(which would be bought by other countries when it starts to run out)) and it's my home country.
I have to say RUssia as well. Tons of room to build factorys/silos/facilities. And it's location allows easy access into Alaska, CHina, Japan, North Middle East, and Eastern Europe.
But isnt Russia going through poverty?
Wellall those people posting Canada must either live there or not think on their own. Canada has no offensive military.
Russia isn't doing well currently, but its improving. The government is starting to spend its vast amount of cash it got from selling resources on the country instead of hoarding it. And its getting, bit by bit, closer to democracy. And when all these changes occur, guess who's world leader? Russia
. Well, or China, but since I'm Russian I'll still vote for Russia.
QUOTE(WoAHorde2 @ Oct 30 2006, 05:09 PM)
Wellall those people posting Canada must either live there or not think on their own. Canada has no offensive military.
[right][snapback]581114[/snapback][/right]
If Canada took over the world it wouldn't need a military. It would own the world.
EVIL TYPOS
Russia is currently exporting natural gas and fossil fuel right? Is that how they are improving their economics?
Also, Canada, In my opinion has a decent Air Force, Am i right?
I am looking more towards money, this is why I chose Europe, them and the U.S. together would have the highest economy above any other three countries combined. We could buy a good air force! lol
I chose Canada (it doesn't say which country you think would have the best chance of taking over the world, it says which country would you want to) because Canadians seem friendly, lenient, and they speak English . Although if the US had been an option I would've chosen it. QUOTE(NerdyTerdy @ Oct 30 2006, 08:16 PM)
I chose Canada (it doesn't say which country you think would have the best chance of taking over the world, it says which country would you want to) because Canadians seem friendly, lenient, and they speak English . Although if the US had been an option I would've chosen it.[right][snapback]581166[/snapback][/right]
If they are friendly, they wouldnt take over the world, would they?
QUOTE(EcHo @ Oct 30 2006, 06:30 PM)
If they are friendly, they wouldnt take over the world, would they?
[right][snapback]581174[/snapback][/right]
QUOTE
If you had to choose one of these country to take over earth, which would it be?
In otherwords, if it was YOUR choice, not the country's.
What do you think would be better, getting a rich country or getting a country with a massive military? I think that money would be great, then you could pay for the massive tanks that could win over any military, also having the technology to win.
US + Asia > US + Europe because
Tech + Resource = Super Rich Duper Quadroples Rich Economy
Eco + Eco = Still to fail against resources which have more value.
And the Europe hates the U.S.
Well Asia isnt even a choice up there. and it really doesnt matter if Europe hates the U.S. We are gonna take them over, so eventually they will love us because they have no choice, we own them.
OH and. almost all of russian lands are unuseable.
Yes, this means that we just have a bunch of land. If we took something like Europe is is rich with people already living on it, though crowded. Theonly thing a bunch of land would do would spread out everything, and an area to test bombs.
Europe doesnt Hate The USA.
Also 7-7, rephrase your statement.
QUOTE(Lithium @ Oct 31 2006, 07:14 AM)
OH and. almost all of russian lands are unuseable.
[right][snapback]581354[/snapback][/right]
How so?
The lands Russia has from north to north east, it is a tundra land... and you can't use a tundra land and if it's not Tundra, it's a hell of a cold area for most areas.
Not saying completely useless. You could drain all the resources from it. and then it would be REALLY useless.
QUOTE(Lithium @ Oct 31 2006, 05:49 PM)
The lands Russia has from north to north east, it is a tundra land... and you can't use a tundra land and if it's not Tundra, it's a hell of a cold area for most areas.
[right][snapback]581516[/snapback][/right]
It doesnt mean its unusable, its rather unlivable.
Less then 30% of Russia is tundra, and that's still more usable land then any other country. The cold areas, you get used to them.
Russia is also good if you have an army invading. For example, if they push you into the Trunda, you have the advantage. Why you may ask? Well ;
~ Your used to the cold more than the invading army.
~ You are entrenched in the Tundra, and a good amount if Moutnainous/Hilly.
~ You know the land better than the invaders.
~ RUssian Winters are deadly to unexpecting army.
Russia also has tons of resources, espcially a good amount IN the Tundra. And the Tundra isn't unlivable, it's just a hard place to live in.
Russia beated Napoleon lol.
QUOTE
The lands Russia has from north to north east, it is a tundra land... and you can't use a tundra land and if it's not Tundra, it's a hell of a cold area for most areas.
And what do you know about tundra?
I live at the top of a hill overlooking a tundra.. I know people who have built houses on tundra, and it works great for cooling storage areas. It's a resource in many respects.