Staredit Network

Staredit Network -> Miscellaneous -> The Person Below me is a....
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Oo.Insane.oO on 2006-06-15 at 12:03:17
Yeah with 108 too smile.gif

The person below me is a poopface
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Mp)7-7 on 2006-06-15 at 12:05:16
Nope sorry


The person below me is not at home!
Report, edit, etc...Posted by dumbducky on 2006-06-15 at 15:23:48
Zarquwi may have been just a figurehead, but even figureheads do some work. Apparently, we managed to recover tons of information from documents and his laptop after we searched the house.

Source
Report, edit, etc...Posted by PwnPirate on 2006-06-15 at 15:55:07
QUOTE
I dont think anyone on earth today wants to see cloning become available. Especially no one wants to see someone that loks exactly like they do. Even though you wouldnt see them at the same age as you because they would be made like a baby whenever you gave your DNA (jeans or whatever)!

Ok first of all, since you obviously missed 3 pages of discussion for some unapparent reason, I'll tell you this flat out: many people want to see cloning become available. Your egocentric remark doesn't change that fact. Also, you seem to have absolutely no idea of what a clone is. A clone is not you, a clone is a person with your genes. A clone would lead a completely different life and would develope characteristics probably much more differently than you have. In fact if you and your clone were separated by a mile or two for a few years, chances are you would never find your clone again unless you had his/her personal information. Also, you really shouldn't be trying to argue about your point of view if you have absolutely no information about the subject.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by xMCx on 2006-06-15 at 17:41:57
I'm against cloning 100%, unless it is used for medical healing. Do you think clones would have souls? Also, I wouldn't want to do God's work.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by PwnPirate on 2006-06-15 at 18:58:06
QUOTE
I'm against cloning 100%, unless it is used for medical healing. Do you think clones would have souls? Also, I wouldn't want to do God's work.

Oh my god..
Report, edit, etc...Posted by FatalException on 2006-06-15 at 21:44:07
QUOTE(7-7 @ Jun 15 2006, 09:01 AM)
I dont think anyone on earth today wants to see cloning become available.  Especially no one wants to see someone that loks exactly like they do.  Even though you wouldnt see them at the same age as you because they would be made like a baby whenever you gave your DNA (jeans or whatever)!
[right][snapback]506975[/snapback][/right]

1)As PwnPirate said, "you obviously missed 3 pages of discussion."
2 [response to bold])You mean sort of like... Oh, I dunno... An identical twin??
Anyways, cloning the tissue seems fine, but the book House of the Scorpion definately distorted my views a bit. you should read it.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Pyro_Maniak14 on 2006-06-16 at 02:21:38
Yay! Zarquwi is dead! It's pointless to celebrate his death since someone even as crazy as him is going to take his place. Like in this movie I saw, The Seige, once you kill one terrorist cell, another takes it's place. You may be able to kill Osama and his high ranking officers, but the idea of terrorism and dying for their religion or whatever will NEVER die. Now we just have about 50 more terrorists to kill in air raids...
Report, edit, etc...Posted by JaFF on 2006-06-16 at 02:24:59
Homosexuals are the force, splitting the church today.

QUOTE
Whether the faithful look upon their gay and lesbian fellows with acceptance and love or turn their backs in fear and loathing depends mostly on how literally the faithful take biblical references interpreted as condeming homosexuality.

It depends on whether they attempt to follow the Old Testament's Laws of Moses or the "one great commandment" uttered by Jesus Christ in the New Testament, "Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself."


QUOTE
"Homosexual activity, as distinguished from homosexual orientation, is morally wrong," wrote Roman Catholic Bishop Francis Mugavero of Brooklyn in 1976


What do you think ? Are gays usual people in the eyes of God, or are they "morally wrong" in God's eyes ?

QUOTE
"Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself."


Shouldn't this cover gays allso ?

Please don't turn it into a "I don't belive in God" discussion.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Pyro_Maniak14 on 2006-06-16 at 02:26:32
Cloning is playing God basically, and thats not what we should be doing. Even if we could clone people, only the rich could do it, because I don't think replicating an entire person's brain and nervous system is going to be equvialent to a Big Mac.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Pyro_Maniak14 on 2006-06-16 at 02:29:07
The church is just stupid to fight against gays and lesbians, because God says its unholy to be gay doesn't make being gay wrong. The church just wants attention and fighting the gay community is a way of obtaining it.

PS: Its like... 2:30am EST... Go to sleep.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Pyro_Maniak14 on 2006-06-16 at 02:31:51
I just say punish a man if he's guilty of terrorist acts, and if he is guilty, you have every right to torture him to obtain critical information, vital to the/a country's security and population.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by TheDaddy0420 on 2006-06-16 at 11:48:50
haha the church wants attention? What are you, 6 years old?

Being born homosexual is not bad it the church's eyes. But the practice of gay sex is seen as bad.
Plus why even bring this disscussion up? Its just another "I hate the church, we all hate the church or any religion" topic.
Let the Church decide what they want to do, who cares I mean it is "Corrupt power hungry full of lies enity"
Report, edit, etc...Posted by TheDaddy0420 on 2006-06-16 at 11:50:35
QUOTE(Pyro_Maniak14 @ Jun 15 2006, 10:21 PM)
Yay! Zarquwi is dead! It's pointless to celebrate his death since someone even as crazy as him is going to take his place. Like in this movie I saw, The Seige, once you kill one terrorist cell, another takes it's place. You may be able to kill Osama and his high ranking officers, but the idea of terrorism and dying for their religion or whatever will NEVER die. Now we just have about 50 more terrorists to kill in air raids...
[right][snapback]507473[/snapback][/right]


So you would rather have him alive? And have all the information we got from the strikes givin back?

