Report, edit, etc...Posted by titus on 2005-12-30 at 17:48:04
QUOTE(Arbitrary @ Dec 30 2005, 02:18 PM)
This is beyond retarded.
The AIDS virus was not "created" by the CIA. No human agency has ever engineered a virus with the sole intent of the destruction of a particular group. Harnessed one, yes, but surely not created.
Bush was the head of the CIA for a brief period in the 70's. In 1981 he was recovering from his failed Presidential bid.
The Pentagon/WTC theory can and will be debated until the destruction of the Earth, so there's no use wasting brain cells on that.
[right][snapback]394301[/snapback][/right]
The AIDS virus was not "created" by the CIA. No human agency has ever engineered a virus with the sole intent of the destruction of a particular group. Harnessed one, yes, but surely not created.
Bush was the head of the CIA for a brief period in the 70's. In 1981 he was recovering from his failed Presidential bid.
The Pentagon/WTC theory can and will be debated until the destruction of the Earth, so there's no use wasting brain cells on that.
[right][snapback]394301[/snapback][/right]
thanks for being another voice of reason bud
it seems all members of this board are anarchist conspiracy theorists...
i believe the link i provided above settles the pentagon 'plane/not plane' theory quite nicely.
i also wasn't aware there was controversy about the WTC - what are they claiming? that george bush piloted a missle into the top floor and disguised it as a plane?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by TheDaddy0420 on 2005-12-30 at 20:00:44
The theory is:
The Administration rigged the WTC buildings with explosives and sent those planes into the buildings to make it look like it was terrorists. The government would then set the explosives off and demolish the WTC buildings.
"zomg if you slowz down de video you canz see ze explosives goinz off"
right but I have already debated to and won about the WTC buildings weren't demo-ed.
The Administration rigged the WTC buildings with explosives and sent those planes into the buildings to make it look like it was terrorists. The government would then set the explosives off and demolish the WTC buildings.
"zomg if you slowz down de video you canz see ze explosives goinz off"
right but I have already debated to and won about the WTC buildings weren't demo-ed.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Sicarul on 2005-12-30 at 20:34:19
No way... the 9/11 attack was real...
Still, Osama participated in CIA, wich makes this suspicious, but what i'm really sure of is that USA Government doesn't want Terrorists to vanish, what would they use as an excuse for being the uber world police? they wouldn't have a threat to trick citizens...
The only conspirancy that exists is the one of money, they all search ways of getting money, don't you think weapons/tanks/etc industries pay enough to convince government guys that they need war?
Bush is just the one that's now, USA is the one that goes "uber policeman" of the world...
i wonder when will it finish... and if another country will take it's place when it does...
And... AIDS just came in handy for christians that hate homosexuals... but it wasn't made by CIA... and how can you hate if you are christian? wasn't it about love and all that suff? duh... i got it wrong then... i tought it was all about love, comprehension...
Still, Osama participated in CIA, wich makes this suspicious, but what i'm really sure of is that USA Government doesn't want Terrorists to vanish, what would they use as an excuse for being the uber world police? they wouldn't have a threat to trick citizens...
The only conspirancy that exists is the one of money, they all search ways of getting money, don't you think weapons/tanks/etc industries pay enough to convince government guys that they need war?
Bush is just the one that's now, USA is the one that goes "uber policeman" of the world...
i wonder when will it finish... and if another country will take it's place when it does...
And... AIDS just came in handy for christians that hate homosexuals... but it wasn't made by CIA... and how can you hate if you are christian? wasn't it about love and all that suff? duh... i got it wrong then... i tought it was all about love, comprehension...
Report, edit, etc...Posted by TheDaddy0420 on 2005-12-30 at 21:31:48
Sicarul did you not look at the website on the previous page? Scientific evidence that shows the pentagon attack was real and not a missile or what ever.
Sicarul, you shouldn't assume anything about the US. You thought slavery was still around...
And its not just Christians who hate homosexuals. They have just gotton the most attention becuase Christians (at least Catholics) won't marry homosexuals.
I'm fine with homosexuals, I could care less. But do not criminalize some one who does not approve of them.
Sicarul, you shouldn't assume anything about the US. You thought slavery was still around...
And its not just Christians who hate homosexuals. They have just gotton the most attention becuase Christians (at least Catholics) won't marry homosexuals.
