Uh huh... We have laws right? Even thought there are punishments people still break them, correct? Now you're saying that without a SINGLE law against murderers (excluding revenge) and rapists etc, no one will do nothing wrong? I HIGHLY doubt it. Now... say if a person decides to kill people... since there is no government... TECHNICALLY hes not doing anything wrong... So he has nothing to fear and will continue to do his 'work'. Now say if we got attacked by a terrorist. Since there is NO army there will be NO protection leaving everyone in the world vulnerable. Now I know what you're thinking: "We won't need to worry about that because everyone will be equal." Sure... but there will always be that ONE person who doesn't care. A utopian society is so impossible right now because we have countless civil wars in poor countries, religious wars, wars, gang wars, murderers etc going on so I highly doubt you could convince a Palastinian to stop fighting against their mortal enemy. Now... let me re-address the economy. If we have no economy we won't have anything. Since their's no government everything would be free and people would just take as they choose. Then of course like I said, there will always be that ONE person who has to have everything. Then of course you have people with a desire for power. With no government and army or order, there will be nothing in his/her way. Yes I agree a utopian society will be a great idea but its not possible. That's like telling someone not to believe in God because there's no proof... its just not possible.
The thing is, your wrong. No economy doesn't mean no supplies. Robots will do all the work. They will take care of growing food, making other products, and repairs if necessary. There would be motive for any of those random murders, thus we wouldn't need any armies nor protection. People tend to break laws because their motive is very strong or they are insane, which I addressed in my previous post.
I also noticed you are looking at this at a very current perspective. You brought up the Palastinians and used some present tense words. This would be the future, and a utopian society is impossible currently. It is impossible to create a utopian society without the shedding of blood; I never said it would be easy or a peaceful way of getting to that point. Before the creation of a utopian society occurs, the erradication of all those who oppose the dominant will have to take place. I know, that is very disturbing, but people would either learn not to oppose, join the dominant force through fear, or be destroyed. When there is absolutely no opposition, that utopian society will slowly be created. So basically, before the Utopian society is created, all "terrorists" would be dead. Sad isn't it?
Nobody wouldn't take more than they need if everything was free. What is the purpose? Robots would do all the work and give us food. They would also understand the amount of food each person needs through their AI. Yet again, the greed for materials would have lack of motive and it wouldn't be such a huge problem.
As far as a person who wants power goes, they would need support. People who don't want a government don't need to get in that person's way, they just simply need to ignore them. That person would have no power even if they tried.
It's awkward how this thread went from AI Robots towards Utopian Societies. Anyways, your move Sherlock.
Maybe don't use a purely digital system. Half-analog (i.e. chemical based) and half digital.
*Red2Blue shifts back into the AI talk* I believe that AI is indeed possible in the future. Heck, maybe we will see some of it in our lifetimes. Who knows. All I know is that I want to see what is going to happen! There are four generations of software.
First generation, think of basic one function programs in cars.
Second generation, think qbasic.
Third Generation, think visualbasic.
Fourth Generation, AI.
With the current software updates literally every computer company with the money has been able to create a replica of a robot doing a specific task. One company has made the head, another has made a robot able to walk around, another with sensors to detect depth and location (it can tell what is a male or female with 1% inaccuracy, hey, you can't tell a guy from a girl if the guy has long hair okay?), another one with sound receptors and sound detection, and another one that can actually speak! Amazing! If all the computer companies came together they could essentially create an independant robot that can move talk walk do everything that a human can with insane abilities. Too bad though, the early productions would probably cost billions if not trillions of dollars to compose. Who knows where they would go.
QUOTE
The thing is, your wrong. No economy doesn't mean no supplies. Robots will do all the work. They will take care of growing food, making other products, and repairs if necessary. There would be motive for any of those random murders, thus we wouldn't need any armies nor protection. People tend to break laws because their motive is very strong or they are insane, which I addressed in my previous post.
Simple first generation robots are already doing all the work. If we had complete ai robots doing all the work then the human race would begin to cease to exist. There would be no jobs for people, there would be no income, we would all die to the tireless, fatigueless, literally indestructable, living army of metal.
Just because a robot has complete AI, doesn't mean that it can't be restrained from certain actions. Robots can only do what we program them to. We wouldn't cease to exist, we would just be very lethargic.
Lethargy is already common enough as is. And who said anything about making robots?
Why not education programs that adapt to a child's learning needs?
QUOTE
Well... AI is... possible... but not to the extent of the human mind... Humans feel pain, agony, fear, love, happiness, depression, suffering, anger, delight... so many feelings... It'd be impossible to create AI emotions. Just like in the movies... AI would probably rage out of control and backfire. You can't 100% control everything. You can't control wild animals, murderers, fires, floods, or death, etc... therefore how could you control an AI being?
That's all backwash, I'll have you know that dozens of natural disasters are being controlled daily. Wild animals can easily be 100% controlled and real life isn't "Just like in the movies...". I'm sure that the intelligent programmers who create AI know exactly if their machine will rage out of control and backfire.
