Staredit Network

Staredit Network -> Miscellaneous -> The Person Below me is a....
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Xx.Doom.xX on 2006-07-18 at 07:52:29
No, but ur prob dumb like that and u do it tongue.gif

Have u ever gotten like 50-60 minerals from a newbie and he said he gave em to u because ur his idol?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Mp)7-7 on 2006-07-18 at 10:34:25
no, but I got 60 from you for making that sig! biggrin.gif

Have you ever gave anybody minerals because they were your idol?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Xx.Doom.xX on 2006-07-18 at 10:53:28
Nope, only if they're A Uber1337 ownage programmer or map maker. biggrin.gif

Have u ever ran around the house naked-Outside??
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Snipe on 2006-07-18 at 11:43:54
Well since everyone is different, and we all live in different environments with parents, temperature, duties that out minds mold to that way of life. It's really based on your genes,traits and way of thought, where i believe it mostly comes from.

I wasn't fully sure of the question.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Snipe on 2006-07-18 at 11:46:53
I think cloning would be cool if they were able to master it. It could be used for good. I don't like what it is based on, and i would not like cloning of humans. How would they be born with a soul? How weird would it be to be around a cloned animal. Well anyways, I think cloning would be a good thing so if you lose a dog you love to much or he is dying, you could clone him and be together again. Or you could just buy the same dog species... I think it goes bad and good for this subject.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Vi3t_X on 2006-07-18 at 11:53:06
QUOTE(Toa1337 @ Jul 16 2006, 01:44 AM)
Im way for cloning, But if you cloned adolf hilter for example, They wouldnt be the same person, They'd have a diffrent personality.

Cloning is a good thing, Give me reasons why its not.

[right][snapback]524634[/snapback][/right]


Hitler eh? "runs around house with a nazi flag"

but seriously cloning is good u get stabbed in the eyes ur blind it gets repaired

sum people cut u up into little pieces then u see angel.gif ... all of a sudden u jump back down and ur on ur feet it would be strange but that way we could bring einstine back and kill him and revive him and u get the point
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Chronophobia on 2006-07-18 at 13:10:31
I am for cloning, you can't make the exactly same personality if the person isn't living in an exact copy of the "original" persons life. It's all about enviroment, how people is built up is a different thing.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Richan on 2006-07-18 at 14:16:20
I'd like to test my map, but I need help as my map needs at least 3 players. This said, if you live in Europe and want to test my map, PM me and I'll arrange a meeting in Battle.net. It'll surely be in the evening(European time)/morning(American time), which is when I hope to have my map finished.

See ya! wink.gif

Richan
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Killer_Kow(MM) on 2006-07-18 at 15:45:45
Gah.. Not enough time to finish my map. I've given up.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Mini Moose 2707 on 2006-07-18 at 15:48:24
Yeah, I tried to make a map in 32 hours once. It was horrendous.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by TheDaddy0420 on 2006-07-18 at 15:54:00
QUOTE(Kashmir @ Jul 12 2006, 10:50 AM)
Hmm looksl ike the CNN link is down... no matter, I'm about to show you why I pwn you at computers and searching.

http://www.zogby.com/search/ReadNews.dbm?ID=855
http://www.reopen911.org/Zogby.htm
http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/polit...ll-results.html

Figured I'd add that.... tongue.gif
http://www.frugalfun.com/failed-to-act.html

ADDITION:
Turns out, the article CNN had, was basicly a copy of the zogby poll.

We killed their people, its only natural they would want to kill ours. So as I said, in a way justice was dealt. They go on the eye for an eye strategy. We raped and killed their women, murdered their people in massacres, planted weapons to cover-up. I'm sure even I would not let them get away with it. If the only way to hurt them is on their home soil, then so be it.
[right][snapback]522671[/snapback][/right]


Euro, I need to ask you a very important question.

