Report, edit, etc...Posted by 22-22 on 2006-11-28 at 15:09:22
He is one old the NFL most persistant kickers in the game. he also come through under pressure. Nate kaeding is a pretty good kicker also. There are lots of good kickers in the NFL he is the one that gets published more then all the rest.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by n2o-SiMpSoNs on 2006-11-28 at 16:33:05
QUOTE(Deathawk @ Nov 28 2006, 02:49 PM)
Best kicker in the NFL? Says who? LOL, I've said already he definately doesn't have the best leg in the NFL, there are stronger kickers and in my opinion generally more accurate kickers.
Uh, this was like the first team they beat that was over .500.. seriously, stop being a fanboy, nobody likes your ignorance and arrogance.
[right][snapback]596117[/snapback][/right]
Uh, this was like the first team they beat that was over .500.. seriously, stop being a fanboy, nobody likes your ignorance and arrogance.
[right][snapback]596117[/snapback][/right]
I don't think hes the best in the NFL. I think he is the best clutch kicker currently. I can't really say in the NFL like espn can because I don't know every kicker thats ever been in the NFL. I'm only 16 not 50 and I don't read about sports tonsss. Anyways, I thik kickers like Gould are better but, Adam still gets the job done even right now while he's on the colts. Vanderjerk used to be the most accurate kicker in the game but, he sucks under pressure and has no confidence. Which is why he just got dropped and being replaced by Gramatica.
Cincinnati is over 500 Minnesota is a good team that is just under 500. They have(had?) one of the best run stopping defenses. (The jets are over 500 and miami and buffalo are just under 500. We beat the bears who are number one against the pass. Tom Brady still did well against them. The interceptions that happened were because his recievers couldn't catch them (they were the recievers fault). The game shouldn't of even been that close but the refs made a few bullcrap calls. I was at that game. It was such a fun game because we were cheering stuff like you suck refs and freak you refs. haha
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Deathawk on 2006-11-28 at 16:36:35
I feel basically the same as you do about Vinateri, not Gould or Vanderjagt really.
I think that they might not have been over .500 when we played, I'm not sure what the stat was specifically talking about when I read it, .500 right now, or .500 when the Patriots played them.
Minnesota isn't really that good of a team.. ~.~ And Cininatti still has obvious holes on defense, big deal.
I think that they might not have been over .500 when we played, I'm not sure what the stat was specifically talking about when I read it, .500 right now, or .500 when the Patriots played them.
Minnesota isn't really that good of a team.. ~.~ And Cininatti still has obvious holes on defense, big deal.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by n2o-SiMpSoNs on 2006-11-28 at 16:39:57
QUOTE(Deathawk @ Nov 28 2006, 04:36 PM)
I feel basically the same as you do about Vinateri, not Gould or Vanderjagt really.
[right][snapback]596182[/snapback][/right]
[right][snapback]596182[/snapback][/right]
Gould has been money this year though. Except the pats blocked one in the game the other day haha!
Also, it's not like the Colts play teams that are over 500 every game. I will admit though the Patriots have had an easy schedule this year. The last few years though were more difficult.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Urmom(U) on 2006-11-28 at 16:41:01
Big deal? It's exactly what you asked for lmao.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Deathawk on 2006-11-28 at 16:44:11
I'm 100% sure the stat was true, it's just when it was true. I wasn't asking for a .500 team we beat, because before the Bears game it was true, we hadn't beaten an over .500 team(Whether it was on the week we verused them or @ the week of the Bears game, I don't know.)
I was specifically saying big deal about beating Cincinatti and Minnesota, they are not good teams really.