QUOTE(atlass @ Dec 31 2005, 10:28 PM)
If AI did exist, would we be morally responsible for it as though it was human?
[right][snapback]395388[/snapback][/right]
No. Hence AI is ARTIFICIAL intelligence. It wouldn't REALLY be alive. It would be a very complex and well through-out program made to IMITATE life and PRETEND to be alive. It wouldn't be real though. Also, it should have a built in shut-down code in it to deactive it if it could out of control.
Ok like I said before... Everything with AI "learns" and if AI doesn't then please prove me wrong. Now... your saying that we would live off robots abd they would do anything for us... Unless you give everyone in the world implants that balance out every emotion (live the movie Equilibrium, if you've seen it) then ya... a U. Society would be possible. But now, take away the economy and every corporation would be crushed and people would be in disarray... Like you said... you can't make a U-S without bloodshed... Well duh... but if you really want one... there will most likely be A LOT of bloodshed. Sure if everyone was equal, the world would be a better place but what is to stop someone from being violent? What if there is choas? Who will settle it? Robots? Since we won't have a gov't what would happen? People wouldn't know who to follow since there is no real power so like I said... anyone could take over with the right influence and power. Now that I have THAT out of the way... What does it mean for religion? Im just curious as to what you have to say... If the U-S doesn't affect it please tell me...
No, the power subject isn't taken care of because you insist that somebody would just go and take power. People aren't idiots, you must keep that in mind. A person won't come to power because people wouldn't support it. Now that's truly taken care of. Is religion really that big of an issue? Robots have free will and would follow any religion they want with AI or no religion at all. People would simply follow their own religion. There really isn't any problem with religion since all extremists would have been taken care of. This conversation is now transforming into religion, so I'll end it with this.
The robots may have absolute AI, but we would still dominate them. Robots are as powerful as we program them to be. Since we can control them, we wouldn't need to work, we wouldn't need to bicker, we wouldn't have anybody extreme for there would be nothing to be extreme about, we wouldn't need an economy, we wouldn't need a government, we wouldn't have to think. We invent the future, so we could make inventions that invent it for us.
Ok... first of all I just asked for your opinion on religion and how if would be affect... I wasn't changing the subject! Nice try on trying to "end" this discussion... Anyways... why would the extremists be gone? And it's really funny how you didn't respond to my "AI learns" thing... Funny... As for the "let robots do everything for us part..." Whats the point of robots taking over everything we've done? Have you heard of a little thing called self-reliance? A lot of people follow it because they don't have the need to rely on people. Now you're stating that mankind must RELY on robots and don't even argue with that because that's all you've been saying. Basically, your saying, every job in the world from toll-booth boy to CEO would be filled with an AI Robot? That the gov't would be demolished to set the pace for an "equal society" and that everything in the world would be free. Now... Like I said before, unless you control human emotion, you cannot have a Utopian Society... Why? Because our society has been built on gut instinct and emotions and feelings. People are killed because of another's hatred. Leaders are killed because of a person's different opinion. Violence is caused by the hatred that two or more sides have for each other. Love leads to unexpected things from obsession to adultery to revenge to murder. Fear is caused by someones helplessness towards something. Hate is caused by another's wrong-doing and later leads to violence. Etc... Etc... The list goes on. Next question...(Note: Im not changing the topic, I want to see if I can open another topic to talk about.) What about education? Robots teaching kids multiplication and Calculas to Physics and dissecting frogs? Or would we just be given brain implants to "give" us a set amount of information on a certain subject such as math/science/history etc...?
I have a suggestion for you, read back on all the previous posts, almost all of the stuff you:
A. Misinterpretted.
B. Didn't read.
C. Don't want to accept.
D. Don't understand.
Seriously, I'm done with this conversation, feel free to ramble on, it's a lost cause.
AI is most likely possible. From where we are advancing in technology,almost anything is possible. There are computers that play chess and the sort. Even in starcraft the way we program a computer with instructions to follow specifically...machines can be programmed with the way they work...likea way to think for itself would probably end up in a disaster. I heard they already invented a robot with some sort of AI.
Some stuff or rumors you would've heard about is if computer/robots/machines are able to think for themselves,theyd probably turn on humans which be a fear to a lot of people.
QUOTE(HolySin @ Feb 25 2006, 10:12 PM)
I have a suggestion for you, read back on all the previous posts, almost all of the stuff you:
A. Misinterpretted.
B. Didn't read.
C. Don't want to accept.
D. Don't understand.
Seriously, I'm done with this conversation, feel free to ramble on, it's a lost cause.
[right][snapback]434742[/snapback][/right]
A. I did misinterpret some of it.
B. I did read...
C. I can accept Im just arguing with you...
D. I do understand...
I win then.
Well they have come up with robots, like in Japan and stuff. And that.... Robosapien crap came out and it "responds to voice commands." Computers are our smartest AI machine... so far...knowing how we are today in the world...bringing ai robots or programming them to do things against the human society is very vague.
Probably if we market ai robot , maybe the military would want them. We might be pinnign war agaisnt each other.
