Report, edit, etc...Posted by Parthx86 on 2005-07-07 at 18:01:38
QUOTE(Shatter @ Jul 6 2005, 11:04 PM)
Parthx, this is a bit late of a reply (to your questions about evolution) but I think you need to learn some science before we can intelligently debate. First thing, there ARE fossils of half evolved humans, ever hear of a species called homo erectus? And where on earth did you get the impression that all adult apes are the same, they arn't, but most of the mutations are insignificant, like toes that curl the wrong way, or a slightly enlarged brain. These arn't enough to lead to a new species, but they are still differences. Another reason why the adults of the same species arn't different is that if an animal is significantly different, then its classified as a new species. You should do your homework on this, as you are making consistantly incorrect assumptions about the fossil record, we DO have fossils of various half evolved organisms, as for why all of the apes didn't evolve, if only a certain number of apes have the beneficial mutations/breed with those having the beneficial mutations, then, suprise suprise, only a certain number of "apes" will have evolved. As for why we don't see creatures evolving today, we do, havn't you heard about how various strains of bacteria are evolving resistance to antibiotics, thus creating superbacteria immune to common cures? This is evolution at work, mutation combined with natural selection.
[right][snapback]255579[/snapback][/right]
[right][snapback]255579[/snapback][/right]
Alright all of that makes sense now, but I'd rather not study it. Why should I go worrying how my race started when I could be researching how to stop my race from dieing...or I could grow up into being a blizzard employee and work on my favorite game
Oh yeah, and you guys, this topic's about "un"dead not about 'tone'.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by MillenniumArmy on 2005-07-08 at 01:55:19
QUOTE(Deathknight @ Jul 6 2005, 08:33 PM)
Forums do not contain tones. Messages are text-only based.
[right][snapback]255207[/snapback][/right]
[right][snapback]255207[/snapback][/right]
The meaning of the messages contain tones. That's why there's such a thing as Flaming.
QUOTE(CheeZe @ Jul 6 2005, 08:46 PM)
Actually, text cannot contain tones because the definition of tones has to do with sound, which obviously, text cannot give off!
[right][snapback]255231[/snapback][/right]
[right][snapback]255231[/snapback][/right]
Usually it's the smileys that add to the text's tone.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Parthx86 on 2005-07-08 at 02:40:12
Why did this conversation turn to talking about tone in text? We're talking about undead (which have no tone 
)....Back on topic please guys
)....Back on topic please guysReport, edit, etc...Posted by D)s-202 on 2005-07-08 at 10:55:47
no silver dragon got most of his "mythical creatures" from three things
1)harry potter pheonixes and so on.
2)warcraft drakes and such
3)i told him i told him not a lot though..
1)harry potter pheonixes and so on.
2)warcraft drakes and such
3)i told him i told him not a lot though..
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Wilhelm on 2005-07-08 at 11:07:08
The replacing the dogs blood with oxygen was done like a blood transfusion, so actually, you're all wrong. They were alive while this was being done, while it did work. It's a chemical which mimics the actions of red blood cells, but works more efficently. You cannot revive what has already begun to rot. When your brain has not recieved oxygen for more then a few minutes, permanent damage is done. Once this gones on for long enough, the internal organs shut down, as the base of the brain, which runs unconscious functions begins to cease to work, as does your heart and lungs.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by MillenniumArmy on 2005-07-08 at 12:34:47
QUOTE(Silver-Dragon @ Jul 7 2005, 10:24 AM)
i know more mythical creatures then anyone in the staredit network, i bet.
[right][snapback]255770[/snapback][/right]
[right][snapback]255770[/snapback][/right]
Just about anything can be a mythical creature. Even this very piece of crumb lying right next to my keyboard as I am typing this can be a mythical creature.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Centreri on 2005-07-11 at 10:49:25
QUOTE
Either that, or you play Warcraft III too much.
I dont play warcraft too much, it only added about 10 creatures to my repertoire. And theres no lich in wc3
QUOTE
Just about anything can be a mythical creature. Even this very piece of crumb lying right next to my keyboard as I am typing this can be a mythical creature.
Well if it is, then its only to ure mind
to me thats a crumb,not a creature, and certaintly not mythicalQUOTE
no silver dragon got most of his "mythical creatures" from three things
1)harry potter pheonixes and so on.
2)warcraft drakes and such
3)i told him i told him not a lot though..
