Staredit Network

It's all based on the situation, and in most situations it's wrong.

Not even gonna vote cause there is no middle ground to this. Except maybe don't care.

Killing may be wrong to some people, however overall killing is right. It is human's to kill one another for either serious reasons or stupid reasons. There has been killing since man was born, and therefore there always will be killings. So I again say yes killing is right, as it is in our nature.

I said killing is right.

It is a natural thing ur body wants to do. A man kills the one u love, and u and revenge, it is a natural thing. We are animals, and we only THINK we are smart. Dogs probably think they are the smartest, hell, they make us give them food, shelter and they dont have to do anything!

But it really does matter.

Killing for survival is okay since every living organism must kill for survival. Survival of the fittest. Killing for fun is not okay.

lol pwnt.

One kill is ok...It is just I don't like multiple kills...IF it is self defense, it is ok, but death penaltys aren't ok to me...IT shows that the police are scared sort of.

I votes yes cause its funny...

What is pwnt? And Killing cuz its funny should mean u get sniped u . But, w/e ...

Pwn = Own
Pwnt = Owned

Killing for sport is too stupid, especially since it's not evenly matched.

if you think killing is alright. I'll call Kim Il Jong of north korea and say we can have a nuclear war right now.

Do you wanna protect the ones you love? Then kill the ones attacking them!

Do you wanna make some money killing someone? Well toobad! Seriously the topic is too broad...it all depends on the situation....if osama was outside the window...not only would bush reward you for bringin him in...but heaven would reward you for your act of removeing a terror to that which is still good.

Seriously it could happen O.O

killing another human being is wrong.
so many problems arise from someone dying... if one day we can find a way to live forever, then all will be well and any threat will seem like a joke

question: why do christians cry over a dead person? shouldnt they be rejoicing because that person is now with God?

They are happy and sad at the same time

So many problems? Bang I killed you, your dead. Game over.

now, hopefully, someone will want revenge and justice for my death and will hunt you down
the story of my death is all over the news
Headline: Murderer on the loose? Lock your doors and shut that window tight, there's a murderer on the loose.
Police chief of where I live makes a speech that he will catch the murderer and bring him to justice.
I have a funeral and my family and friends are there.
My whole school knows of my death and turns most students extremely hostile to any wrong-doer.
When a student sees someone trying to commit a crime, he/she beats the shiz out of him/her, resulting in a news report on that event..........and so on

god is still gonna make you goto hell since you've killed somebody. you call that self defense? i still call that murder. hell. if you think killings right, then hell is the place for you!

i'd agree with most of the people on this topic that taking away another person's life is wrong, but there is always murder crimes happening almost everywhere in reality...If you kill someone in defending yourself from a guy holding a gun up to your head make you a murderer, or is it a non-criminal defense?

most kid's these days think killing people in video games is fun, but they gotta learn killing people in reality isn't the same thing...trust me i have seen kids that are getting influenced by those kinds of games(such as gta,doom,etc...)

i'm not sure if this is related to the topic or not, but what do you say about the death penalty? is killing criminals that commit murder or serious crimes justice?

If someone commited a horrible crime(s) & he is sentanced to highest penalty, this penalty should be : ROT IN PRISION FOR THE REST OF YOUR LIFE & NOT Die quickly. The prision people like that should rot in should be HELL ON EARTH, becawse taht will frighten potential criminals so they dont commit crimes. like any system taht controlls people, there must be cold-blooded figures, not emotions, if statistic says - ROT, then ROT (btw, i dunno what statistic says, but it's mine opinion). I think we should say "F**C you, European standards that say, taht you gotto take it easy even on the worsest criminals" allthow i dunno how to evade those buracratical rules, becawse Brucell has lot of influence now, but in theory, it should help.

What if you we're killing for god's will?

O.o

Well, if you're killing for "God's Will" then you're most likely insane.

I would rather kill for my will.

i'd rather see humanity die off.

You should have had a "both" column. This is because i belive people would murder 1 million people or a lot at one time, or ever a human being should be sentenced to death. But i also think maybe it was a mistake and the person shouldn't be killed for maybe wrong judgment or somthing. So it goes both ways.

Guys, violence is right. But killing ain't. It's because if you kill, there are still loved ones for him even if he's immoral. When someone's threatening you, try to maim him, instead of killing him. Unless of course, he's shooting at you, thats different. But killing aint right, but can be justified when the situation is justiced. Oh and, don't be stupid enough to pull a gun when the guys holding a gun at you.

People are animals. Nature says: "kill to survive". If someone threatens your life your instincts will kill him for you (or atleast try). You cant be sent to jail just cuz your a human with normal instincts.

Some people have used up their right to live, therefore I think it's right, in some circumstances, such as the case with Saddam Hussein, he's an example of someone who has used up their right to live.

ADDITION:


Nature doesn't say "Kill to survive". Our instincts say "eat to survive", and killing is sometimes a necessary factor behind of being able to eat.