QUOTE(Lithium @ Dec 17 2005, 08:05 PM)
projects like that would cost over a 10 trillion.
[right][snapback]381105[/snapback][/right]
QUOTE(Lithium @ Dec 17 2005, 08:05 PM)
Plus, that kind of funds dont exist even on the world, accounting on...
Mixture of 1,000,000 Chemical Fuel. - about 125,000,000 dollars
Resource for the construction of the ship and the computers - about 200,000,000 dollars.
Research fee of the construction of the massive spacial construct - 200,000,000 dollars.
[right][snapback]381105[/snapback][/right]
That has nothing to do with it. I said we have the
technology, not the money. Pretend that we have infinite funds.
QUOTE(Lithium @ Dec 17 2005, 08:05 PM)
Long it will take - about 20 to 90000 years.
[right][snapback]381105[/snapback][/right]
Somehow, I don't think it will take 90,000 years.
QUOTE(Lithium @ Dec 17 2005, 08:05 PM)
What Minority talking about is Paraterraforming. Thats an ineffective way to produce an habitable planet because we dont even have the infancy of space technology. Mars already has frozen waterlines.
[right][snapback]381105[/snapback][/right]
Come on, we have
at least the "infancy" of space technology. It's not like Ion Drives or laser transmissions were invented in a day.
QUOTE(Lithium @ Dec 17 2005, 08:05 PM)
Plus Sie_Sayoka is technically right. We cant construct something THAT large and put it into space eithedr that or we cant construct something THAT large in space. Therefore we do not have the technology. There might be millions more technical problems that you cant even IMAGINE.
EDIT: one more thing, massive ships are incomplete because we won't be crashing into mars. Do you know how much fuel or how much big of a FAN it would take to land that kind of ship in mars? eventhough the escape velocity in mars is slower.
[right][snapback]381105[/snapback][/right]
O.K., it doesn't have to be that big (make it 100 people). We can send in more afterwards.
QUOTE(Lithium @ Dec 17 2005, 08:05 PM)
Mars's crust dont exactly release Carbon Dioxide so we also need to nuke the surface too, which is inprofitable, OR we could make a satellite microwave, launching thousands of satellites with 2.35GHz Microwave to boil the surface's frozen water molecule, it would warm the surface rather quicker.
[right][snapback]381105[/snapback][/right]
I meant that we could melt the dry ice at the poles, then extract the gases from the rocks, bit by bit. Should've made it clearer, sorry.
I guess we could also bring some heavy gasses from Earth, too.