1)harry potter pheonixes and so on.
2)warcraft drakes and such
3)i told him i told him not a lot though..
No, i knew pheonixes from 6 different sources BEFORE i read harry potter...
Warcraft drakes? its just another word for male duck or 'teenage' dragon, and they are NOT only-warcraft, i knew those from 2 sources before warcraft...
and u told me nothing.Nothing that i care, care to tell,or remember anyway. and stop copying me....
back on topic pplReport, edit, etc...Posted by n2o-SiMpSoNs on 2005-07-11 at 12:13:41
QUOTE(Sonoco @ Jul 5 2005, 07:42 PM)
If you see something infront of you, It's probally a light glare, Or you are just tired or something, It can also be your mind playing tricks on you.
[right][snapback]254024[/snapback][/right]
[right][snapback]254024[/snapback][/right]
my mom and my aunt work a nursing home. One time they both saw a ghost of someone who had died the day before... So they were both seeing thingS?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Merrell on 2005-07-11 at 12:58:36
Yes, either they were drugged up or just imagining things.. Lots of people try to imagine seeing a ghost the day after someone died, its normal, but still, nothing is there. It's impossible. Mobster Monitor Rick.. now thats a hard one.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Staredit.Net Essence on 2005-07-12 at 11:44:52
QUOTE(MrrLL @ Jul 11 2005, 09:58 AM)
Yes, either they were drugged up or just imagining things.. Lots of people try to imagine seeing a ghost the day after someone died, its normal, but still, nothing is there. It's impossible. Mobster Monitor Rick.. now thats a hard one.
[right][snapback]260157[/snapback][/right]
[right][snapback]260157[/snapback][/right]
Skeptics like you who think they know everything, piss me off. You always have to come up with some "Logical" way of debunking us believers.
Do you know who Sylvia Brown is? Do you call her a fake?
If you call her a phony, you better take a look in the mirror.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Staredit.Net Essence on 2005-07-12 at 12:16:45
i beleave the it was corl. musterd in the dining room..oops wrong thing...lol
hey mrrll, if you dont beleave in the "supper natural" try playing a weegee bord<<<<<<<<<<<< someone tell me how to spell it plz!!!!!!) find a logical way to explain that shit why dont you. better yet, play it at the cemitary by yourself and explain the shit that goes on there. no, dont realy. i was just jokeing that that shit scares me to death. there is something out there, sometimes we cant see it, sometimes we can. and sometimes, people like you see it, and just brush it off like you did
hey mrrll, if you dont beleave in the "supper natural" try playing a weegee bord<<<<<<<<<<<< someone tell me how to spell it plz!!!!!!) find a logical way to explain that shit why dont you. better yet, play it at the cemitary by yourself and explain the shit that goes on there. no, dont realy. i was just jokeing that that shit scares me to death. there is something out there, sometimes we cant see it, sometimes we can. and sometimes, people like you see it, and just brush it off like you did
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Loser_Musician on 2005-07-12 at 12:24:26
QUOTE(kooshtwo @ Jul 12 2005, 11:16 AM)
i beleave the it was corl. musterd in the dining room..oops wrong thing...lol
hey mrrll, if you dont beleave in the "supper natural" try playing a weegee bord<<<<<<<<<<<< someone tell me how to spell it plz!!!!!!) find a logical way to explain that shit why dont you. better yet, play it at the cemitary by yourself and explain the shit that goes on there. no, dont realy. i was just jokeing that that shit scares me to death. there is something out there, sometimes we cant see it, sometimes we can. and sometimes, people like you see it, and just brush it off like you did
[right][snapback]260808[/snapback][/right]
hey mrrll, if you dont beleave in the "supper natural" try playing a weegee bord<<<<<<<<<<<< someone tell me how to spell it plz!!!!!!) find a logical way to explain that shit why dont you. better yet, play it at the cemitary by yourself and explain the shit that goes on there. no, dont realy. i was just jokeing that that shit scares me to death. there is something out there, sometimes we cant see it, sometimes we can. and sometimes, people like you see it, and just brush it off like you did
[right][snapback]260808[/snapback][/right]
Go watch the episode of penn and teller's bullshit on the supernatural. They got video interviewing clips of the people that make those kinds of things say it's just all about making a buck. And that's not even half of it.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Staredit.Net Essence on 2005-07-12 at 12:27:53
Debunkers are just cons. They dog on things that are facts, just to make some money.
