The age system is fine. If we tested every individual with some sort of a "maturity" test it would cost unnecessary amounts of money and it wouldn't be very accurate. You can't just measure someone's maturity, they can easily claim to be responsible just to get some beer. Also you can't just ban all alcohol in the world, because there are responsible people.
Would you rather
1. Kill every single animal in the world with no discretion?
2. Commence expensive/extensive scientific tests on every individual specimen to see if it is capable of killing or not?
or
3. Kill specimens that have a history of killing people?
QUOTE
You can also die at 1, or 0. You dont need a license on dieing. Drinking is just a good way to start a lot of problems that could mess up your future. If everyone is how you say they are Centreri. You can drink and stay responsible, then why are their drunks that drive home and kill people then beat their family? Why are there rehabs and why are people homeless because they wasted all their money on booze and trying to keep the buzz that they get addicted. I wish I was that responsible.
He said that you
can drink responsibly.
QUOTE
To be honest, you can't necessarilly debate about something that you haven't done and experienced. Saying something is bad based on statistics and such cannot justify your point to the fullest.
There is nothing wrong with drinking, and it is not a true drug.
In effect, there's nothing wrong with any drug or drink. It's the person that makes it bad.
Having "a cold one" every now and then is just fine.
Statistically deaths by drinking are VERY minimal. In fact, the main cause of death is not by drinking but by the action taken after intoxication. Sure... you might say that drinking is the cause of it... but it once again goes to the person not the substance.
Nuclear weapons aren't so bad either, until you launch them of course. Even then it is technically your fault. Also they hardly "kill" anyone, it's the radiation that actually does the killing. Don't kick it until you try it.
QUOTE
Does that mean we should promote safety helmets to protect our braincells?
Yea that's ridiculous, I've never heard of anything of the sort.
QUOTE
I used to argue this, that alcohol was a drug, that it was a depressant. Until even my chemistry teachers separated drugs and alcohol. "Don't do drugs or alcohol." Why do they say them separately? It's because they are different in many ways and on terms of addictiveness and total cost of their negative effects.
"The purpose of drinking alcohol is for its intoxicating effect (even if you have no intention of drinking to excess). Virtually no one drinks it as food. So I consider alcohol a drug. But the use of hobby glue is for adhesive applications. Relatively few people use it as a drug. So I call hobby glue an adhesive. Did you know that glue has calories? With your argument, you’d be stuck calling glue a food!" -Marilyn vos Savant
QUOTE
I've seen many stories where drunk people survive accidents where if they were unintoxicated, they would surely die.
Likewise I've seen many stories where people had played Russian roulette and were it not for their past experiences playing the game, they surely would have died.
QUOTE
I don't deny it's a drug, I just classify it aside from a true drug. Cause in heart, it isn't a true drug, but in a class of it's own. You can't compare alcohol with Coke or Meph.
"This is your own personal bias, there's no evidence to back it."
QUOTE
It's okay to have bias, my underlying point was that it's not okay to let it completely overtake reality and defy logical reasoning. And as a note, can you please use more understandable grammar?
"It's only ok to be biased when I'm the one being biased. If you're biased I'll use this biased opinion to point out the logical fallacies of being biased when you are not me."
Way to stack vicious circle upon vicious circle.