I'm fine with homosexuals, I could care less. But do not criminalize some one who does not approve of them.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Pyro_Maniak14 on 2005-12-31 at 00:36:35
QUOTE(S.T.A.R.S-Chris @ Dec 30 2005, 08:00 PM)
The theory is:
The Administration rigged the WTC buildings with explosives and sent those planes into the buildings to make it look like it was terrorists. The government would then set the explosives off and demolish the WTC buildings.
"zomg if you slowz down de video you canz see ze explosives goinz off"
right but I have already debated to and won about the WTC buildings weren't demo-ed.
[right][snapback]394474[/snapback][/right]
The Administration rigged the WTC buildings with explosives and sent those planes into the buildings to make it look like it was terrorists. The government would then set the explosives off and demolish the WTC buildings.
"zomg if you slowz down de video you canz see ze explosives goinz off"
right but I have already debated to and won about the WTC buildings weren't demo-ed.
[right][snapback]394474[/snapback][/right]
[FONT=Optima]Hmmm.... Interesting? I showed my friend this... this was his response:
"I hope you die you communist
and you can go to Hell. Pro-Bush!"Personally... my friend is a Pro-Bush person so he reacts harshly when you mock the US... Back to the "they-rigged-the-WTC-with-explosives" part... Why the
would the most powerful country in the world... destroy and obliterate thousands of people just to MAKE an excuse to go to war with Afghanastan?? Show me a site to the video and I might believe you.[/FONT]Report, edit, etc...Posted by TheDaddy0420 on 2005-12-31 at 00:46:13
Pyro, I said I already debated that they WERE NOT demolished with explosives (demo-ed).
Meaning I supported the true action that the terrorists were the ones who crashed into the WTC towers and killed all those people, NOT Bush.
Meaning I supported the true action that the terrorists were the ones who crashed into the WTC towers and killed all those people, NOT Bush.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Pyro_Maniak14 on 2005-12-31 at 01:05:15
This is my friend's response to everyones critism on Bush:
You dont know anything ok, why dont you move out of the country, oh yeah, you cant so shut the up, you think you can't do a better job as president. When you move out of your mom's house, you stupid anti-Bush , then we can talk. Stop talking about your country's leader, he's trying his best, why aren't you trying to get la*d instead of talking !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!...........................................................................................................
You
dont know anything ok, why dont you move out of the country, oh yeah, you cant so shut the up, you think you can't do a better job as president. When you move out of your mom's house, you stupid anti-Bush , then we can talk. Stop talking about your country's leader, he's trying his best, why aren't you trying to get la*d instead of talking !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!........................................................................................................... Report, edit, etc...Posted by Staredit.Net Essence on 2005-12-31 at 01:22:48
Wow. Your friend acts just like Chris used to.
For your informatio, friend of Pyro, I am moved out of home. I'm in college, and I support myself.
So please tell your friend, that when he can speak like a normal homosapien, we shall discuss this.
And btw, you're friend is not very intelligent. His reply is full of logical fallacies.
For your informatio, friend of Pyro, I am moved out of home. I'm in college, and I support myself.
So please tell your friend, that when he can speak like a normal homosapien, we shall discuss this.
And btw, you're friend is not very intelligent. His reply is full of logical fallacies.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Pyro_Maniak14 on 2005-12-31 at 01:25:43
His response: you
Im very sorry... he's very sensitive when he comes to Bush... I dont know why and he won't tell me...
you Im very sorry... he's very sensitive when he comes to Bush... I dont know why and he won't tell me...
Report, edit, etc...Posted by titus on 2005-12-31 at 02:44:31
QUOTE(Kellimus @ Dec 30 2005, 10:22 PM)
Wow. Your friend acts just like Chris used to.
For your informatio, friend of Pyro, I am moved out of home. I'm in college, and I support myself.
So please tell your friend, that when he can speak like a normal homosapien, we shall discuss this.
And btw, you're friend is not very intelligent. His reply is full of logical fallacies.
[right][snapback]394666[/snapback][/right]
For your informatio, friend of Pyro, I am moved out of home. I'm in college, and I support myself.
So please tell your friend, that when he can speak like a normal homosapien, we shall discuss this.
And btw, you're friend is not very intelligent. His reply is full of logical fallacies.
