Staredit Network

Staredit Network -> Portal News -> No more EUDenabler
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Tuxedo Templar on 2005-08-16 at 18:38:39
Personally, I'd rather have seen SC mapping burn out in a blaze of EUD glory (even with the risks) than fade away. I'd like to trust that someone would make a SC2 or something, but...
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Voyager7456(MM) on 2005-08-16 at 18:39:15
QUOTE(Tuxedo Templar @ Aug 16 2005, 04:37 PM)
And more importantly: Whose gonna play them if they're made?
[right][snapback]290106[/snapback][/right]


I'd play a EUD map if it was great. If a map's uber enough, I'd play it even if I had to use EUDenabler.

ADDITION: "Maps with EUD will not be allowed in the database, mostly for the DLDB keeper's protection, as they will not be downloading or using EUDenabler."

If a DLDB keeper wanted to use EUDEnabler, isn't it their choice?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Yoshi da Sniper on 2005-08-16 at 18:41:31
QUOTE(Tuxedo Templar @ Aug 16 2005, 06:37 PM)
Whose gonna make EUD maps now anyway?

ADDITION:
And more importantly: Whose gonna play them if they're made?
[right][snapback]290106[/snapback][/right]

1 - I can bet that some communities will still "allow" this. Mainly because they have little consern for the safety of their users apposed to getting more of them.
2 - Sites will likely still host it.

ADDITION:
QUOTE(Voyager7456(MM) @ Aug 16 2005, 06:39 PM)
If a DLDB keeper wanted to use EUDEnabler, isn't it their choice?
[right][snapback]290116[/snapback][/right]

It is, but I'm not forcing them. If anything, I'm recommending they don't.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Tavrobel on 2005-08-16 at 18:42:15
QUOTE
Seeing as how I have been away for just a few days I would like to put my opinion about this EUDEnabler. Now I've been away from all the hype and crap and probably missed all the "OMG EUD's are back!" and stuff. I think that people should just let EUD's go and just go back to the way things were before EUD's. People were fine without them.

I think it's annoying looking at these page long replies with people saying how without EUD's Starcraft will die and stuff. I got over EUD's after Blizzard patched it and never looked back. I think everyone else should do the same.


That has been argued a majority of the time in the past pages, not that people think SC will die without them. But you are right, considering it has been what was said... many times.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Yoshi da Sniper on 2005-08-16 at 18:42:29
QUOTE(Tuxedo Templar @ Aug 16 2005, 06:38 PM)
Personally, I'd rather have seen SC mapping burn out in a blaze of EUD glory (even with the risks) than fade away.  I'd like to trust that someone would make a SC2 or something, but...
[right][snapback]290115[/snapback][/right]

It's not worth the risk. Would you like it if you joined a game and all of a sudden you have to spend an hour reinstalling everything, not to mention that some people dont know HOW to reinstall stuff?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Tuxedo Templar on 2005-08-16 at 18:42:32
QUOTE
If a map's uber enough, I'd play it even if I had to use EUDenabler.
Yeah, but would the average Cloudstriferoth667 play them? Would they even know what to do with an enabler even if they had the gumption to follow a link in the map to get it? Would they trust it? COULD they trust it?

You see what I'm getting on. Thanks to the combined weight of Yoshi and Blizzard's decisions, EUDs are relatively dead. And so is SC's future, as far as I can tell.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Voyager7456(MM) on 2005-08-16 at 18:42:48
QUOTE(Yoshi da Sniper @ Aug 16 2005, 04:41 PM)
It is, but I'm not forcing them. If anything, I'm recommending they don't.
[right][snapback]290117[/snapback][/right]


But EUD maps will not be allowed into the DLDB anyway, even if a DLDB Keeper tested the map, did everything that's needed for approval, etc?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by MapUnprotector on 2005-08-16 at 18:44:14
If you think it's dead that's fine, but the more you say it the more annoying it gets to read it. I don't believe that without EUD's SC is dead. SC will just be dead to those who are too sucked into the whole EUD thing and can't come back to how SC was before. Those people I think should just quit playing tongue.gif
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Tavrobel on 2005-08-16 at 18:45:23
QUOTE
It's not worth the risk. Would you like it if you joined a game and all of a sudden you have to spend an hour reinstalling everything, not to mention that some people dont know HOW to reinstall stuff?


