End of discussion. You go on believe what you want to believe. Far be it from me to hold you back from doing anything foolish.
I've got more important things to do than waste my time arguing with someone who has the brain of a rock. And the mental capacity of a piece of wood.
Lol I love religious people. Good practice for pointing out flaws in their arguments. Even if they never admit they have lost the argument.
Go on and live life devilesk, it's right before you, even if it's hard to see. And who knows if they are truly right? Something could easily come along and challenge all of that. Such is the lesson of true complacency.
It's easy to say, I KNOW I'M RIGHT. I'll bet when you and your parents argue, you have the same feeling. This thread has really downgraded. Disagreement is natural, but only the arrogant/ignorant are convinced they're perfectly right. I easily say the same thing to you. " I KNOW THAT GOD EXISTS. i'VE FELT WHAT YOU HAVEN'T." Just because you've not tasted salt doesn't mean salt has no taste. I've tasted. I know.
See my earlier blue sky analogy as well.
Okay, so devilesk agrees with Abortion Madness. Does anybody else? I'm pretty sure deathknight does.
I know that I am right in this argument, because your argument has failed, and if you fail to see that it's not my problem. Most of the people here are just like you anyway, they don't know what they are talking about, or how to argue.
QUOTE
Lol I love religious people. Good practice for pointing out flaws in their arguments. Even if they never admit they have lost the argument.
And I'm not that religious. I just think abortion is most cases is wrong. But if you can come up with a good argument and prove me wrong that abortion is always right all the time, I'll consider it. You don;t get as far trying to insult someone, rather than listening to them.
ADDITION:
QUOTE
I know that I am right in this argument, because your argument has failed, and if you fail to see that it's not my problem. Most of the people here are just like you anyway, they don't know what they are talking about, or how to argue.
You mean people like you? Good to know, devilesk.
Ha ha, I'm so funny. I'm always right. I just know it because, shoot, I guess I'd better be right. I can't prove God exists, therefore, he doesn't.
Just like no one can actually prove that evolution happened. Sure there's evidence, but absolutely no proof. That's why it's called a theory.
Interestingly there is a significant amount of evidence against evolution. But we already know we're right, so why bother researching the other side. I'd only get confused.
Devilesk, since you've been confused in the past with my sarcasm, I will label this:
Most of this post is SARCASTIC.
With every post you prove even more how I won:
QUOTE
I know that I am right in this argument, because your argument has failed, and if you fail to see that it's not my problem. Most of the people here are just like you anyway, they don't know what they are talking about, or how to argue.
QUOTE
Ha ha, I'm so funny. I'm always right. I just know it because, shoot, I guess I'd better be right. I can't prove God exists, therefore, he doesn't.
Just like no one can actually prove that evolution happened. Sure there's evidence, but absolutely no proof. That's why it's called a theory.
Interestingly there is a significant amount of evidence against evolution. But we already know we're right, so why bother researching the other side. I'd only get confused.
You're funny because you haven't read anything in the other pages regarding the actual argument.
I didn't realize there was anything to win?
QUOTE(SuperToast @ Aug 12 2005, 03:16 PM)
I didn't realize there was anything to win?
[right][snapback]286486[/snapback][/right]
me 2
QUOTE
An ad hominem argument, also known as argumentum ad hominem (Latin, literally "argument to the man"), is a logical fallacy that involves replying to an argument or assertion by addressing the person presenting the argument or assertion rather than the argument itself.
Do you know what the above quote means, devilesk?
QUOTE
Lol I love religious people. Good practice for pointing out flaws in their arguments. Even if they never admit they have lost the argument....Most of the people here are just like you anyway, they don't know what they are talking about, or how to argue.
I'm glad you consider yourself above making fallacitical (if that's a real word) comments.
What does he get, a toaster or something?
QUOTE(darth_ender @ Aug 12 2005, 05:17 PM)
Do you know what the above quote means, devilesk?
I'm glad you consider yourself above making fallacitical (if that's a real word) comments.
[right][snapback]286490[/snapback][/right]
It's funny because you don't even know the basis for a good argument.