Watch the History Channels Documentery on the Amnityville Horror.
There is a fat, stupid, bitch on there that talks crap on the people who lived in that house. Her husband was a major debunker of it. Yet he died of a heart attack with no prior medical history of heart attacks...
And his wife still believes it's all fake.... What a stupid, fat hoe bag.
Watch the History Channels Documentery on the Amnityville Horror.
There is a fat, stupid, bitch on there that talks crap on the people who lived in that house. Her husband was a major debunker of it. Yet he died of a heart attack with no prior medical history of heart attacks...
And his wife still believes it's all fake.... What a stupid, fat hoe bag.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Loser_Musician on 2005-07-12 at 12:29:45
I think the person that says that their product is magical is making more money than the person saying it isn't.
BTW - People did die of heart attacks all the time, and I'm more than positive a lot of them had no history of it. (Excluding family history of course, unless you indirectly said that) And how does that justify against all the facts they used against it?
Are you basically saying:
"Screw facts. They don't prove anything. Myths and coincidences do!"
BTW - People did die of heart attacks all the time, and I'm more than positive a lot of them had no history of it. (Excluding family history of course, unless you indirectly said that) And how does that justify against all the facts they used against it?
Are you basically saying:
"Screw facts. They don't prove anything. Myths and coincidences do!"
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Staredit.Net Essence on 2005-07-12 at 12:45:27
i have a question for all of you. have you ever played with one? thats what i thought. if you have ever sat down and plaed with one, youll never know what its like. sure the people that make then are saying its bull shit. yeh, they dont ever play with them. im telling you, sit down at someones house that has one and play it BY YOUR SELF. this way you have no excuse to say that they other person is moving it. youll think differently. like i said, there are some crazy ass stories that have to do with those. thats all im going to say. Kellimus, ask mike about them next time you see him, he'll tel you all about them
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Loser_Musician on 2005-07-12 at 12:47:36
QUOTE(kooshtwo @ Jul 12 2005, 11:45 AM)
i have a question for all of you. have you ever played with one? thats what i thought. if you have ever sat down and plaed with one, youll never know what its like. sure the people that make then are saying its bull shit. yeh, they dont ever play with them. im telling you, sit down at someones house that has one and play it BY YOUR SELF. this way you have no excuse to say that they other person is moving it. youll think differently. like i said, there are some crazy ass stories that have to do with those. thats all im going to say. Kellimus, ask mike about them next time you see him, he'll tel you all about them
[right][snapback]260820[/snapback][/right]
[right][snapback]260820[/snapback][/right]
Who here hasn't?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Staredit.Net Essence on 2005-07-12 at 12:48:46
you oviously. if you have played with one you would know that there is something else in the room with you moving that thing around the bord.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Staredit.Net Essence on 2005-07-12 at 12:57:31
I won't touch one of those boards because they are the link to the Devil!
And I don't need to have proof that ghosts exsist, cause I know they do.
What is the feeling you get when you're being watched? Why will your hair stand on end sometimes and you get shivers down your spine? Why will a cat stare at a wall, hiss, then run out of the room?
Seriously folks. Look at all the evidence.
And I don't need to have proof that ghosts exsist, cause I know they do.
What is the feeling you get when you're being watched? Why will your hair stand on end sometimes and you get shivers down your spine? Why will a cat stare at a wall, hiss, then run out of the room?
Seriously folks. Look at all the evidence.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Deathknight on 2005-07-12 at 12:59:10
Ok. I don't remember, but someone said something about a "child being captured in an old photo", and the people taking the picture said nobody was there.
PROOF THAT GHOSTS CAN NOT BE CAPTURED BY A CAMERA:
I'm pretty sure film captures light reflections. If the film only captures light bouncing off objects, then the "ghost" WAS seen by the people. If it was not seen by the people, it was not seen by the camera. It's impossible for the camera to capture a light reflection unless people could see it. If light can "reflect off a ghost to be captured", then "ghosts are made of matter that can be seen by the human eye". It's simple logic, there's no way light can "bounce off something invisible" and be captured with TEXTURES AND COLOURS. This is proof that the boy was not a ghost and WAS actually a boy in the picture(or just a photoshop done later on), his parents just making up some lie, maybe the boy died later and they didn't want to remember because everytime they did, it would hurt, so they just said the boy was never in that picture... or something like that, either that or someone used an image editing tool later on in the picture for the media. I don't know, but whatever the picture takers said was a lie and I proved it. No ghosts exist in pictures taken by film.
