Is the United States really a free country? Facts point to: No.
Look at The Patriot Act. It basically takes your Bill Of Rights (The first 10 Amendments of the Constitution) and throws them out the door.
QUOTE(Wikipedia)
The First Amendment to the United States Constitution is a part of the United States Bill of Rights. Textually, it prevents the U.S. Congress from infringing on six rights. It forbids laws that:
* Establish a state religion or prefer certain religion (the "Establishment Clause");
* Prohibit the free exercise of religion (the "Free Exercise Clause");
* Infringe the freedom of speech;
* Infringe the freedom of the press;
* Limit the right to assemble peaceably;
* Limit the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
The First Amendment only explicitly disallows any of the rights from being abridged by Congress. Over time, however, the courts held that this extends to the executive and judicial branches. The Supreme Court has held that the Fourteenth Amendment extends the limitations of the First Amendment to actions by the states.
I bolded the ones that The Patriot Act breaks.
The "Limit the right to assemble peaceably" has been broken way before The Patriot Act. Ever heard of the RAVE Act? (Reduce Americans' Vunerability to Ecstacy Act) That banned Raves. Raves are a way to assemble peacefully. Anyways, more about The Patriot Act and how it infringes our rights.
QUOTE(Wikipedia)
Amendment IV (the Fourth Amendment) of the United States Constitution, which is part of the Bill of Rights, guards against unreasonable searches and seizures. It was a response to the controversial writs of assistance (a type of general search warrant) which were a significant factor behind the American Revolution.
The Patriot Act gives them the right to come into your home without a warrent, and search through anything and everything they want to. (Infringement of Amendment #4)
QUOTE(Wikipedia)
Amendment V (the Fifth Amendment) of the United States Constitution, which is part of the Bill of Rights, is related to legal procedure. Its guarantees stem from English common law. For instance, grand juries and the phrase "due process" both trace their origin to common law.
Hmm.. Read even more:
QUOTE(Wikipedia)
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
Anyone with logic (or common sense) would see that this amendment gives us the right to trial. The Patriot Act gives the government to throw you in prison without a trial. On assumptions, I should say. "He talks about terrorism! Throw him in prison, he is a terrorist!"
QUOTE(Wikipedia)
Amendment VI (the Sixth Amendment) of the United States Constitution codifies rights related to criminal prosecutions in federal courts. The Supreme Court has ruled that these rights are so fundamental and important that they are protected in state courts by the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause.
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.
The Patriot Act allows them to make trials looooooooooong. If I am not mistakened, Saddam's trial STILL is not over. Which breaks this amendment (Some may argue that he is not an American citizen so it doesn't apply to him, but isn't the constitution for EVERYONE that is IN america, regardless of ethnicity, background or race?) because it's not speedy.
QUOTE(Wikipedia)
Amendment IX (the Ninth Amendment) to the United States Constitution, which is part of the Bill of Rights, states:
"The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people."
This basically says proves The Patriot Act is illegal. It states that it is ILLEGAL to change laws made by the constitution, that will infringe the rights already deemed by the constitution. What does The Patriot Act do? Infringe rights.
QUOTE(Wikipedia)
Amendment X (the Tenth Amendment) of the United States Constitution, which is part of the Bill of Rights, was ratified on December 15, 1791. It states:
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
The Amendment, which makes explicit the idea that the federal government is limited only to the powers it is granted in the Constitution, is generally recognized to be a truism. In United States v. Sprague (1931) the Supreme Court noted that the amendment "added nothing to the [Constitution] as originally ratified". From time to time states and local governments have attempted to assert exemption from various federal regulations, especially in the areas of labor and environmental controls, using the Tenth Amendment as a basis for their claim.
Another oft-repeated quote, from United States v. Darby, 312 U.S. 100, 124 (1941), states:
The amendment states but a truism that all is retained which has not been surrendered. There is nothing in the history of its adoption to suggest that it was more than declaratory of the relationship between the national and state governments as it had been established by the Constitution before the amendment or that its purpose was other than to allay fears that the new national government might seek to exercise powers not granted, and that the states might not be able to exercise fully their reserved powers.
This basically says it's illegal for the Federal Level of government to change any laws made by the State Level, or the City Level. What laws or acts have they imposed to change this? No Child Left Behind
The State's had their own regulations for passing High School. And now, the government steps in and forces them to coperate or their funding get's cut? Total infringement.
I hope I have pointed out that we are no longer a free country. Don't skip over this. Actually read it, and quit being ignorant of the truth (Pointed towards Chris because he is blinded) and learn that your country has pulled the wool over your eyes for a loooooooong time.