QUOTE(M.Army)
Yes, but i just posted some reasons why i do in response to ppl asking me why.
Some reasons in wich
you believe. Not that they're proven or something. Just as a fact clearer. Hope you don't mind.

QUOTE(M.Army)
In case you didn't realize it but i made no new claims. I just posted my reasons in response to other posts in the other threads, someone came in with a claim, i then asked them why.
Good thing then that you didn't named the thread topic as "Proof of God's existance"...
*Sigh*And in
other thread you tried to imply that I really didn't know the real terms of English language.

QUOTE(M.Army)
Yes, Satan does exist. I never said he didn't exist. God exists, so does satan. That's why we are what we are. One made us, the other one made us commit sin.
It was only my way of saying that it isn't proven. Choose your religion and have your own fav deity entity(ies). But since you grabbed it... look the paragraph below.
So by that sentence alone, I can infer that God isn't almighty or else it wouldn't allow the bad side to manifest itself in a physical manner. Just not to say others... he created evil (read snake in Bible). Perfection isn't obtained by us or even God it seems.
*Meh*QUOTE(M.Army)
Historical NONfiction. Even though the teachings in the Bible to some of u guys may seem like a bunch of baloney talk, the historical facts they've got documented are proven to be correct.
And
only those. Like the ones that could be drawn by mere observation (meats you can eat, poison plants, etc.). The rest still lacks to be proven. Isn't science/logic great?
*Sarcasm*QUOTE(M.Army)
Just because we believe in god entirely on faith doesn't conclude that we dont understand science. They're two different things; they dont belie each other.
What do you have to tell yourself. Just my above reply proves the clash between that you conveniently let slide by.
QUOTE(M.Army)
You cant use ANYthing to refute his existance. Nor could u use visual proof to corroborates it.
Again n' again you tried to pull this crap upon us. You're the one who claims that he exists, not us. So the "burden of proof" must come from your end of the line, not ours (non-theists).
The real point is: YOU CAN'T PROVE HIS EXISTENCE SO FAR. Hence, don't try to shove that gimmick on us.

QUOTE(M.Army)
I find it strange how people conclude the existance of Aliens yet not God. Reasonings into believe either one of them are the same. If so, then how come people have different views upon these two?
QUOTE(M.Army a few posts down at it again)
Well, people could just believe that he exists, but not necesarily what he has done.
Most people say they believe in aliens because "there's gotta be something out there. The universe is so huge so why not?" Why not say the same thing about God (His existance, not his works)? And also, there's no real visual proof of aliens nor is there any for God so other than that i don't get the difference.
That would be an imense waste of space. We're exploring it now. Perhaps so time in the future it can be proven. Same as for "God".

Understood now why we bicker so much of you insisting on a "non-proof" stance that gets us ticked?
QUOTE(M.Army)
Some people are too lazy to do so. And if they just read that, they'll get the wrong message... sometimes
All I can say is... like the one you're trying to pass?
*Shruggs face*QUOTE(JohnzNoThere)
Read the whole fricking thing. ALL OF THE PROOFS! IF YOU CAN READ THIS WHOLE TOPIC, YOU CAN READ THE PAGES MILLENIUMARMY HAS POSTED!!!!
Calm down, buddy. It isn't shouting that you'll convince us. In fact, for me it just works the other way around. Solid proofs. That's what I see lacking in here.

QUOTE(Cfro)
well, i think thats been said before. nothing new.
however, in seeing that this doesnt seem to get old, i'm going to say that:
God is not a concept, but a being. and at that, all powerful and all knowing. He laid down the law of morality, and is not by any means a method of teaching morals.
sides, if there was no God, how would we have morals? and what unexplainable things do we use God to explain? like, the resurrection of Jesus? oh my, that would just prove our point, that God is real.
btw i'm asking you to tell me what "unexplainable events" you are refering to.
when you said that God "doesnt exist" and then say that he's "not disproven" i think you might just be contradicting yourself.
I was about to answer this but
Cheeze already saved me the trouble.
*Pats on it's back*QUOTE(Cfro)
well, the fact that it took him 6 days was an analogy for us humans--we work for six days, then rest for the seventh. it was symbolic for us and our being--we cant work nonstop-and niether can we do everything instantly.
I guess that the main point is: How do you prove that the world was made in 7 days? Not by C-14 dating, that's for sure.
In fact, you can't prove it, except by sayin' that it was written in a book that for all I care, it could have been written by a Jon Doe to earn a few bucks on principles, fairy tales and some observation remarks laid in the same block.
*Grins face*QUOTE(Cfro)
a) God wants us to choose to love him, or rather, he wants us to come forth and proclaim him our God and king. Wheres the gratification of making something love you? its artificial and not really love.
b) he already did that-it happened 2000 years ago. you wont believe me, but i submit that its true.
Nozumu said it better than me.

QUOTE(Cfro looking like an arse)
he does not want you to go to hell, he wants you to love him. if he sends you to hell, it will be because of your spite, hate, and disbelief against him.
Although other religions are the concepts of satan, God uses them to glorify himself through thier falsities.
Aww... Doesn't he look cute, with all that itty bitty arrogance.

Hey genious, and what does the snake in Adam & Eve part? Or even in the part where it temptes Jesus?
Don't be such an arrogant prick will ya? If you began to look (read know after searchin') things a little better, I'd surely support that concept.
Heck, I prob'ly won't be far away to say that even a couple of Christians known of mine from other forums would pound your head for being so untolerant.
QUOTE(Cfro)
Yes, God does say, "Worship me or suffer for all eternity." its true. just goes to show that the amount of time we have on earth is limited and extremely important, considering the consequenes.
satan has no ability to cause people to suffer for all eternity. he can only decieve.
Hell, I must be Satan encarnated then.
*Looks evily*Get somethin' new. Not the same ol' mambo jambo again. Glare at the above paragraph with
Nozumu's post linked for better answer.
QUOTE(Cfro)
explain how humans developed morals but the greater part of the animal kingdom did not. to them its survial of the fittest.
and you seem to admit that there are morals when you say, "morals [are] simply based off the condition we live," but personally refute that statement when you say "there are no such things as good morals...only opinions"--arent morals supposed to be about what is right and just?
You have an amazing tendency to repeat yourself. Didn't anyone
already said why?
That's why we have different conscience from the other living beings (in the Animal kingdom). Evolution. And experience.
No,
morals are another definition of what suits the majority better and then generalized to be the normal standard in those subjects. It has religious background perhaps, but not the full claim as you tried to imply.
QUOTE(Cfro)
?
the human brain performs functions vital for human life, and uses logic and reasoning to make decisions affection the life of an individual, correct?
experiences- things that happen which we remember and therefore in some what (big or small) affect us and how we live our lives?
(if i'm wrong in anyway correct me)
well if it was survival of the fittest (what it would be according to darwin) among humans, our morals would be different, not what they are today, right?
i'm confused at what you were saying-how those two things come together to make a valid point.
That's because you can only see things with that religious overlook. As animals that we are, we have emotions that contradict logic. Our brains' conscience tells us otherwise and through experience we take as granted what seems best. Wait... what a dejá vu feeling (look my reply paragraph above).

QUOTE(JohnzNoThere)
Why do you believe in Dinosaurs. The bones only tell time and what it looked like. Just like the Bible, and yet you believe dinasaurs existed. Why? Where's the proof?!?
C-14 dating perhaps? For sums, a scientifical method proved that it wasn't a fake or had incongruences. Alas for you, the same can't be told about the full extent of the Bible.