If you think "ghosts move fast" or whatever other bullshit, then think about simple things like: where's the motion blur?
PROOF THAT GHOSTS CAN NOT BE CAPTURED BY A CAMERA:
I'm pretty sure film captures light reflections. If the film only captures light bouncing off objects, then the "ghost" WAS seen by the people. If it was not seen by the people, it was not seen by the camera. It's impossible for the camera to capture a light reflection unless people could see it. If light can "reflect off a ghost to be captured", then "ghosts are made of matter that can be seen by the human eye". It's simple logic, there's no way light can "bounce off something invisible" and be captured with TEXTURES AND COLOURS. This is proof that the boy was not a ghost and WAS actually a boy in the picture(or just a photoshop done later on), his parents just making up some lie, maybe the boy died later and they didn't want to remember because everytime they did, it would hurt, so they just said the boy was never in that picture... or something like that, either that or someone used an image editing tool later on in the picture for the media. I don't know, but whatever the picture takers said was a lie and I proved it. No ghosts exist in pictures taken by film.
If you think "ghosts move fast" or whatever other bullshit, then think about simple things like: where's the motion blur?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Loser_Musician on 2005-07-12 at 12:59:25
Nice evidence there kell. I'm a serious believer now.
Extremely good point death. Extremely good.
Extremely good point death. Extremely good.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Staredit.Net Essence on 2005-07-12 at 13:02:00
QUOTE(Deathknight @ Jul 12 2005, 09:59 AM)
Ok. I don't remember, but someone said something about a "child being captured in an old photo", and the people taking the picture said nobody was there.
PROOF THAT GHOSTS CAN NOT BE CAPTURED BY A CAMERA:
I'm pretty sure film captures light reflections. If the film only captures light bouncing off objects, then the "ghost" WAS seen by the people. If it was not seen by the people, it was not seen by the camera. It's impossible for the camera to capture a light reflection unless people could see it. If light can "reflect off a ghost to be captured", then "ghosts are made of matter that can be seen by the human eye". It's simple logic, there's no way light can "bounce off something invisible" and be captured with TEXTURES AND COLOURS. This is proof that the boy was not a ghost and WAS actually a boy in the picture(or just a photoshop done later on), his parents just making up some lie, maybe the boy died later and they didn't want to remember because everytime they did, it would hurt, so they just said the boy was never in that picture... or something like that, either that or someone used an image editing tool later on in the picture for the media. I don't know, but whatever the picture takers said was a lie and I proved it. No ghosts exist in pictures taken by film.
If you think "ghosts move fast" or whatever other bullshit, then think about simple things like: where's the motion blur?
[right][snapback]260830[/snapback][/right]
PROOF THAT GHOSTS CAN NOT BE CAPTURED BY A CAMERA:
I'm pretty sure film captures light reflections. If the film only captures light bouncing off objects, then the "ghost" WAS seen by the people. If it was not seen by the people, it was not seen by the camera. It's impossible for the camera to capture a light reflection unless people could see it. If light can "reflect off a ghost to be captured", then "ghosts are made of matter that can be seen by the human eye". It's simple logic, there's no way light can "bounce off something invisible" and be captured with TEXTURES AND COLOURS. This is proof that the boy was not a ghost and WAS actually a boy in the picture(or just a photoshop done later on), his parents just making up some lie, maybe the boy died later and they didn't want to remember because everytime they did, it would hurt, so they just said the boy was never in that picture... or something like that, either that or someone used an image editing tool later on in the picture for the media. I don't know, but whatever the picture takers said was a lie and I proved it. No ghosts exist in pictures taken by film.
If you think "ghosts move fast" or whatever other bullshit, then think about simple things like: where's the motion blur?
[right][snapback]260830[/snapback][/right]
But if you think about it, no one said they didn't see the ghost.
Edit: I didn't finish reading the reply you posted.
Ghosts can be seen by the human eye, but only some have the ability to. Ever heard of ESP? That is real, everyone has it. Just some have it more.