Who is dumb enough that they don't know how to follow instructions in plain English text under the age of...
Wait, I'm going to take that back. No one follows instructions anymore. And no one actually knows how to use the English language perfectly anyway.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Tuxedo Templar on 2005-08-16 at 18:46:29
I'd have rather seen SC do something with itself than just sit on its legacy and rot.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by EzDay281 on 2005-08-16 at 18:46:40
QUOTE
Just becuase you don't have Enabler, doesn't mean you can't play normal maps. It simply gives you the ADDED option of playing EUD maps. Normal maps are always playable unless corrupted, and unplayable.

Did I say anything to the contrary?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Tavrobel on 2005-08-16 at 18:48:30
QUOTE
You see what I'm getting on. Thanks to the combined weight of Yoshi and Blizzard's decisions, EUDs are relatively dead. And so is SC's future, as far as I can tell.


Starcraft is NOT DEAD without EUDs. We were fine without it a month ago, and we were flourishing.

QUOTE
If you think it's dead that's fine, but the more you say it the more annoying it gets to read it. I don't believe that without EUD's SC is dead. SC will just be dead to those who are too sucked into the whole EUD thing and can't come back to how SC was before. Those people I think should just quit playing


He's right. If you think so, just quit. No one needs a great map maker to bestuck inthe past of something that was already patched out by Blizzard, and said as not being safe enough to use by Yoshi, the leader of SEN, which is the best map making community on the internet, and the CREATOR OF THE PROGRAM EUDENABLER, Heimdal, who said that there is infact, a risk in using this program, and that you accept full responsibility.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Voyager7456(MM) on 2005-08-16 at 18:48:51
QUOTE(Tuxedo Templar @ Aug 16 2005, 04:46 PM)
I'd have rather seen SC do something with itself than just sit on its legacy and rot.
[right][snapback]290130[/snapback][/right]


StarCraft's got plenty of fight left in it. I don't think we've seen the end of StarCraft yet.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by MapUnprotector on 2005-08-16 at 18:48:55
QUOTE(Tuxedo Templar @ Aug 16 2005, 06:46 PM)
I'd have rather seen SC do something with itself than just sit on its legacy and rot.
[right][snapback]290130[/snapback][/right]


[sarcasm]Yea, I would rather have Starcraft be infiltrated with hacks than sit on its legacy and rot as well. Anything is better than the crappy Starcraft we have now right? [/sarcasm]
Report, edit, etc...Posted by SoftWarewolf on 2005-08-16 at 18:49:00
that was quick..

if anyone got a dangerus or potentially dangerus sc map please pass it to me on[URL=mailto: softwarewolf@gmail.com]softwarewolf@gmail.com[/URL]

if tuxedo, heimdal and dk says its only on map memory and cant be used to execute .exe files or anything else malicious i belive it.

please feel free to change my mind.

is there really any proof on ANYTHING slightly harmfull that can be done using EUD's?
as far as i can see the worst thing it could do is hack your SC sound volume tongue.gif
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Tuxedo Templar on 2005-08-16 at 18:49:01
But you know, even if this isn't going to be publicly endoresed, it should still be explored nonetheless. There's only so many places in the range of EUD memory access someone could stick a virus, and thus it COULD be preventable.

Would you consider re-endoresing it if it were made virus-proof?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Tavrobel on 2005-08-16 at 18:51:50
QUOTE
I'd have rather seen SC do something with itself than just sit on its legacy and rot.


So you are willing to believe that Starcraft is dead?
If you think so, you might as well leave Starcraft map making now, Tuxedo. We have not always had this, for seven years in fact, and we survived this entire time. What makes you think we can't keep going now?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Tuxedo Templar on 2005-08-16 at 18:51:59
QUOTE
Starcraft is NOT DEAD without EUDs. We were fine without it a month ago, and we were flourishing.
SC's future is. No, it already was. UMS maps have about reached there limit. Extended terrain has been explored ad nausium. Modding is relatively unpopular. Melee scene has become redundant (still active, though).

It's not going anywhere. The only real reason we exist here is in anticipation of continuation; either with SC2 or a W3 mod or whatever. That hasn't happened yet, and I have limits to my patience, personally.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Voyager7456(MM) on 2005-08-16 at 18:53:21
QUOTE(JohnDS)
I visit SEN on a daily basis as well as TL and some others. All I can say on the matter is that if you play D2 or know anyone who does, you'll notice they banned over 36,000 accounts in one day the other week. The accounts were using D2Loader, map hacks, or some other 3rd party software. The battle.net team is taking any hack seriously and closing accounts as they find them. No warnings, no passing "Go", no collecting $200.00. Official word. Do not Use 3rd Party Software To Modify How Blizzard Games Are Played.


