QUOTE(DT_Battlekruser @ Mar 16 2006, 12:10 AM)
We are not officially at war; no official declaration of war has ever been issued. It is not within the presidential scope of power to declare essentially martial law upon American citizens to "fight a silent enemy".
And if you think he should have special powers because we are "at war with terrorists", when will this "war" end? When do we get our rights back?
[right][snapback]446698[/snapback][/right]
Terrorism? Isn't this a war on terror?
Wait.. Which one is it? I've heard both.
You can't fight a war on an emotion.
QUOTE(Arbitrary @ Mar 16 2006, 09:09 PM)
There's no reasoning with Chris on this matter

From what I've gathered, he either lacks an overall understanding of what is expressed Constitution, the Amendments in particular, or he's just being deliberately obtuse.
Yes, for a few days prior to your trial, not 4+ years.
[right][snapback]447257[/snapback][/right]
Excelently said.
QUOTE(TheDaddy0420 @ Mar 16 2006, 11:03 PM)
I have taken a step back and I want to know YOUR reasonings. I am asking simple questions on purpose.
C Rice is black and shes in a high ranking position in the government.
We vote for whos President based on the nominees nominated by the different parties running, Congross voted to go to war, Bush caused Kitrina.
[right][snapback]447350[/snapback][/right]
Hahahahahahahahahahhahahaaahahaha.
Congress didn't vote to go to war, because we are not at war. Bush isn't Nature.
QUOTE(TheDaddy0420 @ Mar 18 2006, 05:24 PM)
Well yeah, its kind of hard to debate people who don't listen and spin your quotes so to fit their arguement and don't read your posts carefully enough.
[right][snapback]448374[/snapback][/right]
I do hope you're talking about yourself. Because that's everything you do.