[right][snapback]394666[/snapback][/right]
haha
name two fallacies in his friend's reply
also: you're not very intelligent (you used the wrong form of 'your' there, buddy)
Report, edit, etc...Posted by TheDaddy0420 on 2005-12-31 at 02:56:09
That dude seems very troubled, he shouldn't be that sensitive.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Staredit.Net Essence on 2005-12-31 at 03:17:34
QUOTE(titus @ Dec 31 2005, 12:44 AM)
haha
name two fallacies in his friend's reply
also: you're not very intelligent (you used the wrong form of 'your' there, buddy)
[right][snapback]394725[/snapback][/right]
name two fallacies in his friend's reply
also: you're not very intelligent (you used the wrong form of 'your' there, buddy)
[right][snapback]394725[/snapback][/right]
Gladly:
QUOTE
You censored.gif dont know anything ok
There's #1
Hastey assumption. Logical fallacy.
QUOTE
why dont you move out of the country, oh yeah, you cant so shut the censored.gif up
There's #2
Again, another Hasty assumption.
And wow. I screwed up and had one grammatical error, and you try to degrade me. Some logic that is.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by titus on 2005-12-31 at 18:06:08
QUOTE(Kellimus @ Dec 31 2005, 12:17 AM)
Gladly:
There's #1
Hastey assumption. Logical fallacy.
There's #2
Again, another Hasty assumption.
And wow. I screwed up and had one grammatical error, and you try to degrade me. Some logic that is.
[right][snapback]394752[/snapback][/right]
There's #1
Hastey assumption. Logical fallacy.
There's #2
Again, another Hasty assumption.
And wow. I screwed up and had one grammatical error, and you try to degrade me. Some logic that is.
[right][snapback]394752[/snapback][/right]
bud, 'hasty assumption' doesn't turn up in any of my fallacy searches (as to what it is). if i'm just missing it, could you tell me what it is?
secondly, you're also commiting argumentum ad logicam
thirdly, you make numerous spelling and grammatical errors, leading me to believe that your utter presumptuousness and arrogance is fairly baseless.
ADDITION:
hey, i think i found it
QUOTE
Converse accident / Hasty generalization
This fallacy is the reverse of the Fallacy of Accident. It occurs when you form a general rule by examining only a few specific cases which aren't representative of all possible cases. For example:
"Jim Bakker was an insincere Christian. Therefore all Christians are insincere."
This fallacy is the reverse of the Fallacy of Accident. It occurs when you form a general rule by examining only a few specific cases which aren't representative of all possible cases. For example:
"Jim Bakker was an insincere Christian. Therefore all Christians are insincere."
wait a minute
that doesn't seem like what he's doing at all
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Pyro_Maniak14 on 2006-01-01 at 00:57:52
... titus... sigh... nevermind... But anyway... titus is right a little bit... he didn't really have fallacies in there but he didn't say why Bush was a good president... For all you people who are Pro-Bush... why? What has he done to make you defend him? Just curious... because there isn't much you can say to defend him...
PS titus... stop flaming the post... WHO cares if people have grammar errors...
PS titus... stop flaming the post... WHO cares if people have grammar errors...
Report, edit, etc...Posted by titus on 2006-01-01 at 03:50:28
QUOTE(Pyro_Maniak14 @ Dec 31 2005, 09:57 PM)
... titus... sigh... nevermind... But anyway... titus is right a little bit... he didn't really have fallacies in there but he didn't say why Bush was a good president... For all you people who are Pro-Bush... why? What has he done to make you defend him? Just curious... because there isn't much you can say to defend him...
PS titus... stop flaming the post... WHO cares if people have grammar errors...
[right][snapback]395429[/snapback][/right]
PS titus... stop flaming the post... WHO cares if people have grammar errors...
[right][snapback]395429[/snapback][/right]
i was simply highlighting the irony in his post - "you're [sic] friend is unintelligent!"
sounds like flaming to me
why do i defend bush?
why not? you're shifting the burden of proof. i'm not full-on supporting him as a man - i disagree with his "big gov't" policies and his bringing of religion into politics, but overall he hasn't been that bad
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Staredit.Net Essence on 2006-01-02 at 04:01:25
How is he shifting the burdon of proof, when you have not suplied it?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by titus on 2006-01-02 at 14:58:32
QUOTE(Kellimus @ Jan 2 2006, 01:01 AM)
How is he shifting the burdon of proof, when you have not suplied it?
