Kerry.
Bush is a disgrace to not only Texas, but the whole USA.
He starts costly wars against people who don't need to be fought against. He supports his war and his positions with lies. He shouldn't be president in the first place (He lost the election in Florida. That election was rigged). He does not tackle any environmental issues at all. He glorifies things that shouldn't be glorified.
But when you break it all down, I don't support bush because he is a liar. A president should not lie. period.
QUOTE(FireKame @ Aug 20 2004, 04:03 PM)
I heard kerry is unpredictable in his decisions. I haven't decided if thats a good thing or a bad thing, but I wish another party would rise beyond democrats and republicans. maybe a socialist party...
I voted null
[right][snapback]55433[/snapback][/right]
People always point out Kerry supporting the war and then not supporting it. Well, a lot of people supported the war that bush made it out to be - a war where we were taking away weapons of mass destruction from evil terrorists. That war was a lie, and Kerry doesn't support that lie. Lot's of people changed their view on the war after they saw what Bush really intended to do.
QUOTE(nyczdigga @ Aug 24 2004, 07:04 PM)
Ill just go for Nader, for default. Third-party GO GO GO!
Please tell me, what country? If it is Iraq, dude your wrong. Iraqi's are good, some are bad, some support americans, some don't, just like iraqi rebels beheading contractors for politicial causes. Muttada Al-Sadr is a political rebelious man that wants the country for him and his people, the people that terror Iraq as a country. He has so much power on his people, that a group kidnapping a New York man threating to behead him if American troops don't fall back out of Iraq. Muttada told the group to let him go because his doing Iraq history, the group kidnapped him and his translator in a market, the group kidnapped him because they thought he was spying and snapping pictures for the americans.
I still want to know what country.
[right][snapback]58163[/snapback][/right]
Please don't vote for 3rd party. I prefer 3rd party views too, but I don't want that to be the cause of Bush's reelection...
again.
QUOTE(Templaren @ Aug 24 2004, 01:08 AM)
bush vote i on
[right][snapback]57819[/snapback][/right]
Care to explain why?
QUOTE(DT_Battlekruser @ Sep 5 2004, 11:38 AM)
And bush is from texas

[right][snapback]65990[/snapback][/right]
Hey, not all people from Texas are idiots

.
QUOTE(LegacyWeapon @ Sep 4 2004, 04:36 PM)
Actually, any sane person would reason that both of them are unfit for presidency.
Most people dont know what kerry is doing.
90% of the people voting for Kerry is because they vote for the person thats not Bush.
They are both being idiots. I wish they would have a duel and kill each other.
[right][snapback]65221[/snapback][/right]
I partially agree with this, except I think 'idiot' is a bit too strong of a word to describe Kerry. I don't like Kerry too much, but he is better than Bush.
QUOTE(NerdyTerdy @ Sep 4 2004, 04:33 PM)
The reason Clinton didn't get into wars was he closed his eyes to the world but I'm not gonna argue cuz I'll sound like a :censored:ing idiot lol. (maybe cuz i am).
[right][snapback]65217[/snapback][/right]
Clinton could not have been more interested in foreign affairs... He just solved foreign problems in peaceful ways, unlike Bush.
--------
My conclusion to this post is:
</Bush>
b.d