Staredit Network

Staredit Network -> Serious Discussion -> What type of Power should we turn to?

Report, edit, etc...Posted by Scotinator on 2005-09-01 at 19:07:33

I honestly think that the nucler energy is most needed In our planet thank you

Report, edit, etc...Posted by Vibrator on 2005-09-01 at 19:10:55

You will be thinking that untill a reactor blows up in your face (Really now it isn't very likely but if any country that used nuclear power went to war and got occupied there would be a world wide disaster)

Report, edit, etc...Posted by MapUnprotector on 2005-09-02 at 11:36:20

QUOTE

I don't think it should change his opinion if a nuclear reactor blew up in his face. It doesn't make the energy that it would have created any less needed.

Report, edit, etc...Posted by Staredit.Net Essence on 2005-09-02 at 11:50:14

I chose Solar. Because like it has been stated, Solar will not run out in our life time.

But I think we should try to use all of them as an aspect.

Or just finally get Cold Fusion to work >.<

Report, edit, etc...Posted by Scotinator on 2005-09-02 at 16:51:51

QUOTE(devilesk @ Sep 2 2005, 01:36 PM)

I don't think it should change his opinion if a nuclear reactor blew up in his face. It doesn't make the energy that it would have created any less needed.
[right][snapback]303690[/snapback][/right]

Hahahaha Thats true but I wouldnt live anymore HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Maybe my country needs it

But in second thought Id choose solar.

Report, edit, etc...Posted by Vibrator on 2005-09-02 at 20:55:23

Actually it would make it a lot less needed when we are in the middle of a nuclear winter.

Report, edit, etc...Posted by Oo.Insane.oO on 2005-09-02 at 21:38:13

I agree with the cold fusion but scientists will really need to get workin on it.

The only reason y i dont agree with solar energy is because each side of the world would only have about 12 hours 2 get the energy for the next 12 or so.

Report, edit, etc...Posted by Vibrator on 2005-09-02 at 22:08:57

Thats more then enough time. We can also put solar energy collecters into space (thats a bit far off though).

Report, edit, etc...Posted by Dr.Shotgun on 2005-09-02 at 23:34:18

There should be an "Unknown" option, sometone might invent something we haven't thought of yet.

Report, edit, etc...Posted by Syphon on 2005-09-04 at 18:18:05

QUOTE(Screwed @ Sep 1 2005, 05:40 AM)

Tidal. If we large areas of coastline with electricity generating turbos then the energy created will be quite a large amount (I guess). The tides are also always existent and stable. Although I don't really oppose any other method as well (except nuclear is they use long half-life elements like Cesium)
[right][snapback]302746[/snapback][/right]

They aren't always consistant though, sometimes they're a LOT higher

As for solar collectors in space, put them completely encircling the globe (with gaps in between of course) in geo-stationary orbit. Line up microwave dishes on the ground then BAM unlimited microwave power being beamed down 24-7.

But it would cost billions, if not trillions to get it to work.

Next Page (3)