Yeah... dictatorship is *THE* way to go!... NOT!

Good question. I'm unsure about Kerry, and Bush is just odd. I'm glad Bush won the last election because Al Gore whould have been even worse. I don't know.
QUOTE(Mongoose @ Sep 19 2004, 03:27 PM)
I'm glad Bush won the last election because Al Gore whould have been even worse.
[right][snapback]75815[/snapback][/right]
OK, just what in the world would make you think that Gore would have been worse than Bush?! Gore was the better candidate; he DESERVED to win, but Bush cheated him out of what was rightfully his!
Gore DID win, the Rebupilican refused the recount.
GOGO KEEP THREAD ALIVE [/rant]
I want Kerry. Bush sucks, I don't think any Bush supporters would like some of my thoughts though,

But, yeah, I want Kerry, I don't think our nation could handle Bush again.
Well.. I Dont Think.. you know what you are talking about.
When you have to make a choice between Bush and Kerry, it's basically like having to choose between the lesser of two evils.
My advice is 'Don't Vote!' (And you probably can't anyway.)
If you want an unbiased view of the promises that Bush, Kerry and Nader are making, then look here (it really is very good in my opinion and helps clear up uncertainty:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/in_depth/americ...ide/default.stmNot voting is the worst thing you could do. Your lucky to even live in a country where you get to elect your leader, and you should take advantage of that freedom.
If you can't even vote, then don't worry about it.
Kerry and Bush are the same, they just dispense different flavors of crap. Personally, I wish they'd both lose.
lol. the media has won. they have gotten the public so biased against Bush it's pathetic, maybe someday, the next generation will teach their kids to THINK and not be THOUGHT FOR.
The media are there to take the moral high ground, Swap.
No, actually, they bend the story so that Bush looks bad to fufill their own agenda. Do this: Open your eyes, look at the news over a week then come back here and tell me that Bush gets ranted on ALOT more than Kerry.
And noo.... they can never report what good things that Bush does, only the negative.
I'm not American and don't watch American news.
However, the 'rest of the West' media absolutely hate Bush.
Exactly, it all has to do with money...somehow someone is getting more money by having Kerry as the president then Bush,
Maybe Kerrys TAX RAISES, yeah no one talks about that, more money out of your pocket.. good job.. vote for kerry
I actually want Nader to win....
I personally dont like Bush nor Kerry
QUOTE(@:@ @ Sep 20 2004, 04:34 PM)
Exactly, it all has to do with money...somehow someone is getting more money by having Kerry as the president then Bush,
Maybe Kerrys TAX RAISES, yeah no one talks about that, more money out of your pocket.. good job.. vote for kerry
[right][snapback]76356[/snapback][/right]
First of all a tax raise is exactly what we need to lessen Bush's debt. You can't cut taxes forever to generate short-term bursts of economical improvement, like Bush has done. Second of all, since you're such an expert economist, why don't you tell us where we're going to be in ten years if Bush racks up more debts?
What's with the conspiracy theories about the media, Swap? You sound paranoid and scared. Is it because your emotions have been manipulated that you think that all liberals are bad no matter what and that George Bush is good because of his... uh... good policies? I would love an example of a good policy by the way. Maybe something that doesn't have to do with security. Good luck, you'll need it.
QUOTE(@:@ @ Sep 20 2004, 03:34 PM)
Exactly, it all has to do with money...somehow someone is getting more money by having Kerry as the president then Bush,
Maybe Kerrys TAX RAISES, yeah no one talks about that, more money out of your pocket.. good job.. vote for kerry
[right][snapback]76356[/snapback][/right]
you must be one of those rich people who actually got more money

(I am still waiting for that one source about UN saying Iraq was dangerous or something

)
QUOTE
And noo.... they can never report what good things that Bush does, only the negative.
list away!~

i dont like bush thats why im going for kerry.
QUOTE
And noo.... they can never report what good things that Bush does, only the negative.
Name
one good thing Bush did for us.
QUOTE(exo6yte @ Sep 20 2004, 12:13 PM)
Kerry and Bush are the same, they just dispense different flavors of crap. Personally, I wish they'd both lose.
[right][snapback]76305[/snapback][/right]
Well, Kerry's flavour of crap is much, MUCH more palatable than Bush's flavour of crap.
QUOTE(DT_Battlekruser @ Sep 20 2004, 05:38 PM)
Name one good thing Bush did for us.
[right][snapback]76447[/snapback][/right]
Well, Bush did capture Sadaam, but that's basically it
I wish both of them would duel and kill each other...
QUOTE(MillenniumArmy @ Sep 22 2004, 04:01 PM)
Well, Bush did capture Sadaam, but that's basically it
[right][snapback]77327[/snapback][/right]
the price of "capturing" (more like surrendering) was too great and I think it's better off if we had left them alone until the World agrees to do something about it.
QUOTE
Well, Bush did capture Sadaam, but that's basically it
We spent $100 billion+ and 1000+ lives to do it. Definently not worth it, so I don't think that is good for America.
I agree with MilleniumArmy, I actually want Nader to win because Kerry and Bush both have their share of creepiness.