Report, edit, etc...Posted by SacredElf on 2005-08-28 at 11:45:24
When u vote please leave a comment 
i would really hate if blizzard make sc2 whit 3D graphics like wc3, and i would really hate if are the same as actuals , i love the editor graphic but is just me maybe, now Vote
[center]2D graphics
3D graphics
[/center]
(There's no sc screenshot, bcause u see it everyday)
i would really hate if blizzard make sc2 whit 3D graphics like wc3, and i would really hate if are the same as actuals
, i love the editor graphic but is just me maybe, now Vote[center]2D graphics
3D graphics
[/center](There's no sc screenshot, bcause u see it everyday)
Report, edit, etc...Posted by EzDay281 on 2005-08-28 at 13:11:21
First of all, shouldn't this be in gaming?
Second, the chances of Blizzard making SC2 2-d are too low to bother considering.
Thirdly, why did you use a Wc3 pic? That SC Mod someone was making would have been better, or SC Ghost, since the first one actualy looks like StarCraft and the second one is actualy coming from Blizzard, even if they're not making it.
Second, the chances of Blizzard making SC2 2-d are too low to bother considering.
Thirdly, why did you use a Wc3 pic? That SC Mod someone was making would have been better, or SC Ghost, since the first one actualy looks like StarCraft and the second one is actualy coming from Blizzard, even if they're not making it.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Zycorax on 2005-08-28 at 13:30:26
I prefer RTS in 2D, but off course SC in 3D could have been cool. But I hope on 2D anyway.
And... What the hell is wrong with the Siege Tanks on the first pic?
And... What the hell is wrong with the Siege Tanks on the first pic?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by SacredElf on 2005-08-28 at 13:59:21
this is a game discussion 
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Pie_Sniper on 2005-08-28 at 15:05:21
I would burn their eyes out if it wasn't 2D!!!!!! So hard to control stuff in 3D...
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Toothfariy on 2005-08-28 at 15:13:03
QUOTE
Pie_Sniper Posted Today, 01:05 PM
I would burn their eyes out if it wasn't 2D!!!!!! So hard to control stuff in 3D...
I would burn their eyes out if it wasn't 2D!!!!!! So hard to control stuff in 3D...
i totaly ageee
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Lisk on 2005-08-28 at 15:45:47
3d if executed better than wc3 =0
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Oo.Insane.oO on 2005-08-28 at 15:50:43
I like the old graphics that they have now but 3D would be cool for bounding n stuff
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Syphon on 2005-08-28 at 16:15:25
make it look exactley like revolution and im good
Report, edit, etc...Posted by VizuaL on 2005-08-28 at 16:18:24
3D U FOOL!
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Staredit.Net Essence on 2005-08-28 at 16:44:30
They will make it 3D. I would love it to be 3D, but not the type of 3D that WC3 is. They shouldn't make it cartoonish 3D graphics.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Deathknight on 2005-08-28 at 20:51:07
They'd make it 3D, but I'd love to see it 2D.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Doodan on 2005-08-28 at 22:02:36
I think that whenever they get around to making a SC2 (the year 2525), then they will be able to make much nicer looking and much more efficient 3D graphics compared to WC3.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Fronter on 2005-08-28 at 22:04:52
They might make it 3D, but I would prefer 2D, it just fits better with Starcraft, and is easier to control with.
If they do make it 3D, like Kellimus said, it should not be not like Warcraft III, I really hated how everyone on that game looked, it was just a failure (My opinion).
If they do make it 3D, like Kellimus said, it should not be not like Warcraft III, I really hated how everyone on that game looked, it was just a failure (My opinion).
Report, edit, etc...Posted by xszerg on 2005-08-28 at 22:09:56
3D starcraft would be awsome
Report, edit, etc...Posted by HorroR on 2005-08-28 at 22:47:05
I'm more on 3D, but I think it really depends what they do with the actual game and how they pull off the graphics.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by m2nello on 2005-08-28 at 22:47:57
It has to be 3d or it will prolly be left behind by other games
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Doodan on 2005-08-28 at 23:02:41
QUOTE
It has to be 3d or it will prolly be left behind by other games
Haven't you noticed that when you click Artanis too many times, he says "I know it's not 3D!" or something like that. Seems like 3D was the standard back then too. SC2 WILL be 3D.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by SacredElf on 2005-08-29 at 14:29:33
also he says "Is not warcraft on the space" or something like that
Report, edit, etc...Posted by scwizard on 2005-08-29 at 14:51:55
2D TO THE MAX!
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Voyager7456(MM) on 2005-08-29 at 16:57:34
I'd definitely prefer 2D to 3D. Less lag... better looking than WC3... 
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Felagund on 2005-08-29 at 17:18:29
WarCraft III is old guys. It would most likely look better than The Battle for Middle-Earth engine, which is a bit of an update from the Command and Conquer: Generals engine.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by SacredElf on 2005-08-29 at 17:25:50
i like the last one, but that would lag all the games
Report, edit, etc...Posted by RexyRex on 2005-08-29 at 17:31:57
The next StarCraft is going to be 3D. Get over it. 
Report, edit, etc...Posted by l2k-Warrior on 2005-08-29 at 17:43:23
Windows 95/98/NT
Pentium 90 or higher
16 MB RAM
DirectX-Compatible SVGA Video Card
Microsoft-Compatible Mouse
Double-Speed CD-ROM
(Quad Speed for Cinematics)
Thats what SC is all about
Pentium 90 or higher
16 MB RAM
DirectX-Compatible SVGA Video Card
Microsoft-Compatible Mouse
Double-Speed CD-ROM
(Quad Speed for Cinematics)
Thats what SC is all about