Staredit Network

Report, edit, etc...Posted by Felagund on 2005-09-06 at 19:35:51

If you don't want new gameplay, there really is no reason to make StarCraft 2.

Report, edit, etc...Posted by MapUnprotector on 2005-09-06 at 19:46:57

QUOTE(Felagund @ Sep 6 2005, 07:35 PM)

If you don't want new gameplay, there really is no reason to make StarCraft 2.
[right][snapback]306957[/snapback][/right]

... new gameplay as in how the basics of the game are played. And yes, if they totally redo SC it will most definitely suck, which I bet it would anyway.

But most importantly, as I said before the graphics shouldn't be the only reason gameplay is changed for the worse.

Report, edit, etc...Posted by mr.ex on 2005-09-11 at 13:08:09

if there is a sc 2 with 3D graphics, they should make new units and all that cr@p

but really, it doesnt matter if it is 2D or 3D Why?
because, SC owns.

Report, edit, etc...Posted by Revelade on 2005-09-11 at 13:27:22

QUOTE(mr.ex @ Sep 11 2005, 12:08 PM)

if there is a sc 2 with 3D graphics, they should make new units and all that cr@p

but really, it doesnt matter if it is 2D or 3D Why?
because, SC owns.
[right][snapback]311026[/snapback][/right]

2D:
less lag
more players
more units
easier development for Blizzard

Next Page (3)