Do you support our troops? (as in if your American)
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Killer_Kow(MM) on 2006-07-18 at 15:55:25
32 hours isn't much to me... I'm a very lazy person. Of 32 hours I'd probably work for 30 minutes.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Mp)7-7 on 2006-07-18 at 15:55:45
This is why I think we would save more lives if we just ran through and killed them as fast as possible and not worrying that much about innocent civilians. Yes dont just shoot them but just dont take so much time. More innocent civilians are being killed from other Iraquis just trying to show the U.S. that they still have power. There gonna die anyway just get rid of the enemy as fast as possible!
Report, edit, etc...Posted by TheDaddy0420 on 2006-07-18 at 16:03:17
I thought/heard Jordan and Syria support the terrorist groups in Lebenonn

QUOTE(Kashmir @ Jul 17 2006, 02:53 AM)
incredibly stupid joke above...

Total bullcrap with absolutely no water. Iran has the resources to engage and defeat the US. (At least in IRan.) Maybe not in a foriegn country but you didn't specify.
[right][snapback]525237[/snapback][/right]


Hahahahahahahahaha YEA OK.
We have better soldiers, better eqiupment, better commanders (battle hardened from Iraq and Aphganistan), better Armor, better tanks, better planes, the list goes on and on.

Now if you try and bring in the stupid "zomg like vietnam we had better crap!" Well I just have to say the vietnamese were better soldiers back then. I mean I have read books, those dudes were bad mo fos.

Also our Army spread too thin?
QUOTE
Approximately 1.4 million personnel are currently on active duty in the military with an additional 860,000 personnel in the seven reserve components (456,000 of which are in the Army and Air National Guard)

So we got about 138,000 or so men in Iraq. Im guessing but I do not know the exact amount so correct me if Im wrong in saying we got about 90,000 men in Afghanistan.

We got like 2,400 in South Korea. Thats only 320,000 troops around the world, we got about 680,000 and more just chilling in their combat rotation in the States.

And your saying we are stretched too thin?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Killer_Kow(MM) on 2006-07-18 at 16:06:25
They didn't have better men, they just used a different stratagey that the US wasn't prepared for.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by TERRAINFIGHTER on 2006-07-18 at 16:09:51
It sounds like it's about to be over, and what a surprise, it's causing a big storm as it comes back!
(I predicted the big storm when it started tongue.gif )

PHILADELPHIA - Even in black pants, a black vest and long-sleeved shirt, Amish flower vendor David Stoltzfus had no complaints about working outdoors Tuesday as the stagnant air simmered at close to 100 degrees.

"I do it every day, work in warm weather," said Stoltzfus, who came from his farm in Lancaster County to sell flowers near Philadelphia's Rittenhouse Square. "We're fine. I'm comfortable."

But he was among the few people not complaining about the heat wave that has gripped much of the nation with temperatures in the 90s and 100s since the weekend. Cities cross the country took steps to ease the health threat and conserve energy.

In New York City, the mayor ordered city offices to turn off unnecessary lights. In Pennsylvania, swimming pools stayed open late and summer school classes were dismissed early.

In Washington Square Park in Manhattan, sweaty residents cheered when a large fountain shot on and started wading in the ankle-deep water. No one worried about whether it was dirty.

"It's too hot to care about that stuff right now," said Alex Glowacki of Brooklyn. "And anyway, it doesn't look all green and slimy like it usually does, so I feel OK without shoes on."

The thermometer hit 93 degrees by 1 p.m. in Central Park, the
National Weather Service said. The heat index, measuring the combined effects of heat and humidity, was expected to reach 104.

Heat advisories and warnings were lifted for much of Pennsylvania, except for the southeastern portion that includes Philadelphia. Parts of the Midwest also got a little relief from a Canadian cool front. The 8 a.m. temperature in Milwaukee was 65, compared with 76 at the same time Monday.

The Northeast could get a break starting Tuesday night, with scattered showers and thunderstorms expected for parts of the region, but the heat was likely to persist in the southern Plains until Friday. Forecasts in Nebraska called for temperatures around 110 degrees Wednesday.

At least four deaths have been blamed on the sweltering heat, and the weather is suspected in at least three others.

In New York, Mayor Michael Bloomberg reminded residents to conserve electricity. He directed City Hall to do its part: Only natural light filtered into the rotunda Tuesday, and some passageways and rooms were dark.

"There's plenty of light coming through the windows — you don't have to keep the lights on — and if everybody did some of that, that would really save some electricity," the mayor said.

