Report, edit, etc...Posted by DevliN on 2006-09-28 at 04:39:03
QUOTE(in_a_biskit @ Sep 26 2006, 03:40 AM)
QUOTE(Gamma)
How about ban notes for regulars on up?
If you mean that only regulars+ can access information about banned members, I don't see why you'd want that. Being a regular only means that you're active, not that you're necessarily any more mature or anything.
Actually I think he meant that Administrators and Moderators should post information when they ban members who are Regulars and up (like Devilesk and NuclearRabbit). Its useless to have a list of insignificant spammers who were banned, but a list of notable members who were banned would be valid. As I said earlier, up until this topic was made I had no idea why both NR and Devilesk were banned. And thanks to this topic, now I do - my curiosity is settled.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Mp)Blu on 2006-09-28 at 11:17:46
Them ugly people that get banned deserve to be humiliated! 
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Lyon on 2006-09-29 at 19:05:30
Yes, so as soon as i blow it everyone can know.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Doodle77(MM) on 2006-09-29 at 19:39:29
Anyone who wants to know can figure out for themselves.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by JordanN_3335 on 2006-09-29 at 20:06:51
Bleh make it so when someone gets banned theres no need for those extra topics about people fussin.
Yes 44
No 12
Too late theres more yeses then no's.
Yes 44
No 12
Too late theres more yeses then no's.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by KaboomHahahein on 2006-09-29 at 23:11:28
Seems like a good idea to me, why not let us know who gets banned. There are many forums that show that anyways. I love the "fux0red" warn level by the way 
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Jello-Jigglers on 2006-10-03 at 19:26:35
Ban=yes
Warn/suspend=no
Reason:
It's nice to be reminded of what we can and can't do. Also, there are too many warn/suspend situations so that would be taken out of the picture...
2 questions, when would this be put in place(like certain amount of votes or something?) and how would we be notified(by pm or like a thread with a list?)
Warn/suspend=no
Reason:
It's nice to be reminded of what we can and can't do. Also, there are too many warn/suspend situations so that would be taken out of the picture...
2 questions, when would this be put in place(like certain amount of votes or something?) and how would we be notified(by pm or like a thread with a list?)
Report, edit, etc...Posted by in_a_biskit on 2006-10-04 at 05:02:29
QUOTE(Mini_Goose_2707 @ Sep 30 2006, 10:06 AM)
Yes 44
No 12
Too late theres more yeses then no's.
[right][snapback]569882[/snapback][/right]
Too bad SEN's not a democracy...No 12
Too late theres more yeses then no's.
[right][snapback]569882[/snapback][/right]
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Ihaveahardon on 2006-10-04 at 17:06:30
QUOTE(DEAD @ Sep 25 2006, 10:15 AM)
Wrong, devilesk was banned for being a complete idiot. He was gone long before the hack attempts.[right][snapback]567812[/snapback][/right]
Well if that's the case I guess you've been banned plenty of times!
AHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAAHHAHAHAHAHHAHA
Lol Shadow:
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Felino on 2006-10-04 at 21:20:20
In my opinion we need this list and we also need to have a sort of offence list. EG.
Flamming = Perminant ban
Yelling at ditto = Suspention
You know what i mean? It gives people a benchmark, to ban or not to ban. I am not saying that some bannings are unfair or anything. I would be nice to know the limits. As if I would want to push them.
Hmmm lets see were this gets to...
Flamming = Perminant ban
Yelling at ditto = Suspention
You know what i mean? It gives people a benchmark, to ban or not to ban. I am not saying that some bannings are unfair or anything. I would be nice to know the limits. As if I would want to push them.
Hmmm lets see were this gets to...