For other kinds of ai robots...it just seems humans are getting lazier and programming the robots to do everything for us.I might be out of a limb here...but i guess it depends what they are programmed to do...but the ai is for machines and robots to be able to make decisions for itself like a real human being. it just depends what ai they are given...
Well the military are already using these "RC" type destructo-bot things that basically have an arsenal on its small body similar to that of a typical soldier. The prototypes are mainly use for scoutings out places such as bunkers, radioactive zones and potential bomb threats so they don't endanger human lives.
Possibly once quantum computing goes beyond theoretical stage. But actual thinking computers will never be a possibility on silicon computing of today. Even when that time does come AI will not be anything like human intelligence. Anger, Hate, Love, Passion, these are all things that come naturally to a human and can never truly be simulated by simple programming.
We're a slave to our hormones and chemicals running through our flesh, and the resulting reactions that happen because of the right amount of say adrenaline has many effects. Essentially a computer can never be anything more than a 100% logical machine and is nothing that we actually need. Simple robots for cleaning floors, mowing lawns, and even building houses already exist. To be perfectly honest there's no logical reason why we will ever need AI more advanced than this.
Sure robots will eventually need speech recognition such as "get me a glass of water", but the robot doesnt need to "understand" the words on any higher level.
Paranoid you might call me but go watch "The Second Renaissance" on the Animatrix DVD, which gives a decent portrayal of how "thinking" robots are not necissarily a good thing.
QUOTE((MP)Shorty)
The human brain cannot create something more complex then itself, Humans are estimated to use only 10% of their brains, therefore humans can only make something, 10% as smart, the other 90% is sub-conscious thinking, thinking your mind does without you realizing it, this is what makes us humans so unique.
Thats a silly conclusion, humans released the power of the sun within three years during the Manhattan Project. To say we "cannot" do something is simply ridiculous.
Humans conscience operates on the limbic system, more commonly known as the cerebral cortex, this is the 10% that many have spoken of in this thread. A "sentient" robot would basically be using 100% of its computational power because it lacks a mammilian and reptilian lower brain for emotions. So its entirely possible that if you throw in the right "random" codes a robot intelligence could easily pass up a human in conscious thought. (Which is something we dont want)
QUOTE(HolySin)
We aren't really "running out" of resources, we just lack way to accumulate them. Why would we need a lot of resources? It can be solar powered.
What gives you that impression? All resources on earth are inherently 'limited'. Solar power while fine for certain uses cannot possibly provide a long term solution. Mostly because a single city consumes so much energy during the day that you would need literally dozens upon dozens of miles of solar panels to supply a single city of power and enough to charge enormous batteries underneath the cities to power them through the night hours.
edit: first post after about two years.
QUOTE(Helios @ Mar 6 2006, 12:11 AM)
What gives you that impression? All resources on earth are inherently 'limited'. Solar power while fine for certain uses cannot possibly provide a long term solution. Mostly because a single city consumes so much energy during the day that you would need literally dozens upon dozens of miles of solar panels to supply a single city of power and enough to charge enormous batteries underneath the cities to power them through the night hours.
edit: first post after about two years.
[right][snapback]440349[/snapback][/right]
Matter can neither be created nor destroyed. The problem is distribution and how we can get those resources.
QUOTE(HolySin)
Matter can neither be created nor destroyed. The problem is distribution and how we can get those resources.
Maybe you're not understanding the term correctly. Of course matter is not destroyed when its used, but through use its converted to a form thats no longer purposeful.
Once crude oil is processed into gasoline and burned, far as we're concerned its gone forever. Thus oil production will peak as soon as 2010 and there will be none left to drill from the earth within 30-40 years.
Regardless of if hydrogen will replace standard combustion engines and somewhat slow oil consumption that doesnt change the fact that one day there will be none left drill.
I never said we were restricted to only earth. The problem could be finding another planet for resources. We don't know. Also, the rate in which we get oil is much faster than the rate it regenerates. Oil wouldn't be gone forever unless the entire planet is destroyed, it would simply be a long period in which we would not have oil.
No, the oil that is produced will probably be used right away for special purposes, while the rest of us won't have any.
AI will evolve in a few centuries, but not replace us, like in Terminator or something. But if we continue to make robots better, they will take over our jobs and such, and everything related to money for Humans will generally shut down. I want AI to be advanced enough to be a little slave at home, but not a machine or something that will ruin our planet and such.
Is our brain really more then just an insanly complex circuit board of nerves that carry signals from one place to another?
...No.
I dont see why this is so hard for anyone to understand.
Of course AI is possible! Our brains, the controller of our "intelligence" is maneuvered and controlled by electrical nerve signals! How hard could it be to mimic these?
Humanity is going to need a whole new philosophy on life before you bring in robots. much MUCH MUCH controversy is soon to come. Only way to solve this, is to go back to the roots, and climb your way up by using deductive reasoning. Even then, we're gonna have some problems because EVERYTHING will come into play. Economics, religion, politics. This may very well spark a new wave of thinking.
Now, our ABILITY to do this is a diff thing. I don't know our true limits on technology, but I won't be one bit amazed if it's done within this century alone. Or even have stuff that rivals humans next century.