So, Blizzard decides to say something about the whole thing. They are watching us! ohmy.gif
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Tavrobel on 2005-08-16 at 18:54:04
QUOTE
But you know, even if this isn't going to be publicly endoresed, it should still be explored nonetheless. There's only so many places in the range of EUD memory access someone could stick a virus, and thus it COULD be preventable.

Would you consider re-endoresing it if it were made virus-proof?


Nothing is virus-proof completely. Even security systems like McAfee or Norton Anti-Virus is not completely protected by a virus. And yes, if it were made safe enough, perhaps, but I have acceptted that EUDs have been effectively made dead by Blizzard's decison to patch them out, and by Yoshi's decision to remove Enabler.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Yoshi da Sniper on 2005-08-16 at 18:56:09
QUOTE(Tuxedo Templar @ Aug 16 2005, 06:42 PM)
Yeah, but would the average Cloudstriferoth667 play them?  Would they even know what to do with an enabler even if they had the gumption to follow a link in the map to get it?  Would they trust it?  COULD they trust it?

You see what I'm getting on.  Thanks to the combined weight of Yoshi and Blizzard's decisions, EUDs are relatively dead.  And so is SC's future, as far as I can tell.
[right][snapback]290123[/snapback][/right]
I'm sorry, but I would rather make a few people angry then being responsible for who knows how many people's computers totally going wacked, when I could of taken action and I didn't. You're right, there may not be a threat at all and SC could have used EUDs all the time. But I'm not taking my chances, and neither should anyone else. There are a lot of people who are misinformed about this matter.


QUOTE(SoftWarewolf @ Aug 16 2005, 06:49 PM)
if anyone got a dangerus or potentially dangerus sc map please pass it to me on[URL=mailto: softwarewolf@gmail.com]softwarewolf@gmail.com[/URL]
[right][snapback]290137[/snapback][/right]
I don't think anyone will email you, but trust me, its possible, and they work. Thats the entire reason why blizzard was quick to make 1.13b. I would not have done this if it were purely rumor.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by MapUnprotector on 2005-08-16 at 18:56:23
QUOTE(Tuxedo Templar @ Aug 16 2005, 06:51 PM)
SC's future is.  No, it already was.  UMS maps have about reached there limit.  Extended terrain has been explored ad nausium.  Modding is relatively unpopular.  Melee scene has become redundant (still active, though).

It's not going anywhere.  The only real reason we exist here is in anticipation of continuation; either with SC2 or a W3 mod or whatever.  That hasn't happened yet, and I have limits to my patience, personally.
[right][snapback]290141[/snapback][/right]


[sarcasm]Tux has made me realize what a waste of time Starcraft has become. I'll go do what the last sentence of my signature says, because I've wasted my life on Starcraft. [/sarcasm]
Report, edit, etc...Posted by SoftWarewolf on 2005-08-16 at 18:57:20
Tavrobel: a virus is a completely different thing.

this is about a security breach (if there is any). and its fully possible to make a eud hack that's perfectly safe.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Tavrobel on 2005-08-16 at 18:57:38
QUOTE
SC's future is. No, it already was. UMS maps have about reached there limit. Extended terrain has been explored ad nausium. Modding is relatively unpopular. Melee scene has become redundant (still active, though).

It's not going anywhere. The only real reason we exist here is in anticipation of continuation; either with SC2 or a W3 mod or whatever. That hasn't happened yet, and I have limits to my patience, personally.


No. People stay because they want to play a seven year old game that has survived through everything that hes been thrown its way. People even died because of Starcraft, and Starcraft survived the bad press and animosity thrown towards it. If you would like to make those deaths vain, or if you truly think Starcraft is dead, and that it has reached its limits, then go, leave, forget about those you have come to help the last years explore map making. I for one will be happy to see you go if you truly believe this. But if you don't, then stay, and live out this miracle of gaming as long as it is ours to bear, until SC2 comes out. Then everyone can do whatever they want.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by The_Lead_Factor on 2005-08-16 at 18:59:02
ok seeing as just over the past few months sen was becoming biger and biger i see no reason for ANYONE to quit starcraft now.......we have lasted up to 7 years with starcraft(5 or 6 without anything like extended terrain and 3rd party editors) y cant we last a few more years like this
Next Page (8)