Report, edit, etc...Posted by Demaris on 2006-02-02 at 21:18:39
QUOTE(procuress @ Jan 27 2006, 06:35 AM)
It is like a queen trying to infest nexus. It wouldn't work. But bush's lying spree caught us on the run...
[right][snapback]414183[/snapback][/right]
[right][snapback]414183[/snapback][/right]
And It causes a lot of crashing
War = problematic
No war = problematic.
Lose-Lose
Lots of people die either way.
Also, YOU CANNOT KNOW WHETHER OR NOT THE WAR PREVENTED ANY ATTACKS.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by HolySin on 2006-02-02 at 22:43:49
Yes, there would have been problems with people and government with or without war. If you please one, you'll piss off the other. Bush does get bashed way too much. I just don't get why people are making such a huge deal with the whole "Bush is lieing" thing. He knows it, we certainly know it. It's just about oil. Big whoop, elections will be nearing soon so stop crying and just hope for a neutral president.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by The_Dead_One on 2006-02-04 at 22:39:26
Bush-Bashing's fun because it's so easy and true.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by (DI)Yulla on 2006-02-04 at 23:13:29
As famous saying goes:
If they bomb us, then it is genocidal, international terrorism that poses threat to the world.
If we bomb their home, then it is justified retaliation.
This isn't right. As I said before, setting a government in Iraq is like trying to infest nexus with a queen. It will fall apart as soon as we leave even it if ever works.
If they bomb us, then it is genocidal, international terrorism that poses threat to the world.
If we bomb their home, then it is justified retaliation.
This isn't right. As I said before, setting a government in Iraq is like trying to infest nexus with a queen. It will fall apart as soon as we leave even it if ever works.