Jennifer Caban, 16, of Queens, said she cranked up the air conditioning in her home until it broke. So she was sitting in the shade. "It was the worst night's sleep I ever had," she said. "I woke up and there was a pool of sweat on my pillow."

Relief could not come soon enough for many people working outdoors.

In Newark, N.J., bicycle patrolman Manuel Arias' wore a uniform of black pants and a helmet as temperatures climbed well into the 90s.

"I'm on my fifth bottle," he said. "Yesterday, I drank 15 bottles."

The heat was blamed for the death of a Philadelphia woman found in her home on Monday, and outreach workers continued to check on homeless and elderly people. The city closed summer school at 11 a.m. again on Tuesday in buildings without air conditioning.

Utilities set records for electricity usage, and in Connecticut health departments advised people without air conditioning to cool off in senior centers, malls and movie theaters.

"If I see sprinklers or hydrants, I just drench myself," said New Haven, Conn., letter carrier Ceferino Roman, who walked his route in 20-minute intervals, taking breaks in between. "This is the worst."

In cities such as Allentown and Hartford, Conn., swimming pool hours were extended and sometimes fees were waived.

Transportation officials in Connecticut monitored the overhead lines that power some commuter trains to New York City because the cables tend to sag in extreme heat, causing delays.

The heat killed a 76-year-old Oklahoma City man in a house where the air conditioner was broken, officials said Tuesday. Three other deaths in Oklahoma were believed to be linked to the heat.

___

Associated Press Writers Colleen Long in New York; Maryclaire Dale in Philadelphia; Stephanie Reitz in Hartford, Conn.; Matt Apuzzo in New Haven, Conn.; Janet Frankston and Jeffrey Gold in Newark, N.J.; and Sean Murphy in Oklahoma City contributed to this report.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by KaboomHahahein on 2006-07-18 at 16:09:54
Yes this heat is pretty annoying but good thing it cooled down today, but it's going to go back up tomorrow. I have no air conditioning at my house so I've been sleeping/living in my basement since friday. This year is better than last year, we had 14 heat wave warnings last year.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Mp)7-7 on 2006-07-18 at 16:14:40
I am not sure if I will be able to finish mine either, too much procrastination and laziness finally are taking a toll on me. lol, I have a 75% chance of finishing it, just depends if I have to work or not tomorrow too.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Voyager7456(MM) on 2006-07-18 at 16:16:20
Iran is not as helpless as you think. They may not be able to completely stop a US invastion, but they certainly could make the US pay for attacking them.

QUOTE(iranbodycount.org)
US action to pre-empt obvious Iranian responses, such as affecting tanker traffic through the Straits of Hormuz or moving Revolutionary Guard elements into parts of Iraq, could well mean that there would be immediate if apparent indications of comprehensive US military success in doing serious damage both to Iran’s presumed nuclear weapons development potential and in countering immediate Iranian responses. This could turn out to be as misleading as the early apparent successes in Iraq following regime termination within three weeks of the start of that war in March 2003. In fact, Iran has many options available in response, even if they are not options of immediate effect.

Straits of Hormuz: While one major aim of any US military action would be to forestall Iranian interference with Gulf oil exports, this would have to be near total in its effect on Iranian capabilities. This would be difficult if not impossible to achieve, leading to a fear of attack which alone would have a formidable impact on oil markets.

West Gulf oil facilities: Furthermore, it would be possible for paramilitary units linked to Iran to develop the ability to sabotage oil export facilities in western Gulf states such as Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. High levels of security would undoubtedly be maintained in these states, yet determined paramilitary groups would be difficult to control with certainty. Even one or two incidents of sabotage would raise tensions and further affect oil markets.

Revolutionary Guard: The Revolutionary Guard remains a strong if largely free-standing component of the Iranian defence system. While its facilities on the Persian Gulf coast and close to the border with Iran might be damaged in the early waves of US attacks, there would also be a very substantial base of support for the Guard, expressed by immediate improvements in morale, a greatly enhanced ability to recruit, and a determination to respond. Although US military action against Guard facilities might be undertaken to “warn off” the Guard from interfering in Iraq, the effect would almost certainly be shortlived, and the numerous links which already exist between Guard units and Iraqi Shi’a militias would be activated rapidly. Such demonstrable Iranian involvement in the Iraqi insurgency would result in an escalating US military response involving cross-border attacks on Iranian logistics. This would increase Iranian civilian casualties, cause economic disruption and also further increase internal Iranian support for the current regime.