I was specifically saying big deal about beating Cincinatti and Minnesota, they are not good teams really.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Urmom(U) on 2006-11-28 at 17:37:00
Cincinatti is good, their record isn't what it should be since they have the hardest schedual in the league.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Mp)7-7 on 2006-11-28 at 17:53:07
If the Patriots had lost that game. They would have had their first season in a long time with 3 losses. They should win every game they have for the rest of the season. If not it would be quite the upset. I have no doubt they will make it to the playoffs.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Deathawk on 2006-11-28 at 19:37:02
Cincinatti has real problems on defense. Sure, their offense is good, but until they get a legitimate defense, they are just another mediocre team, in my opinion.
The Patriots are in the AFC East, it doesn't take much to make it to the playoffs.
The Patriots are in the AFC East, it doesn't take much to make it to the playoffs.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Mp)7-7 on 2006-11-28 at 19:55:38
Ya and the touchdown against them last game was the first offensive point scored against the Patriots in a long time from a team from the West.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by 22-22 on 2006-12-01 at 14:49:25
The patriots D# is like ranked 2nd behind the Bears in the NFL. The Patroits have a 13.1 and the Bears have a 12.5. WHo do you think has the better D#.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Deathawk on 2006-12-01 at 15:12:32
The one that's rated #1.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by KaboomHahahein on 2006-12-01 at 15:13:33
Moving this to Miscellaneous.
Moved
Moved
Report, edit, etc...Posted by n2o-SiMpSoNs on 2006-12-01 at 16:04:45
QUOTE(Deathawk @ Nov 28 2006, 07:37 PM)
Cincinatti has real problems on defense. Sure, their offense is good, but until they get a legitimate defense, they are just another mediocre team, in my opinion.
The Patriots are in the AFC East, it doesn't take much to make it to the playoffs.
[right][snapback]596368[/snapback][/right]
The Patriots are in the AFC East, it doesn't take much to make it to the playoffs.
[right][snapback]596368[/snapback][/right]
Let me guess it doesn't take much to win superbowls either?
QUOTE(KaboomHahahein @ Dec 1 2006, 03:13 PM)
Moving this to Miscellaneous.
Moved
[right][snapback]597825[/snapback][/right]
Moved
[right][snapback]597825[/snapback][/right]
Why would this be in miscellaneous. This should be in light. This is a discussion/debate...
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Deathawk on 2006-12-01 at 16:09:10
I did not say that, but to make it to the playoffs in the AFC East, it looks like this year all you have to do is be .500... the Jets, Bill, and Dolphins collectively suck this year.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by n2o-SiMpSoNs on 2006-12-03 at 14:27:48
QUOTE(Deathawk @ Dec 1 2006, 04:09 PM)
I did not say that, but to make it to the playoffs in the AFC East, it looks like this year all you have to do is be .500... the Jets, Bill, and Dolphins collectively suck this year.
[right][snapback]597864[/snapback][/right]
[right][snapback]597864[/snapback][/right]
The patriots would make it even if you had to be over .600. It's kind of like the NFC west.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Deathawk on 2006-12-03 at 14:58:57
.600 isn't that great, and yes, I agree, but that might be because their schedule and division is weak.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by 22-22 on 2006-12-04 at 14:46:23
The Patriots almost lost to the Lions. That is pretty bad. But the Colts lost to the Titins that is even worst. The Colts should have creamed the Patriots should have done the same. I think that the Patriots and the Colts will play for the AFC and in the NFC it will be the Bears and the Cowboys.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by n2o-SiMpSoNs on 2006-12-05 at 17:08:00
QUOTE(22-22 @ Dec 4 2006, 02:46 PM)
The Patriots almost lost to the Lions. That is pretty bad. But the Colts lost to the Titins that is even worst. The Colts should have creamed the Patriots should have done the same. I think that the Patriots and the Colts will play for the AFC and in the NFC it will be the Bears and the Cowboys.
[right][snapback]599230[/snapback][/right]
[right][snapback]599230[/snapback][/right]
The Patriots have so many key injuries it's not even funny. http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/teams/nwe/injuries
compared to the colt's injured list...
http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/teams/ind/injuries