QUOTE
I did, and it breaks down like this:
m.r.bob: Well, a safe verson would be nice.
Tavrobel: Maybe, but I don't know anyone who would be willing to go against blizzard's wishes like that.
m.r.bob: Well I think that some SENers could make it. There would be going agaist blizzard's wishes I guess. But what I think blizzard really wants is perfectly safe EUDs. There is no reason for them to hate EUDs besides the security threat they provide.
It actually goes more something like this.
First line same.
Tavrobel: Who would go through the effort?
SIDENOT: I don't care if you go against Blizzard's will. That's your choice, and you know what risks are involved.
Third Line same.
QUOTE
Too bad what you say is supposed to be RELEVANT to what I say, especially since you quoted my post.
But it does not make sense anymore because we both made no sense.
QUOTE
Now I think (I have nothing to back this up, so I'm making an assumption here) that it is definatly possible to make a EUD enabler that would make EUDs as safe as starcraft currently is without them.
QUOTE
Now you can disagree with the above paragraph, but I already know you do, so don't disagree with it here unless you have program er knowledge of starcraft like DK does, and if you do have that kind of knowledge, specify exactly why it would be too much effort or impossible to make EUDs that safe.
This is all you.
QUOTE
ADDITION:
PS: Tavrobel is still a jerk.
Don't worry. I will always disdain the stupid and criticize the moronic. So call me whatever you want.