Overall, and given the nature of the Iran/Iraq border, Iran would be in a very strong position to aid elements of the Iraqi insurgency in numerous ways, providing a wide range of armaments as well as personnel. This would give a substantial boost to an insurgency that, even three years after the termination of the old regime, is as active as ever.

International support: Given recent major long-term economic agreements between Iran and China, and also between Iran and India, as well as close links with Russia, a US attack would attract major criticisms, including from two of the five permanent members of the UN Security Council – China and Russia. The current Russian administration might prefer privately to see US military action avoided, but it would be in a very difficult position in relation to many of its neighbouring allies if it were not to condemn US military action against Iran most strongly, especially if this escalated to a protracted conflict.



The site is about the US attacking Iran to stop it from obtaining nuclear weapons, but I think the Iranian responses section is relevant here.

QUOTE
As of January 2005, there are some 250,000 soldiers, sailors, airmen, Marines, and Coast Guardsmen deployed in support of combat, peacekeeping, and deterrence operations. This figure does not include those forces normally present in Germany, Italy, the United Kingdom or Japan unless bases at those locations are actively supporting a combat operation. Furthermore, tours of duty in these locations are routine and not considered hardship tours. If one were to include these forces the number of deployed troops worldwide would be around 350,000.


Not to mention, troops need to be kept at home...
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Voyager7456(MM) on 2006-07-18 at 16:22:32
I'm defenitely not going to finish mine. A corrupted map put me back too far. Plus I'm lazy. tongue.gif
Report, edit, etc...Posted by TheDaddy0420 on 2006-07-18 at 16:23:43
QUOTE(Killer_Kow(MM) @ Jul 18 2006, 12:06 PM)
They didn't have better men, they just used a different stratagey that the US wasn't prepared for.
[right][snapback]526284[/snapback][/right]


Dude read some factual vietnam books. Many lived in tiny tunnels and only ate cold small portions of rice. They were much tougher soldiers then ours. Now we could give it to them that they had "the jungle" as a mighty weapon, so maybe in any other environment they would have lost.

ADDITION:
QUOTE(Voyager7456(MM) @ Jul 18 2006, 12:15 PM)
Iran is not as helpless as you think. They may not be able to completely stop a US invastion, but they certainly could make the US pay for attacking them.
The site is about the US attacking Iran to stop it from obtaining nuclear weapons, but I think the Iranian responses section is relevant here.
Not to mention, troops need to be kept at home...
[right][snapback]526303[/snapback][/right]


You know thats what they said about the Republican Gaurd in Iraq. And guess what happened to them?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Voyager7456(MM) on 2006-07-18 at 16:26:09
QUOTE(TheDaddy0420 @ Jul 18 2006, 04:23 PM)
ADDITION:
You know thats what they said about the Republican Gaurd in Iraq.  And guess what happened to them?
[right][snapback]526304[/snapback][/right]


They formed an insurgency that's killed 2,552 American troops, countless civillians and continues to destabilize the region and create anti-American sentiment throughout the Middle East?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Killer_Kow(MM) on 2006-07-18 at 16:41:04
A corrupted, BUGGED map, you mean.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by yoni45 on 2006-07-18 at 17:37:34
QUOTE(Voyager7456(MM) @ Jul 18 2006, 02:25 PM)
They formed an insurgency that's killed 2,552 American troops, countless civillians and continues to destabilize the region and create anti-American sentiment throughout the Middle East?
[right][snapback]526308[/snapback][/right]


2 552 american troops in over 3 years, out of over 100 000 troops stationed there...

That's a lower death rate than in the united states itself wink.gif

As a matter of fact, believe it or not, of the last 4 presidents, during the terms of George Bush, the US has had the smallest amounts of military personnel die, with the exception of clinton... wink.gif

http://www.murdoconline.net/archives/003564.html
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Voyager7456(MM) on 2006-07-18 at 18:49:18
During his first term. I would expect that with the amount of violence we've seen in the past 2 years, the number will increase.

Not to mention the 40,000+ Iraqi civillians killed as a result of that war.
Next Page (145)