Report, edit, etc...Posted by dumbducky on 2006-02-12 at 09:55:19
Topic seems to be dead. Can we have SEN weekly opinion poll X already?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by TheDaddy0420 on 2006-02-12 at 16:54:17
Yes please, it is already set in stone that our President doesn't need to be impeached and shouldn't be...
Lets get a new topic already.
Lets get a new topic already.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Arbitrary on 2006-02-12 at 17:46:45
QUOTE(TheDaddy0420 @ Feb 12 2006, 04:54 PM)
Yes please, it is already set in stone that our President doesn't need to be impeached and shouldn't be...
[right][snapback]425596[/snapback][/right]
[right][snapback]425596[/snapback][/right]
How is this?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by TheDaddy0420 on 2006-02-12 at 17:58:04
Read past posts....
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Voyager7456(MM) on 2006-02-13 at 10:27:01
QUOTE(TheDaddy0420 @ Feb 12 2006, 04:54 PM)
Yes please, it is already set in stone that our President doesn't need to be impeached and shouldn't be...
[right][snapback]425596[/snapback][/right]
[right][snapback]425596[/snapback][/right]
67% of the voters disagree.
It's more like the SEN Bi-Weekly Opinion Poll.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by TheDaddy0420 on 2006-02-13 at 17:31:52
Did all of them read these posts? Did all of them even post? Did they even look at the thread and just voted?
Answer is majority haven't even looked through this thread.
Answer is majority haven't even looked through this thread.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Voyager7456(MM) on 2006-02-13 at 18:25:37
You can't prove that. They may have just decided not to post. The only thing you can prove is that the majority of users that voted chose yes.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by TheDaddy0420 on 2006-02-13 at 21:43:14
Yes and all of the voting happened before the debate really got started.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by LtDonny on 2006-02-14 at 21:45:36
QUOTE(Zombie @ Feb 8 2006, 01:31 PM)
I dont think its right, Personlly i belive our converstations are private.
[right][snapback]422447[/snapback][/right]
[right][snapback]422447[/snapback][/right]
Yes, but if you have nothing to hide, why be afraid? If it means preventing another 9/11, so be it. I don't think they would go as far as you say "The president needs to be assassinated" they will immediately saunter over to your house and arrest you. They would just start listening more closely.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by TheDaddy0420 on 2006-02-15 at 01:22:46
QUOTE(LtDonny @ Feb 14 2006, 06:45 PM)
Yes, but if you have nothing to hide, why be afraid? If it means preventing another 9/11, so be it. I don't think they would go as far as you say "The president needs to be assassinated" they will immediately saunter over to your house and arrest you. They would just start listening more closely.
[right][snapback]427456[/snapback][/right]
[right][snapback]427456[/snapback][/right]
Exactly, and none of these people will ever get phone tapped. Hetto(Head-Dow/Slang) International calls.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Loser_Musician on 2006-02-17 at 16:16:39
The patriot act is bad due to the fact that the executive branch can just piss on the constitution, and no one's doing anything about it. That's what sickens me. You have to protect the constitution. No constitution=no rights.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Arbitrary on 2006-02-17 at 16:21:59
B..bu...but the terroristz0rz!!
(Note for the slow: This is sarcasm, directed against the mindless, frightened masses who have some irrational fear that a guy with an AK-47 and six pounds of C4 will selectively blow up their neighborhood.)
(Note for the slow: This is sarcasm, directed against the mindless, frightened masses who have some irrational fear that a guy with an AK-47 and six pounds of C4 will selectively blow up their neighborhood.)
Report, edit, etc...Posted by TheDaddy0420 on 2006-02-18 at 12:44:25
Note these above posts are exactly the people who thought 9/11 wouldn't happen/couldn't happen.