Staredit Network

Staredit Network -> Miscellaneous -> How many 5 year olds can you beat up?
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Ultimo on 2005-04-11 at 20:33:09
Woot, start chucking balls at the little kids in a ball pit!
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Voyager7456(MM) on 2005-04-11 at 21:17:44
A laser gun weighing 1 pound, containing 1,000,000 shots and instant cooldown. Password locked, requiring you to solve the equation "3x + 1 = 5" to activate it.

500,000 kills. GG.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by EzDay281 on 2005-04-11 at 21:30:47
If they randomly guessed, eventualy one of them would get it.
And then you would have to guess which one did and kill him before he kills you.

And anyways, in the time it takes for you to put in the password, dozens of the kids will have just thrown theirs at you.
Collectively, that'sa lotta hurta!

also, if it has 'instant' cooldown, then it'll useup all it's shots instantly.
You never specified how long a shot is.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Ultimo on 2005-04-12 at 01:40:11
QUOTE(Voyager7456. @ Apr 11 2005, 06:17 PM)
A laser gun weighing 1 pound, containing 1,000,000 shots and instant cooldown. Password locked, requiring you to solve the equation "3x + 1 = 5" to activate it.

500,000 kills. GG.
[right][snapback]185878[/snapback][/right]

Did you mean the answer to be x = 4/3? Lol, I'd rather get an ak-47, I doubt they could hold one of those. "SAFETY IS ON HAHA!"
Report, edit, etc...Posted by EzDay281 on 2005-04-12 at 01:44:55
QUOTE
x = 4/3?

Why would he mean that?
3x+1=5 looks more confusing, so it would take the 5-year-olds longer to guess it wink.gif
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Zombie on 2005-04-12 at 03:14:10
hell if i had my knife id get around 70 to 90
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Ultimo on 2005-04-12 at 18:59:58
QUOTE(EzDay2 @ Apr 11 2005, 10:44 PM)
Why would he mean that?
3x+1=5 looks more confusing, so it would take the 5-year-olds longer to guess it wink.gif
[right][snapback]186045[/snapback][/right]

I'm just saying if he meant the answer to be 4/3. =P

And if you had a knife, they would all have one. They get one day of training, and all they need to do is either a) rush you b ) throw the knives in unison.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by EzDay281 on 2005-04-12 at 19:54:38
Which, of course, is exactly why we people keep saying things that are meant to be completely harmless in the hands of 5 year olds, Zombie.
Trust me, no matter how good you are, you with your knife would not kill even 40 5-year olds with your knife.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Staredit.Net Essence on 2005-04-12 at 19:57:00
Why would I beat 5 year old kids? Well instead of using weapon, i could use my brain and tell to every 5 yeard old kids to play on the highway... sly.gif
Report, edit, etc...Posted by EzDay281 on 2005-04-12 at 20:04:48
And how would that work if there are no highways available?
And also, they might not know what a highway is.
And also, they want you dead; they can play afterwards.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Voyager7456(MM) on 2005-04-12 at 21:09:04
1 AK-47. Some assembly required.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by SpaceBoy2000 on 2005-04-13 at 01:15:46
The problem with many of the weapons is as someone mentioned, if its light enough to be lifted and the kids collectively throw it at you, you're screwed.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Shift on 2005-04-13 at 01:27:54
Simple, give me and 100 5-year-olds all 30-40 pound swords (or even axes/maces). Their heads will be on the ground/chopped in half/crushed while they are still trying to lift it.

I now see that the one guy already said something like this -- it would still work.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by EzDay281 on 2005-04-13 at 01:47:13
They'd have a hard time lifting it, true, but it takes a lot of energy to swing around a 40 pound object with enough force to mass-kill tightly-packed kids.

I still think my powered armor is best.
The kids will probably all work together to pull the lever on one of the suits down... but then what?
It's too big for them. biggrin.gif
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Ultimo on 2005-04-13 at 09:30:13
Give me a whip and I'll poon them all.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by IsolatedPurity on 2005-04-13 at 09:55:52
21 seems reasonable for me (being 21). I highly doubt anyone could take more than me unless they are older. I wouldn't bother fooling around by like running. My tactics would have to change with whatever they start out with as positions... if a swarm, I would just enter the swarm head on and break down as many as I could before getting surrounded... then start taking a head and shoving it into another head and etc, taking out the biggest threats first. If they did some type of circling at the get-go before even reaching range with me, I'll run at the strongest kid and go from there.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by EzDay281 on 2005-04-13 at 11:11:08
QUOTE
I wouldn't bother fooling around by like running.

It's only 'fooling around' if you can more efficiently fight with about 5 or 6 trying to attack you at once. Personally, being weak as I am, taking out one or two at a time and keeping my distance from any amount that I can't kick before they get close enough to attack would be the best thing I could do.
I wouldn't do any 'charging and rampaging' until I'm tired enough that speed is more important then energy efficiency.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by Oo.ZeALoT.oO on 2005-04-13 at 19:16:27
Well with my Knumb-chuck skillz ( i think its spelled like that) i could probly take out like 43583245 of them. and if i had my buddy Pedro with me, I'd say 432592843523459.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by KrAzY on 2005-04-13 at 20:31:30
How about zombie 5 year olds, I bet you can't even handle one, they come back up and tries to bite you to death.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by pekkel_the_duck on 2005-04-13 at 20:45:14
Numb-chucks, lol.....
Report, edit, etc...Posted by FaZ- on 2005-04-13 at 21:01:14
Any kind of curved blade or scimitar with a good length of 3.5-4.5 feet and I could take plenty, probably upwards of 30. Yes, I know that they also have the same weapons. Curved blades tend to weigh only about 15-20 pounds, light for me to use, but extremely heavy and impossible for a 5 year old to wield. I would back up into a corner (without touching it, stfu in advance.) and simply take any of them that come near me. If they rushed at me, I would simply run down one side of the rush slashing and jumping and kicking as I go. Play football with 5 year olds sometime, they CAN NOT tackle you unless about 6 are on your legs at once, and you are stopped. I would be able to take roughly 40-80, as a guess.

Unarmed, the results are quite a bit different. As the children are specially trained, they would logically take out the back of your legs. No matter which way you turn there is always a back. Once you are down on the ground with a few kids on top of you, chances are that you won't be getting back up. I would guess roughly 12-16 unarmed.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by KrAzY on 2005-04-13 at 22:09:17
I would beat up the most annoying 5 year olds. Count how many there are and thats my answer how many I can beat up smile.gif
Report, edit, etc...Posted by SpaceBoy2000 on 2005-04-14 at 00:30:27
QUOTE(krazydrunkking @ Apr 13 2005, 09:09 PM)
I would beat up the most annoying 5 year olds. Count how many there are and thats my answer how many I can beat up smile.gif
[right][snapback]187222[/snapback][/right]

Not goning to work. Know that amount of them there are in the world, they'll sneeze and you slam into the wall. gg no re.
Report, edit, etc...Posted by KrAzY on 2005-04-14 at 10:27:52
Sure whatever, remember that post said that I was at the war at iraq? I can get my M4A1 Carbine (Military M4 machine gun) and shoot them all.
Next Page (4)