And if you actually understand what ad hominem is you will see that I'm not saying he's wrong just because he's religious, this shows how little you know about the actual argument that was going on.
I have read. Are you an imbecile? I've read it all. I spent ten minutes catching up before I said anything. Go whine to your mommy about how mean darth_ender is. I can't win an argument against him. I can only criticize him personally (ad hominem, see above).
I suggest a mod or admin lock this topic now, it isn't going anywhere, first it turned into a flamewar, then it turned into a topic about WWII and hitler, then Iraq, then god, then abortion. What does that have to do with EUDs? If you want to talk about those things, then go to Serious discussion and start a thread about it or find an existing one.
God dangit, everybody is OFF-topic, so I had to post this phrase from the first post of the thread by yoshi to help us remember what topic we were on!
QUOTE(Yoshi da Sniper @ Aug 11 2005, 02:46 PM)
the
[right][snapback]285112[/snapback][/right]

Please take this quote to help get back on topic. Thanks.
QUOTE(Artanis @ Aug 12 2005, 03:19 PM)
I suggest a mod or admin lock this topic now, it isn't going anywhere, first it turned into a flamewar, then it turned into a topic about WWII and hitler, then Iraq, then god, then abortion. What does that have to do with EUDs?
[right][snapback]286495[/snapback][/right]
if you read carfully, it all links up together
Yes, but this wasn't the purpose of the news post.
QUOTE(darth_ender @ Aug 12 2005, 05:19 PM)
I have read. Are you an imbecile? I've read it all. I spent ten minutes catching up before I said anything. Go whine to your mommy about how mean darth_ender is. I can't win an argument against him. I can only criticize him personally (ad hominem, see above).
[right][snapback]286494[/snapback][/right]
Thanks for critizing me personally.
This just shows how you can't show people here at SEN what logical fallacies are, because they don't even know how to actually point them out.
I wish CheeZe was here.
You know what, I am admittedly avoiding the argument of religion, and instead I am arguing against your technique. You keep personally attacking me, but you've yet to respond to my defense. Just stuff like, "you don't konw what a good argument is." Your lack of intelligence is...astounding.
ADDITION:
Admittedly ad hominemming you devilesk with the following:
"I wish cheeze was here, I have run out of meaningless things to say for myself."
You still fail to address the issues I've brought up in the real argument. Stop changing the subject and address the real issue if you "know you're right."
ADDITION:
Gosh, how old are you? No joke. I can see a lot of change in me as I've grown (I'm almost positive I'm older than you). The reason I say this is because it's VERY narrowminded and unintelligent to say "I know I'm right." It wasn't until I read that when I decided to post again. I'm just embarassed that someone would find that intelligent. That is not the way to argue. In a peaceful gesture, I suggest you never, EVER say something like that in an argument. Not if you're on the speech and debate team, not if you're a lawyer, never. You will have a good many more intellectual people laughing at you from there to the tabloid headlines.
QUOTE
You know what, I am admittedly avoiding the argument of religion, and instead I am arguing against your technique. You keep personally attacking me, but you've yet to respond to my defense. Just stuff like, "you don't konw what a good argument is." Your lack of intelligence is...astounding.
The truth is, I have not been insulting, but I don't think you can say the same for yourself.
QUOTE
"I wish cheeze was here, I have run out of meaningless things to say for myself."
Thanks for putting words in my mouth, I thought what I really meant by saying "I wish CheeZe was here" was so that he could see the actual argument.
QUOTE
You still fail to address the issues I've brought up in the real argument. Stop changing the subject and address the real issue if you "know you're right."
What real issue? You don't even know what you are talking about. The argument has been over.
Wow, I'm making a lot of minerals at this thread.
Blizzard should patch all your hands to your mouths so you can't type
QUOTE(Artanis @ Aug 12 2005, 05:20 PM)
Yes, but this wasn't the purpose of the news post.
[right][snapback]286499[/snapback][/right]
Okay, I partially agree with you, but you thinking the Hiroshima bombing was a good thing is just horrible. Actually, it was neat, but dang you don't have to prance around and say "OMG HIRO HIRO" Please stop being a racist towards the discolored asians.