Ouch! I'll fix it right away.
@1:Are you sure you used the "official" build, not the one I sent you previously?
Yes. It happens in 1.1b too...see attached screen... Ah so if I got it right, for short, you're saying even IF a byte isn't really referenced, but it is there, you still give me the option to tinker with it, just for fun, right ? Well if I got it right, then the better. I am not against offering FULL SUPPORT to manipualting it. It's just that the Unused checkboxes make me think of Unknowns

(damn psychological impact).
@ BK again: Why do movement flags have the codes instead of their names like they did in 1.0 ?
---
Semi-On-Topic:
I might have found out some Unknowns, and because I am getting busy again sorting some personal stuff (bleh, always when I don't need it) and because I am partly lazy to squeeze DatEd in my schedule, is anyone interested in testing some of my possibly crazy theories ? I might have found around ... 10 or so Unknowns. If anyone is interested in wasting time, PM me.
The more certain stuff we have in DatEd, the more fun it will be to use it (plus that way I can harass BK and he can't say NO

)
[right][snapback]527371[/snapback][/right]