Haha kellimus can't provide proof for his radical statements hahahahahahahaha
Report, edit, etc...Posted by JaFF on 2006-06-16 at 12:42:58
QUOTE(TheDaddy0420 @ Jun 16 2006, 06:48 PM)
Plus why even bring this disscussion up?  Its just another "I hate the church, we all hate the church or any religion"  topic. 
Let the Church decide what they want to do, who cares I mean it is "Corrupt power hungry full of lies enity"
[right][snapback]507609[/snapback][/right]

It will not become "I hate the church" topic if people will not go off topic.

The church wants attention ? Why ? It's not a pop star that wants cheap attention.

The church is not stupid. It depends on the way they percieve what was written.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Shapechanger on 2006-06-16 at 13:13:24
The chruch tends to argue with everything, and at stupid points, in my opinion.

Being homosexual is not an active decision (most of the time), it's a bit of wiring in you mind that got crossed, or possibly too much estrogen in a male, or too much testasterone in a female. Whatever the case, it's usually 100% natural. How can you argue against something that happens naturally?

And then they go and argue against Stem Cell research saying it's not natural, and "kills the unborn", when in reality you only have to remove one cell from the embryo and that single cell will continue to multiply on its own, and the child will develop without deformities, mental defects, etc.

Of course, that's a whole other issue...
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Deathawk on 2006-06-16 at 15:42:49
What goes around comes around, I guess.

It's not like they don't deserve it for what they did.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Voyager7456(MM) on 2006-06-16 at 16:58:55
Considering that they've never had a trial and are not being charged with anything, how can you say that?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by KABOOM on 2006-06-16 at 17:58:51
their is a reason there's female and male because they reproduce gays cant do that. they might be able to have "fun" and have pleasure eww for gay guys. Church does what it wants for more power but not working out to well
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Deathawk on 2006-06-16 at 18:14:01
Well, against KNOWN terrorists, I should have clarified.

If they're known to do this stuff... then you might as well. Not if they're suspected, unless there's enough evidence to prove otherwise.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by CheeZe on 2006-06-16 at 18:24:48
QUOTE(TheDaddy0420 @ Jun 15 2006, 12:34 AM)
If Im not mistaken there is already a Red Cross station in Gitmo, they did have complaints awhile ago, but not now since they were let in to inspect.  Im pretty sure of that.
[right][snapback]506866[/snapback][/right]


You saying that sort of defeats the purpose of what I'm asking for: sources.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by MillenniumArmy on 2006-06-16 at 18:33:21
I really don't get why some christians see being gay in general as wrong. In the bible it only defines marriage as a bondship between man and woman; that's it. So THEN that's when certain people then interpret this to mean that gay marriage is wrong, since it uses the word "marriage." However, this does NOT mean that being gay in general is wrong. I mean, if being gay is something you've become naturally, not by choice, then how the hell can it be considered a "sin?" Sins are voluntary actions done by humans. Besides, there's LOTS of gay christians just as religious as straight people.

I understand why people see gay marriage as wrong, but not being gay in general.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Mr.Camo on 2006-06-16 at 21:27:29
QUOTE(n2o-SiMpSoNs @ Jun 14 2006, 04:59 PM)
tattle tail
[right][snapback]506745[/snapback][/right]


Ear drums rupturing vs. not having them rupture? Hmm..
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Voyager7456(MM) on 2006-06-16 at 21:30:57
Interesting, neither of my parents could hear it.

As many other posters said: why not just use the vibrate setting?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Tdnfthe1 on 2006-06-16 at 21:32:01
QUOTE(MillenniumArmy @ Jun 16 2006, 04:32 PM)
I really don't get why some christians see being gay in general as wrong. In the bible it only defines marriage as a bondship between man and woman; that's it. So THEN that's when certain people then interpret this to mean that gay marriage is wrong, since it uses the word "marriage." However, this does NOT mean that being gay in general is wrong. I mean, if being gay is something you've become naturally, not by choice, then how the hell can it be considered a "sin?" Sins are voluntary actions done by humans. Besides, there's LOTS of gay christians just as religious as straight people.

I understand why people see gay marriage as wrong, but not being gay in general.
[right][snapback]507823[/snapback][/right]

Nice neutrality point, as usual millenium. Now look at it like this. The bible says to love your neighbor and to not be as sinful(this isn't quoted but more like the main idea of what the bible is saying) as to lust after another woman or man that is as you are. If you think behind the reasoning of it, this is different from "Gay Love" and "Gay... Exploration". Men arousing other men was actually a form of satan worshipping that dates as far back as the 13th century(as far as I know). So when you think about the meanings and reasons behind being gay and what the bible quotes say.... you can kinda grasp your own understanding of it. Loving a man so much that you want to engage in... sex with him... doesn't sound so evil to me. Many people are gay but don't take it that far, the thought just crosses his or her mind but then they come to grip with the fact that society won't allow it. And you're too scared to try it. Also, remember that in the bible there is a quote denouncing the possibility of the bible coinciding itself. Therefor most things that
----->X<------ are usually because someone intentionally tried to twist it that way. As far as what I think, gays are gay and so is everyone else. But the gay that is about exploration and senseless... sex... is probably what the bible is talking about. Cuz if you read it, it does say something about watch your mind from wondering.

~Tdnfthe1
Next Page (92)