[right][snapback]396334[/snapback][/right]
[right][snapback]396334[/snapback][/right]
'why are you against bush, we have highest standard of living/most powerful economy/etc etc'
'WHAT HAS BUSH DONE TO MAKE YOU SUPPORT HIM, HUH???'
Report, edit, etc...Posted by UN-Rommel on 2006-01-02 at 15:08:21
QUOTE(S.T.A.R.S-Chris @ Dec 28 2005, 10:18 PM)
Kellimoose, I really don't care anymore, the Patriot is and does protect us. Our intelligence is doing an exellent job for being so crappy/worthless.
Bush is not an idiot, he is not a great man either. He is just a President who feels he is doing the right thing, which he is in fact is not doing a very good job.
Oh and I have already proved Atreyu) that it was clearly not Bush's fault for the aftermath of Kitrina, thank the corrupt local officials for that mess.
Iraq = pointless war, I frankly don't give a shiz anymore about Iraqis, they are probably going to fark up and go Allah on us and bs.
[right][snapback]392271[/snapback][/right]
Bush is not an idiot, he is not a great man either. He is just a President who feels he is doing the right thing, which he is in fact is not doing a very good job.
Oh and I have already proved Atreyu) that it was clearly not Bush's fault for the aftermath of Kitrina, thank the corrupt local officials for that mess.
Iraq = pointless war, I frankly don't give a shiz anymore about Iraqis, they are probably going to fark up and go Allah on us and bs.
[right][snapback]392271[/snapback][/right]
LMFAO that is all false. He is an idiot, he failed college and his daddy had to give him a job at mining oil. It was his fault on katrina cause he had no evac process to stop it. We saw the difference from katrina to texas's hurricane. He is tapping in our shiz trying to perform his retarded national security to "protect" us. He will get kicked out of office before the end of this.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by TheDaddy0420 on 2006-01-02 at 15:12:21
Mp)Marine you wouldn't be saying anything about Bush if the media and other people didn't criminalize him on everything that happens in the US.
If nobody said anything about Katrina, you wouldn't say how bad Bush did with Katrina, plain and simple. This goes for many other people too.
If nobody said anything about Katrina, you wouldn't say how bad Bush did with Katrina, plain and simple. This goes for many other people too.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Arbitrary on 2006-01-02 at 16:46:18
I would. There's this thing called the First Amendment, it comes in handy sometimes.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by titus on 2006-01-02 at 17:43:17
QUOTE(Arbitrary @ Jan 2 2006, 01:46 PM)
I would. There's this thing called the First Amendment, it comes in handy sometimes.
[right][snapback]396608[/snapback][/right]
[right][snapback]396608[/snapback][/right]
first amendment doedsn't cover hate speech
oh and mp), please provide some backing for any of your statements ("LMOA ALL FALSE LAWL LAWL LAWL")
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Deathawk on 2006-01-02 at 18:33:54
That goes for everybody who doesn't pay attention to what George Bush does... Unfortunate for GWB, a lot of people do.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by ShadowBrood on 2006-01-02 at 19:38:44
George Bush is an idiot. No justification needed. These threads are getting as popular as the "Is God Real?" threads...
Report, edit, etc...Posted by titus on 2006-01-02 at 20:23:53
QUOTE(ShadowBrood @ Jan 2 2006, 04:38 PM)
George Bush is an idiot. No justification needed. These threads are getting as popular as the "Is God Real?" threads...
[right][snapback]396724[/snapback][/right]
[right][snapback]396724[/snapback][/right]
you're an idiot
no justification needed
ohwait
Report, edit, etc...Posted by UN-Rommel on 2006-01-02 at 21:10:46
QUOTE(titus @ Jan 2 2006, 03:43 PM)
first amendment doedsn't cover hate speech
oh and mp), please provide some backing for any of your statements ("LMOA ALL FALSE LAWL LAWL LAWL")
[right][snapback]396639[/snapback][/right]
oh and mp), please provide some backing for any of your statements ("LMOA ALL FALSE LAWL LAWL LAWL")
[right][snapback]396639[/snapback][/right]
I did, i told him what he had false info on and yes bush is supposed to have been aware of katrina b4 it happened. Either its his fault for being a dumb man and not helping due to it was texans or it was the people who were supposed to inform him. Either way, the republicans were at fault for these serious issues these days.