Some ghosts are matter (ever heard of ectoplasm???) and some are just spirits.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Staredit.Net Essence on 2005-07-12 at 13:04:11
QUOTE(Deathknight @ Jul 12 2005, 10:59 AM)
Ok. I don't remember, but someone said something about a "child being captured in an old photo", and the people taking the picture said nobody was there.
PROOF THAT GHOSTS CAN NOT BE CAPTURED BY A CAMERA:
I'm pretty sure film captures light reflections. If the film only captures light bouncing off objects, then the "ghost" WAS seen by the people. If it was not seen by the people, it was not seen by the camera. It's impossible for the camera to capture a light reflection unless people could see it. If light can "reflect off a ghost to be captured", then "ghosts are made of matter that can be seen by the human eye". It's simple logic, there's no way light can "bounce off something invisible" and be captured with TEXTURES AND COLOURS. This is proof that the boy was not a ghost and WAS actually a boy in the picture(or just a photoshop done later on), his parents just making up some lie, maybe the boy died later and they didn't want to remember because everytime they did, it would hurt, so they just said the boy was never in that picture... or something like that, either that or someone used an image editing tool later on in the picture for the media. I don't know, but whatever the picture takers said was a lie and I proved it. No ghosts exist in pictures taken by film.
If you think "ghosts move fast" or whatever other bullshit, then think about simple things like: where's the motion blur?
[right][snapback]260830[/snapback][/right]
PROOF THAT GHOSTS CAN NOT BE CAPTURED BY A CAMERA:
I'm pretty sure film captures light reflections. If the film only captures light bouncing off objects, then the "ghost" WAS seen by the people. If it was not seen by the people, it was not seen by the camera. It's impossible for the camera to capture a light reflection unless people could see it. If light can "reflect off a ghost to be captured", then "ghosts are made of matter that can be seen by the human eye". It's simple logic, there's no way light can "bounce off something invisible" and be captured with TEXTURES AND COLOURS. This is proof that the boy was not a ghost and WAS actually a boy in the picture(or just a photoshop done later on), his parents just making up some lie, maybe the boy died later and they didn't want to remember because everytime they did, it would hurt, so they just said the boy was never in that picture... or something like that, either that or someone used an image editing tool later on in the picture for the media. I don't know, but whatever the picture takers said was a lie and I proved it. No ghosts exist in pictures taken by film.
If you think "ghosts move fast" or whatever other bullshit, then think about simple things like: where's the motion blur?
[right][snapback]260830[/snapback][/right]
that is entierly not true. i have a camera that, when i take a pic, it picks up lights that i can even see. i have a pic that the thing i was pinting at is blood red, becouse there was a fire works display about 2 hours before and the light was refracting off of my lense and it truned out red. take a photography class and youll know that cameras pic up just about anything
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Loser_Musician on 2005-07-12 at 13:04:31
QUOTE(Kellimus @ Jul 12 2005, 12:02 PM)
But if you think about it, no one said they didn't see the ghost.
[right][snapback]260834[/snapback][/right]
[right][snapback]260834[/snapback][/right]
If you think about it, that just proves some of the other incidents wrong. Showing that people have the magical ability to lie and make up shit to get fame and/or money.
Koosh, how does that derail death's stake into your side's heart then? heh?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by brutetal on 2005-07-12 at 13:04:56
If you don't or do belive in ghosts, I have somthing for you to do!
Okay get a camera and a tape recorder with a new unused recording tape.
Go to somewhere that you would see a ghost and just take pictures till you see one or just start recording for like a minute and then play it back to see if you get any sounds that your normal ears cant hear with out the tape recorder. Its quite weird....and odd and cool...
From that experiance if you did do it, I think you just might belive it.
Okay get a camera and a tape recorder with a new unused recording tape.
Go to somewhere that you would see a ghost and just take pictures till you see one or just start recording for like a minute and then play it back to see if you get any sounds that your normal ears cant hear with out the tape recorder. Its quite weird....and odd and cool...
From that experiance if you did do it, I think you just might belive it.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Deathknight on 2005-07-12 at 13:05:12
QUOTE
have you ever played with one? thats what i thought. if you have ever sat down and plaed with one, youll never know what its like. sure the people that make then are saying its bull shit. yeh, they dont ever play with them. im telling you, sit down at someones house that has one and play it BY YOUR SELF. this way you have no excuse to say that they other person is moving it. youll think differently.
Please tell me where I can get one of "these". I want the proof.